Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Westland Bowl
Who would/should be the regulators? Federal or state level?
|
I have been trying to figure out how this would work too. I'm no politician or anything of the sort, but here is a high-level overview of what I have come up with so far:
1. Each state should individually decide if
(a) its residents can engage in online gambling, and
(b) online gaming businesses can set up shop within that state.
2. If the state decides to permit online gaming businesses to set up shop within its borders, it can grant a "Level 1" license to an applicant seeking to do so, upon the completion of due diligence - criminal background checks (excluding online gambling "violations"

), software and RNG fairness and accuracy, banking security, financial backing, etc.
Note that such a "Level 1" license would ONLY permit the business to serve customers within that state.
3. Upon being issued a "Level 1" license from the state, the business can, if it chooses, apply for a "Level 2" license from the Federal Government. A "Level 2" license would permit the operation to serve customers from other states that allow their residents to gamble online, and foreign jurisdictions where it is legal to gamble online.
4. Taxes - can probably remain the same as they are now. Sometimes the House wins, sometimes the Player wins. But no matter which side comes out ahead any given month, the government will ALWAYS get a cut from the taxes. So the only guaranteed long-term winner would be the government.
Okay, well... that's it. Like I said, it's very high-level and I'm no politician... and I would definitely like to hear others' thoughts on this subject.