Crap
What crap!
They are worried about punters backing a horse to lose, isn't that what bookmakers do all the time when they accept a bet?
Probably the REAL reason is to protect bookmakers, who lose trade because the exchanges give fairer odds to the punter.
I hope they have a rapid prison building program, I can't see punters giving in that easily. How are they going to enforce it, betting exchanges offer a lot more than racing bets. Here in the UK, the racing industry's integrity was shattered by the use of inside information, and horse/jockey nobbling, but the money was made with traditional bookmakers by knowing a favourite would lose and backing a better priced nag that would most likely win.
My Uncle has been in Australia for years, and he tells me that the tales of Pokie machines in almost every public building were pretty much true, at least in the past. We have them here in the UK now, not as good, but offered through a loophole in our gaming laws. (They may well be banned in September when new rules come in - but that has more to do with the loophole also being a tax dodge rather than protecting the players
)
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks