|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Casino Industry Discussion Casino Industry Discussion - This discussion group concerns industry topics: press releases, stock market issues, Nevada and offshore organizations, and other business related items |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Actually, I'm off to play Tomb Raider, Anniversary Edition, Playstation style. My daughter just got it yesterday, and is insisting that I come right now and play. ![]() |
| The Following User Says Thank You to just play For This Useful Post: | ||
Pinababy69 (9th August 2007) | ||
|
||||
|
I will briefly respond on my opinion and then defer to the wiser.......I think the facts, truths, ramifications,etc should be exposed for all and then it becomes up to the individual to make its own decision as to whom is zooming whom or what. Other than that nothing changes immediately but evolves over time.....Most will care less just like a smoker for a maybe more extreme example. One still makes their own decision on whether one choses to smoke or not regardless of the possible effects,consequences,etc. but at least the proven cover ups (that were not exposed for many years) by all the tobacco companies of the actual effects,consequences,etc. were eventually fully exposed and thus at a minimum, one could make an informed decision based on the actual facts rather than the brainwashing covering up of facts that went on for years, JMO, not speaking for Pina to whom you addressed the question. SIDENOTE: It has already been mentioned in previous posts of the possible effects this could have on the future of US online gaming and I see no need to rehash and include again in my opinion as it is a creature of a different nature.
Last edited by NASHVEGAS; 8th August 2007 at 08:37 PM. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NASHVEGAS For This Useful Post: | ||
just play (8th August 2007), Pinababy69 (9th August 2007) | ||
|
||||
|
I'm just beginning to catch up on this thread.
I noticed that Casino2see (gawd, what a stupid name) removed the other 2-see links. Darn, I was hoping to take someone's temperature ![]() Quality control...hmm. Casino2see is right up there with Connect2casino, Inchilli, Casino1x2, and Joyland Casino as the stupidest named casinos - period. I noticed the list of Naden casinos that is posted here: http://list.playsharepartners.com/ no longer includes Cherry casino (from Betson) but still includes Pharaohs and PlayersClub. These two are still Boss Media - not MGS. Perhaps this is an indication of a pending switch of software providers.
__________________
Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy ~Ben Franklin Useful links: ~ Accredited Casinos ~ I-Gaming Representatives ~ Evil Section ~ Pitch a Bitch ~ Affiliates Click Here ~ Webcast ~ Quit Gambling! ~ Donate Now! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
It didn't come out wrong at all JP. Has stuff like this happened before? Two different situations come to mind off the top of my head. One was an incident involving English Harbour Casino, and what many came to believe was cheating software. There was no dispute that the software was unfair. The majority of debate that went on was whether or not it was intentional on the part of the casino ie. deliberately cheating. Or...as they claimed, it was an error on the part of a programmer. It was one of the most viewed and discussed threads here at CM. I pretty much stayed out of that one, as I have zero technical knowledge and generally find that it's better to not comment if you don't fully understand something. Situation two involved Jackpot Factory and their "Inspirational Stories". It related to a really sleazy marketing campaign employed by Jackpot Factory, where they basically saturated the internet with stories of how playing slots could cure depression, financial woes, thoughts of suicide, marital discord, arthritis...and so on, ad nauseum. These pages were filled with keywords that specifically targetted search engines, in an effort to gain higher rankings. It was the only time that I can remember the ENTIRE playing community uniting behind having it stopped, and a suitable "punishment" being imposed. If you ever have about two hours to kill, the thread makes an excellent read. But be prepared, it's about sixty or more pages long I think. I got very involved in that one, and spent countless hours searching the web, emailing, etc. I like to think that I helped make a difference, as did so many others. Why do I do this and what do I hope to accomplish? I do it because it offends my sense of right and wrong. The only thing I hope to accomplish is to get to the truth (eventually) and post the facts, so that the average player can at least make an informed decision when choosing which casino to donate their money to. I am a realist, and as such, I'd guess that 95% of the player community could really care less about issues such as this (a poll may be interesting). Their main concern is are they going to get paid if they win. They don't care what goes on behind the scenes, or what marketing tactics a company uses to gain players. I spend my time digging mostly for the other 5% who do care about this stuff, but maybe who don't have the time to do it themselves. In the end, does it really make a difference? Again, realistically, probably not. But maybe I can be a small thorn in their side for a short period of time. And if by doing that, it makes them uncomfortable enough to implement some change...I'd be ecstatic. A high profile forum such as this gets read by so many in this industry. Just because you don't see them at the bottom of the board, doesn't mean they aren't there. You'd be surprised. And I seriously doubt that they enjoy seeing their names and companies dragged through the mud. It takes alot to get me this involved. But this one pushed all the right (or wrong) buttons. I don't like deceit and I don't like whitewash. And I especially don't like casino representatives who think they can play any of us for fools. One day they will realize that we pay their salaries, and without us, they would all be out of jobs. I will shut up (for now anyway). I can hear the cries of "about bloody time" from here, lol. |
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Pinababy69 For This Useful Post: | ||
jod5413 (9th August 2007), just play (9th August 2007), mrracetrack (9th August 2007), NASHVEGAS (9th August 2007), SeattleSinner (9th August 2007) | ||
|
||||
|
Thank you Pina, that was a perfect post...I now understand it better. I am one of those people who think one person can't make a difference, but I am beginning to think that is wrong, and one or a few people CAN make a difference.
