Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > The Amazing World of Online Casinos and Poker Rooms > Casino Industry Discussion

Notices

Casino Industry Discussion Casino Industry Discussion - This discussion group concerns industry topics: press releases, stock market issues, Nevada and offshore organizations, and other business related items

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25th January 2007, 08:22 AM
Rollo's Avatar
Dormant account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tropic of Cancer
Posts: 137
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 9
Thanked 60 Times in 33 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 325
Rep Power: 0
Rollo is a jewel in the roughRollo is a jewel in the roughRollo is a jewel in the roughRollo is a jewel in the rough
Google, Yahoo to ban gambling??

I found this article and can't figure out what it means or even if it's credible so I wanted to post it here for your perusal. Google and Yahoo already ban pay per click gambling ads. What sort of "casino advertisements" could they mean? They mention here something about pop-ups and minors. Pop-ups? Minors? WTF?

If this is some foreshadowing that Google is going to purge all gaming content, then that's bretty big news but this "source" could just be a retard making noise as well. I guess I need help deciphering this one. Anyone heard anything about this?


Google Set to Remove Online Gambling Advertisements
24-01-07

Casino advertisements on the giant search engine Google could be a thing of the past following a decision by Google HQ currently being reported in marketing media.

The reason behind the decision is reportedly that Google and its rival Yahoo! have allegedly been warned off by the US Justice Department authorities for promoting gambling indirectly to an underage audience through advertising pop-ups.


The voluntary decision applies only to the United States in the case of Yahoo!, where Justice officials have been exercising a major crackdown on all aspects of Internet gambling. However, it is understood that Google plans to extend the ban globally.


The news follows hot on the heels of reports that the US Justice Department is to order banks in the UK to hand over information concerning their dealings with several online poker sites. It seems apparent that the Department of Justice is targeting online sites that trade their stock publicly on the London Stock Exchange, such as PartyGaming and 888 Holdings.

Source: http://www.igamingbusiness.com/artic...rticleID=12675
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rollo For This Useful Post:
winbig (25th January 2007)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25th January 2007, 08:28 AM
winbig's Avatar
What a pretty sight :)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,163
WTGs: 21
WTGd at 151 Times in 42 Posts
Thanks: 989
Thanked 2,689 Times in 1,559 Posts
Nominated 5 Times in 3 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 13932
Rep Power: 115
winbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to winbig Send a message via MSN to winbig Send a message via Yahoo to winbig
Another article about it:

http://www.onlinecasino.org/news/cas...oogle-1500.php

and

http://www.onlinecasinonews.com/ocnv...e.asp?id=12673

If the latter is true, the DoJ definitely had a voice in the matter, strong arming Yahoo & Google.

I'm sure we'll hear more about it today.


If this is true:

For them to ban online gambling searches, but not porn searches is a DISGRACE. They cite "underage" people being led to gambling by popups. What about these "underage" people being led to PORN via popups? Which is more common? You decide.

One is just as bad as another.

Oops, maybe I shouldn't give them anymore ideas.

Or how about these pedophiles searching for illegal child porn sites? Why aren't they doing about searches for keywords such as those? As it is now, they only remove a listing if it's reported for having illegal content.
__________________
New - Las Vegas Site & Forum
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25th January 2007, 09:17 AM
RobWin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tamarack Forest
Posts: 3,531
WTGs: 270
WTGd at 281 Times in 54 Posts
Thanks: 3,821
Thanked 2,465 Times in 1,309 Posts
Nominated 3 Times in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 12766
Rep Power: 99
RobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond reputeRobWin has a reputation beyond repute
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by winbig View Post
Another article about it:

http://www.onlinecasino.org/news/cas...oogle-1500.php

and

http://www.onlinecasinonews.com/ocnv...e.asp?id=12673

If the latter is true, the DoJ definitely had a voice in the matter, strong arming Yahoo & Google.

I'm sure we'll hear more about it today.


If this is true:

For them to ban online gambling searches, but not porn searches is a DISGRACE. They cite "underage" people being led to gambling by popups. What about these "underage" people being led to PORN via popups? Which is more common? You decide.

One is just as bad as another.

Oops, maybe I shouldn't give them anymore ideas.

Or how about these pedophiles searching for illegal child porn sites? Why aren't they doing about searches for keywords such as those? As it is now, they only remove a listing if it's reported for having illegal content.

Bush and his cronies totally out of control and running loose rampantly....refer back to this post:

http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...tml#post143064
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25th January 2007, 01:34 PM
Mousey's Avatar
Resident Rodent
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Up$hitCreek
Posts: 2,016
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 2 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 1,522
Thanked 1,562 Times in 869 Posts
Nominated 7 Times in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 8174
Rep Power: 68
Mousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond reputeMousey has a reputation beyond repute
Ugly, ugly days we are living in my friends.... Remember when liquor could not be advertised on TV here in the states? Well, Absolut and SoCo now advertise on TV. Took years to get back to this point. And now this with the search engines and online gambling.... Censorship...

Haven't the search engines already been 'warned' by the DoJ a while back? (I'm old, I forget...)
__________________
Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25th January 2007, 07:07 PM
lots0's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: My own private Idaho
Posts: 1,167
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 8 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 633
Thanked 706 Times in 380 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3572
Rep Power: 33
lots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond repute
All these 'stories' are attributed to a story in "marketing media" there is no source other than that given.

I have searched all the google sources for infomation on this, I also contacted some rather high up folks at google...

This story is bull shit.

For the record: Google and Yahoo both received notice from the US DOJ waaaaay back in 2004, to stop showing gambling ads, both companies stopped accecpting online gambling ads right after that.

Once in awhile some SEO figures out how to bate and switch google adwords or Yahoo Publisher so their casino ad will show for a while, but as soon as google or Yahoo spots it (in a few days) the ads are pulled.
__________________
Cheaters Suck...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25th January 2007, 09:59 PM
Rollo's Avatar
Dormant account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tropic of Cancer
Posts: 137
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 9
Thanked 60 Times in 33 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 325
Rep Power: 0
Rollo is a jewel in the roughRollo is a jewel in the roughRollo is a jewel in the roughRollo is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
This story is bull shit.
That's what I thought as well. Google purging gambling content is unprecidented... especially when they haven't made any effort to block far more illegal and offensive content.

The author didn't seem to have a very good grasp the web either. How would Google ban "pop-ups" (a task for browsers) and why are popups more culpable in corrupting youth than say, a banner ad?

Yes, I think bullshit is right.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28th January 2007, 12:58 PM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 77
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 57
Rep Power: 28
jerryg has been spending a lot of time in the forum
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollo View Post
The reason behind the decision is reportedly that Google and its rival Yahoo! have allegedly been warned off by the US Justice Department authorities for promoting gambling indirectly to an underage audience through advertising pop-ups.
I can't remember being served a pop up by either site, gambling or otherwise.

I thought google's policy has been (for some time) that gambling advertisements are ok as long as it's not an ad for a site that directly has live wagering. Example: How to beat Blackjack, would be acceptable.

Yahoo is a bit inconsistent, but I think their general policy is always no gambling. But again, they are inconsistent. Sometimes I will submit a link on Y Search Marketing that is rejected as "gambling site", but if I wait a couple of days and resubmit the identicle link & description it will be approved. It seems like it just depends on who is reviewing it.
__________________
Global Gaming News.com - No gossip, no conjecture, just news
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The War Against Online Gambling Rollo Casino Industry Discussion 29 25th October 2008 04:26 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk