Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > The Amazing World of Online Casinos and Poker Rooms > Casino Industry Discussion

Notices

Casino Industry Discussion Casino Industry Discussion - This discussion group concerns industry topics: press releases, stock market issues, Nevada and offshore organizations, and other business related items

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25th May 2006, 11:02 PM
Casinomeister's Avatar
Xmas Cheer Meister
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Location: Here near my Bier, my dear.
Posts: 13,745
WTGs: 10
WTGd at 32 Times in 18 Posts
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 4,652 Times in 1,692 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Reputation Points: 24124
Rep Power: 15
Casinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond repute
Post Internet Gambling Prohibition Act is Approved

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee today approved Rep. Bob Goodlatte's
"Internet Gambling Prohibition Act" as well as Rep. James Leach's "Unlawful
Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006." Both bills will proceed to the
full House of Representatives for further consideration.


House Committee Passes Goodlatte and Leach I-Gaming Legislation
by Bradley Vallerius


The U.S. House Judiciary Committee today approved Rep. Bob Goodlatte's, R-Va., HR 4777, "the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act" as well as Rep. James Leach's, R-Iowa, HR 4411, "the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006." Both bills will proceed to the full House of Representatives for further consideration.

The committee began the morning with the markup of Goodlatte's bill. Very early on Rep. Chris Cannon, R-Utah, proposed an amendment to strike language referring to horse race wagering. During HR4777's hearing before the House Judiciary subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security in early April the status of Internet horse race wagering had been the subject of much confusion. Many representatives at the hearing, including Cannon (who is not actually a member of the subcommittee but is very interested in the issue), indicated that they could not support Goodlatte's bill because of its lack of clarity with regards to horse race wagering. While Goodlatte claimed that his bill made no judgment about the legality of Internet horse race wagering, a representative from the Justice Department stated to the contrary that his agency could not support the bill because of its exception of horse race wagering.

For the full story, go to:
http://www.igamingnews.com/index.cfm...sting&tid=6702
__________________
Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy
~Ben Franklin

Useful links: ~ Accredited Casinos ~ I-Gaming Representatives ~ Evil Section ~ My Wish List ~ The Meister on YouTube ~ Donate Now!

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26th May 2006, 04:27 AM
Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Californication
Posts: 647
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 229
Thanked 301 Times in 179 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1496
Rep Power: 0
pacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud of
I'm afraid it is going to pass into law Bryan. The GOP congressmen are on the ropes politically and passing this legislation would amount to a small appeasement to the far right, god fearing, moral majority types in the republican party. Besides, they probably know that if they are going to pass it they need to do it now before their party is over in November and the dems take back congress. I just hope the internet sites don't crank down the software to the point of it being impossible to win so that they can absorb as much revenue as they can now before it is too late! What will the puritans come for next? Our beer, our cigarettes, thoughts?!?!?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26th May 2006, 09:53 AM
jetset's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,371
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 880
Thanked 2,946 Times in 1,362 Posts
Nominated 7 Times in 2 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 15704
Rep Power: 161
jetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond repute
The hypocrisy resident in this decision is staggering, but then we have seen these carve-outs in previous attempts so should not be overly surprised.

This time Goodlatte has quite adroitly side-stepped prior failing issues by simply ignoring them or giving the authority to decide to states and Justice officials - he's obviously been doing a lot of footwork on this project of his.

The fat lady has not yet sung, however. This marked up version of the Bill still has to be accepted on the House floor, then the Senate and finally the president.

I see there is already talk of combining the two Bills (Goodlatte and Leach) which is something that a few of the savvy folks in Washington predicted would happen to avoid one conflicting with the other.