I really appreciate you taking the time to answer me. |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to just play For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
Quote:
When I started playing online 5 or 6 years ago..I knew nothing. I thought that Virtual was cool for always having all those free coupons, lol. The only way I learned was by making mistakes, and by being a pushy bitch who never knows when to shut up. ![]() |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Pinababy69 For This Useful Post: | ||
just play (9th August 2007) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
First off, I definitely do believe that a forum - and particularly a widely read one like Casinomeister - can make real improvements by flagging issues and bringing about change. I've seen proof of this frequently on the many and varied issues that have appeared here over the years, and a recent survey showed that up to 40 percent of online gamblers visit message boards for information. So the medium has reach, for sure. There are also guys on a forum like this who are either casino reps or folks like the Meister who have wide industry contacts built up over time, and can draw their attention to matters arising here and press the issue further. Generally speaking, I think the more reputable the company the more likely it is that something positive will happen, in many cases behind the scenes, because successful companies don't like to see their rep and future goodwill dissipated. Sometimes these issues are not created by dishonesty and malice aforethought, but by silly mistakes that even major companies make through inadequate thought or research on a venture. Major companies or not - they're still run by people, and as we all know, people screw up occasionally. Less reputable companies can be forced into addressing issues by the weight of public opinion and the knowledge that if enough players start blacklisting them their business will definitely suffer. And a forum is a great way of spreading the word about crappy companies. There are inevitably those bum outfits who continue to survive by constantly attracting new and uninformed gamblers whom they can screw. Virtual comes to mind LOL! And even software providers who are lax in their choice and monitoring of licensees are consequently smeared with the same mud. I often wonder whether these scummy operators ever ask themselves how much bigger their businesses could be if they had a good rep in addition to the flow of new and largely ignorant blood. So, yes - I firmly believe that balanced and diverse message boards like this one are good for the industry and can effect change. And they are clearly good for the player as a source of information and the protection that knowledge brings in a largely unregulated industry that has few boundaries. Long may it remain so.
__________________
jetset |
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post: | ||
chayton (16th August 2007), heatherad (9th August 2007), jod5413 (9th August 2007), just play (9th August 2007), mrracetrack (9th August 2007), Pinababy69 (9th August 2007) | ||
|
|||
|
Yep, the hard-core porno links are gone. However, the 24h support girl is still in a prone position, and ready for her next "hot sex talk" phone call. Very reminiscent of the late night phone sex tv ads for the 900 number companies. I guess if someone were at the Playboy Gaming website, this would be common fare (just guessing here), and IMO perfectly fine. However, I didn't know that this was the "image" that MG wanted to portray. I always thought that when I call a 24 hr casino support number, I'm actually gonna talk to a casino support person rather than a phone sex operator. Silly me.
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Pinababy69 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PR: Microgaming Consolidation | Casinomeister | Casino Industry Discussion | 2 | 8th May 2006 05:32 PM |
| Reputable Casinos link above | Limewire87 | Online Casinos | 3 | 2nd August 2004 08:24 PM |
Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews
| Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots |
Online Casino Reviews
Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.