When I'm wrong I'll admit it!!!

**henryVIII** · 31st May 2007, 12:55 PM

Originally Posted by Da_Gambla

I'm actually more used to being stalked by the female variety,

hahahaha ...

Couldnt be bothered reading his whole rant but talk about self-love or what?

Keep 'em coming.

**Vesuvio** · 31st May 2007, 01:05 PM

Da_Gambla - ok, let's just agree to disagree on whether Playboy casino showing naked women is sexual or not.

As to the "Bonus Hunter crap" - I'm only involved in on-line casinos for the bonuses. It's not that good service, fast payment and all the rest don't interest me, but don't be suprised if I mainly comment on bonuses.

Just a general point - I wonder if Playboy changed over to Crypto partly because Microgaming wouldn't allow them to have games with a sexual content? Anyone know anything about the reasons?

**Da_Gambla** · 31st May 2007, 01:05 PM

Originally Posted by henryVIII

Hilarious.

Saying this in the middle of a half page rant.

Of course teenage girls in lingerie flashing their breasts and bending over in front of sports cars is a type of soft porn. Were you brought up in a bordello or something?

You are hilarious though.

Originally Posted by henryVIII

hahahaha ...

Couldnt be bothered reading his whole rant but talk about self-love or what?

Keep 'em coming.

Henry, you'll just have to take my word for this... once you actually DO get laid once, just pictures of girls naked won't do that much for you anymore. It's just another picture... After you actually experience sex, your definition of what's pornographic will naturally change, and the breeze will no longer leave a stain in your knickers.

Be patient, your time will come someday!

- Keith

**Da_Gambla** · 31st May 2007, 01:15 PM

Originally Posted by Vesuvio

Da_Gambla - ok, let's just agree to disagree on whether Playboy casino showing naked women is sexual or not.

: sigh :

I never said the casino showing nudity might be construed as "sexual". That's a very general term. But as to whether or not it is porn? I think we agree.

/end

- Keith

**tencardcharlie** · 31st May 2007, 01:20 PM

I see your point Trezz, but to be honest, sexual content is already a part of the industry. I see ridicoulus banners with chicks crawling around inviting me to "come and play" everywhere. It doesn't really offend me, I just think it is kinda stupid. At least if people go to playboy casino they won't be surprised over the content.

Anyway, I know that some people may be disappointed but the people operating the dealers doesn't really look like you might think. I know because I am working there myself. Here is a picture of me at work:

I'm sorry if I ruined the experience for anyone. Cheers!

**Casinomeister** · 31st May 2007, 01:20 PM

I'm gonna have a Drill Sergeant flash back in a New York minute if any more personal jabs derail any thread in this forum. We're talking suspensions.

Three derailed threads in one week is enough.

**Vesuvio** · 31st May 2007, 01:21 PM

Originally Posted by Da_Gambla

But as to whether or not it is porn? I think we agree.

No, we disagree - I think it's soft porn. Lame (I think that's the word

) and innocuous, but still porn.

**NASHVEGAS** · 31st May 2007, 01:28 PM

I respect the OP's values(not necessarily the way he went about his Agenda i.e. CM,etc.). That being said I live in the heart of the Bible belt so I already know I'm goimg to Hell(remember Frist) so I prefer at certain times to live by that gr8 line from the flick, Risky Business.........."SOMETIMES YOU JUST GOTTA SAY WHAT THE FUCK"

< even looks like T CRUISE. P.S.,Trezz another Nashville Bible Belt resident is the famous Aussie Nicole Kidman. Gotta luv her soft porn.,lol.......I request permission to change my avatar to nude shots of Nicole please

**jetset** · 31st May 2007, 01:31 PM

SEXY VC POKER AD CRITICISED

ASA says sexual association with gambling is irresponsible

The UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ruled in favour of a complaint that a VC Poker.com advertising campaign was irresponsible in associating sex and gambling, and has called for a halt to the public presentation of the material.

The campaign featured a scantily clad woman with the strapline: "You love sex. She loves sex. You love money. She loves money. You have money. She loves you."

Agreeing with the complainant that the advert was irresponsible, the ASA said in its judgement that, despite Victor Chandler's claim that the ads had merely sought to suggest that "everyone loves a winner" the material implied that gambling would improve players' sex lives.

The watchdog also said the line "see how much you have in common," reinforced the notion that men "...even if socially inept, could obtain sexual success".

Advertising rules in the UK apparently prohibit the association of gambling with sexual prowess.

**Casinomeister** · 31st May 2007, 01:31 PM

Originally Posted by Vesuvio

..Just a general point - I wonder if Playtech changed over to Crypto partly because Microsoft wouldn't allow them to have games with a sexual content? Anyone know anything about the reasons?

Eh? Do you mean some Crypto moving to Playtech? (Ritz/Club on the Park)?

Playtech is publicly traded, Crypto is publicly traded, so is Playboy. What's this have to do with Microsoft - do you mean Microgaming? MGS is privately held.