This is a (negative) step forward for Goodlatte, but there's a way to go yet.
__________________
jetset
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post:
dominique (11th June 2006)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11th June 2006, 03:57 PM
Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Californication
Posts: 647
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 229
Thanked 301 Times in 179 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1496
Rep Power: 0
pacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud of
I hope you're right Jetset about things not being doom and gloom. I just feel strongly that they will ramp up the morality police and get this done. When you consider the putrid state of the republican congress and the demise of the current republican president, they will be eager to garner any support they can from their right wing base. I sure hope you're right that they have a ways to go! On the other hand, with all the foolishness involving online gaming entities these days, I'm not sure alot of us out here will be up for a fight to save something that is becoming more and more clearly a rip off! I hope to see the day that Vegas biggies like Harrahs, MGM etc are allowed to offer their wares over the internet. Then at least I will have some degree of faith in the industry again. Either way, banned or not, online gambling will be viewed as a shady enterprise and thus the anti-gambling throngs will win no matter what.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11th June 2006, 06:27 PM
Renegade's Avatar
Dormant account
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 85
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 113
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 120
Rep Power: 0
Renegade is on a distinguished roadRenegade is on a distinguished road
The United States is turning into the very things that they claim they are trying to protect the world from....
More gestapo crap!! Hilter sure would be proud.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12th June 2006, 08:05 PM
lots0's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: My own private Idaho
Posts: 1,167
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 8 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 633
Thanked 706 Times in 380 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3572
Rep Power: 33
lots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond reputelots0 has a reputation beyond repute
The amount of hypocrisy seen in this action by Congress is staggering, almost beyond comprehension.

Yup, the hand writing is on the wall, it is only a matter of time before the Internet police start kicking down doors, stopping people on the street and ‘legally’ searching everyone to see if their laptop, ipod, blackberry, cell phone, USB memory stick or some other tech goodie has gambling software on it.

I wonder when the American people will realize that their real and true freedom is all but gone? We have allowed our own Government to scare us out of our freedom.

Under the Constitution, the government can not tell any citizen they can not gamble, if the person is in pursuit of happiness...

But the government no longer recognizes that American Citizens have the RIGHT to pursue happiness as guaranteed in the Constitution.

The Constitution and Bill of Rights has one and only one purpose, to limit the power of Government over its citizens.

When Government ignores the Constitution every American should stand up and demand a new Government.

Last edited by lots0; 12th June 2006 at 08:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lots0 For This Useful Post:
SlotsWizard (13th June 2006)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12th June 2006, 08:53 PM
Renegade's Avatar
Dormant account
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 85
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 113
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 120
Rep Power: 0
Renegade is on a distinguished roadRenegade is on a distinguished road
America isn't going to wake up.
And if it does, it'll be too late.
The Dumbing down of America started right after WW2.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13th June 2006, 03:34 PM
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 498
WTGs: 30
WTGd at 141 Times in 22 Posts
Thanks: 307
Thanked 860 Times in 178 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 4437
Rep Power: 36
Cynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond reputeCynthia777 has a reputation beyond repute
Let's just hope that the new proposal of H.R. 5474 (which develops a study commission on the aspects of online gambling and the U.S., before banning/making a final decision on the prohibition of Internet gambling in the U.S.) can delay the passing of H.R.4411 and H.R.4777. It was introduced one day prior (May 24) to those bills passing the subcommittee.

see link: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquer...9:HR05474:@@@X

Although this is new in going through the process of being fully legislated (as opposed to 4411 and 4777, which are approximately 1/3 of the way there before actually being passed), this bill has been considered and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and not "ordered to lie on the table" (i.e., put aside)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 13th June 2006, 04:04 PM
Less than Zero
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 6
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: -18
Rep Power: 0
luminouscarl tends to piss everyone off
Something must be done

I too, was once pro gambling. That is until I took a job in an offshore internet casino. The problem with internet gambling is that regulation in impossible. The industry continues to evolve into a complete criminal enterprise. Read my blog about my experiences. You may be surprised what you learn. http://carlhutton.eponym.com/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to luminouscarl For This Useful Post:
imkellye (11th July 2006)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk