Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Safe from U.S. extradition?

  1. #1
    Rollo's Avatar
    Rollo is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Tropic of Cancer
    Posts
    137
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 61 Times in 33 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 330

    Safe from U.S. extradition?

    It look like there are few 100% safe havens.

    As a start here is a little sample:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ition_treaties

    Of course, a lot of this doesn't apply to online gambling but more for such offenses as muder, rape, etc... so just for the sake of fun, in which counties do you think gambling moguls safe would be safe from a U.S. extradition request?

    Beats the hell out of me but it's safe to say the Domincan Republic is not on the list. I'd guess Israel is safe. Antingua for the moment. Cuba won't extradite. It looks like everyone is making their way out of Costa Rica as fast as they can.

    I've heard Brazil (who harbored the Great Train Robber for decades), Venezuela and others don't extradite for financial crimes... it's quite difficult to tell. Also, just becuae a contry doesn't have a formal extradition agreement with the U.S. doesn't mean they won't honor such requests on a case by case basis.

    Very confusing.

  2. #2
    Simmo!'s Avatar
    Simmo! is offline Moderator Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial Magnet!Tagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    You say UK, I say England.
    Posts
    9,274
    Thanks
    1,694
    Thanked 4,372 Times in 2,079 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 23379
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo View Post
    ..in which counties do you think gambling moguls safe would be safe from a U.S. extradition request?
    I'm no political analyst, but it seems to me from recent events (ie: the bankers extradited from the UK last year) that the US terrorism laws pretty much allow carte blanche for the DoJ. In effect, anyone could be extradited from anywhere for anything just by them stating suspected terrorist related activity. What's more they have public sympathy on their side in the fight against terror.


  3. #3
    Mousey's Avatar
    Mousey is online now Ueber Meister Mouse Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience PointsOverdriveSocial Magnet!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Up$hitCreek
    Posts
    3,046
    Thanks
    2,485
    Thanked 2,657 Times in 1,426 Posts
    Rep Power
    117
    Reputation Points: 14003
    anyone could be extradited from anywhere for anything just by them stating suspected terrorist related activity
    If there's only one thing we've learned recently, it is that all the DoJ and/or FBI has to do is wave a paper and wiggle their finger and countries, international banks, governments, hand over whatever and whoever the DoJ wants.
    Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
    The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.

  4. #4
    lojo is offline Banned User - repetitive violations of posting rule 1.1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,127
    Thanks
    3,554
    Thanked 1,815 Times in 1,216 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 5
    Yip, extradition is known to them as 'rendition' and they have extraordinary versions of it

  5. #5
    GrandMaster's Avatar
    GrandMaster is offline Ueber Meister Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,549
    Thanks
    177
    Thanked 951 Times in 534 Posts
    Rep Power
    73
    Reputation Points: 5493
    Quote Originally Posted by Simmo! View Post
    I'm no political analyst, but it seems to me from recent events (ie: the bankers extradited from the UK last year) that the US terrorism laws pretty much allow carte blanche for the DoJ. In effect, anyone could be extradited from anywhere for anything just by them stating suspected terrorist related activity. What's more they have public sympathy on their side in the fight against terror.
    It has more to do with the spineless Blair government and the new extradition treaty, which does away with old-fashioned things like having to produce evidence in court. It is now easier to extradite someone from the UK to the US than to arrest him in the US, where the 4th amendment still applies.
    "The voice of reason"
    http://mb.winneronline.com moderator

  6. #6
    jetset's Avatar
    jetset is offline Ueber Meister Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Blog entry50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouTagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    12,357
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    2,063
    Thanked 5,467 Times in 2,355 Posts
    Rep Power
    257
    Reputation Points: 30011
    Under the anti-terrorism extradition agreement the extraditing authority does not even have to prove a prima facie case, I believe - and an article in the mainstream media on the abuse of its provisions by US enforcement zealots last year gave some pretty staggering statistics on the people who have been extradited...the majority of them faced charges that had nothing to do with terrorism.
    jetset

  7. #7
    Rollo's Avatar
    Rollo is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Tropic of Cancer
    Posts
    137
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 61 Times in 33 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 330
    Yes, seems like there aren't many safe heavans. Extradition laws are so complex and add to that ever-changing that it's not a good time to be a fututive. Running for the Mexican border is long over... but I think many countries don't extradite for many types of financial crimes to which gambling seemily would be related. Marc Rich of Clinton fame was living safely in Switzerland. Brazil, I hear, doesn't extradite for financial crimes either.

    Anyway, I guess there are a few Sportsbetting billionaires out there sweating brinks right now (re: Calvin Ayre).

    Antigua is nice, but who would want be trapped there forever as travel becomes too risky? Well, then again I'd still probably trade places...

  8. #8
    Paddy is offline Banned User - violation of posting rule 1.6, 1.9 and 1.11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 90
    It depends on what crime you are talking about.

    If you are talking about online gambling, then online gambling has to be a crime in the "requested state" as well, i.e. in the country being asked to extradite. So, on that rule, called the dual criminality rule, Antigua, for instance, wouldn't extradite.

    It's a safe bet to say that Cuba, Venezuela, and Bolivia won't extradite either. Ireland wouldn't extradite for something bullshit like online gambling. Ireland pretty well always refuses American extradition requests.

    Many countries, including most of those in continental Europe, have a clause in their treaties with the US that allow them to refuse to extradite their own citizens. What they do is receive the US evidence in their own courts, and try the person sought in their own country. The constitutions of many countries, including Canada, forbid the extradition of citizens of those countries.

Similar Threads

  1. Is Casino Del Rio safe to play?
    By MCR11 in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 20th December 2006, 10:04 AM
  2. Bush Signs Safe Port Act
    By LooneyTunez in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 16th October 2006, 04:42 AM
  3. VPL Statement (Safe Port Act) - Good News
    By VPL in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 5th October 2006, 05:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.