Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Google, Yahoo to ban gambling??

  1. #1
    Rollo's Avatar
    Rollo is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Tropic of Cancer
    Posts
    137
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 61 Times in 33 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 330

    Google, Yahoo to ban gambling??

    I found this article and can't figure out what it means or even if it's credible so I wanted to post it here for your perusal. Google and Yahoo already ban pay per click gambling ads. What sort of "casino advertisements" could they mean? They mention here something about pop-ups and minors. Pop-ups? Minors? WTF?

    If this is some foreshadowing that Google is going to purge all gaming content, then that's bretty big news but this "source" could just be a retard making noise as well. I guess I need help deciphering this one. Anyone heard anything about this?


    Google Set to Remove Online Gambling Advertisements
    24-01-07

    Casino advertisements on the giant search engine Google could be a thing of the past following a decision by Google HQ currently being reported in marketing media.

    The reason behind the decision is reportedly that Google and its rival Yahoo! have allegedly been warned off by the US Justice Department authorities for promoting gambling indirectly to an underage audience through advertising pop-ups.


    The voluntary decision applies only to the United States in the case of Yahoo!, where Justice officials have been exercising a major crackdown on all aspects of Internet gambling. However, it is understood that Google plans to extend the ban globally.


    The news follows hot on the heels of reports that the US Justice Department is to order banks in the UK to hand over information concerning their dealings with several online poker sites. It seems apparent that the Department of Justice is targeting online sites that trade their stock publicly on the London Stock Exchange, such as PartyGaming and 888 Holdings.

    Source: http://www.igamingbusiness.com/artic...rticleID=12675

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Rollo For This Useful Post:

    winbig (25th January 2007)

  3. #2
    winbig's Avatar
    winbig is offline mmmm, Foxy.
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes You
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,228
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks
    1,371
    Thanked 3,608 Times in 2,120 Posts
    Rep Power
    165
    Reputation Points: 19093
    Another article about it:

    http://www.onlinecasino.org/news/cas...oogle-1500.php

    and

    http://www.onlinecasinonews.com/ocnv...e.asp?id=12673

    If the latter is true, the DoJ definitely had a voice in the matter, strong arming Yahoo & Google.

    I'm sure we'll hear more about it today.


    If this is true:

    For them to ban online gambling searches, but not porn searches is a DISGRACE. They cite "underage" people being led to gambling by popups. What about these "underage" people being led to PORN via popups? Which is more common? You decide.

    One is just as bad as another.

    Oops, maybe I shouldn't give them anymore ideas.

    Or how about these pedophiles searching for illegal child porn sites? Why aren't they doing about searches for keywords such as those? As it is now, they only remove a listing if it's reported for having illegal content.
    Operators: If you don't know what Transparency means, then here you go.....now how about practicing it?

    Transparency, as used in the humanities and in a social context more generally, implies openness, communication, and accountability. It is a metaphorical extension of the meaning a "transparent" object is one that can be seen through. ...

  4. #3
    RobWin is offline closed account
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    A Vault!
    Posts
    6,137
    Thanks
    7,434
    Thanked 4,338 Times in 2,278 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 23468

    Angry

    Quote Originally Posted by winbig View Post
    Another article about it:

    http://www.onlinecasino.org/news/cas...oogle-1500.php

    and

    http://www.onlinecasinonews.com/ocnv...e.asp?id=12673

    If the latter is true, the DoJ definitely had a voice in the matter, strong arming Yahoo & Google.

    I'm sure we'll hear more about it today.


    If this is true:

    For them to ban online gambling searches, but not porn searches is a DISGRACE. They cite "underage" people being led to gambling by popups. What about these "underage" people being led to PORN via popups? Which is more common? You decide.

    One is just as bad as another.

    Oops, maybe I shouldn't give them anymore ideas.

    Or how about these pedophiles searching for illegal child porn sites? Why aren't they doing about searches for keywords such as those? As it is now, they only remove a listing if it's reported for having illegal content.

    Bush and his cronies totally out of control and running loose rampantly....refer back to this post:

    http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...tml#post143064

  5. #4
    Mousey's Avatar
    Mousey is offline Ueber Meister Mouse Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience PointsOverdriveSocial Magnet!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Up$hitCreek
    Posts
    2,854
    Thanks
    2,294
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 1,304 Posts
    Rep Power
    109
    Reputation Points: 12893
    Ugly, ugly days we are living in my friends.... Remember when liquor could not be advertised on TV here in the states? Well, Absolut and SoCo now advertise on TV. Took years to get back to this point. And now this with the search engines and online gambling.... Censorship...

    Haven't the search engines already been 'warned' by the DoJ a while back? (I'm old, I forget...)
    Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
    The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.

  6. #5
    lots0's Avatar
    lots0 is offline Not a Damn Huggin Bear
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    2,203
    Thanks
    1,393
    Thanked 1,612 Times in 805 Posts
    Rep Power
    79
    Reputation Points: 8982
    All these 'stories' are attributed to a story in "marketing media" there is no source other than that given.

    I have searched all the google sources for infomation on this, I also contacted some rather high up folks at google...

    This story is bull shit.

    For the record: Google and Yahoo both received notice from the US DOJ waaaaay back in 2004, to stop showing gambling ads, both companies stopped accecpting online gambling ads right after that.

    Once in awhile some SEO figures out how to bate and switch google adwords or Yahoo Publisher so their casino ad will show for a while, but as soon as google or Yahoo spots it (in a few days) the ads are pulled.
    Beware... Killer Teddy in the house...

  7. #6
    Rollo's Avatar
    Rollo is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Tropic of Cancer
    Posts
    137
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 61 Times in 33 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 330
    This story is bull shit.
    That's what I thought as well. Google purging gambling content is unprecidented... especially when they haven't made any effort to block far more illegal and offensive content.

    The author didn't seem to have a very good grasp the web either. How would Google ban "pop-ups" (a task for browsers) and why are popups more culpable in corrupting youth than say, a banner ad?

    Yes, I think bullshit is right.

  8. #7
    jerryg is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 62
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo View Post
    The reason behind the decision is reportedly that Google and its rival Yahoo! have allegedly been warned off by the US Justice Department authorities for promoting gambling indirectly to an underage audience through advertising pop-ups.
    I can't remember being served a pop up by either site, gambling or otherwise.

    I thought google's policy has been (for some time) that gambling advertisements are ok as long as it's not an ad for a site that directly has live wagering. Example: How to beat Blackjack, would be acceptable.

    Yahoo is a bit inconsistent, but I think their general policy is always no gambling. But again, they are inconsistent. Sometimes I will submit a link on Y Search Marketing that is rejected as "gambling site", but if I wait a couple of days and resubmit the identicle link & description it will be approved. It seems like it just depends on who is reviewing it.

Similar Threads

  1. The War Against Online Gambling
    By Rollo in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 25th October 2008, 03:26 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.