Manhattan slots- here we go again

[chuchu59]

I have made countless w/ds from CWC casinos, sometimes from deposits with bonuses and a couple from free chips. I always enter the full amount withdrawable and let them deduct what should not be mine eg uncashable bonuses. They initially send you an email declining your whole w/d and then manually approve what you can withdraw. Unless the docs are not in order they dont normally reverse it back to your account. The op should not be blamed for not inserting the correct amount ie $300 as surely the cashier can work it out. Most probably the cashier messed up things again and took it that the docs were not in order. This happened to me several times at All Star Slots where they reversed all w/ds to my account every time although docs were in order. The op has to shoulder some of the blame for playing it back as he could have kicked up a big fuss if he won much more from the $300 and requested a larger cashout. However, Manhattan Slots should take some of the blame for unilaterally reversing the $300 which prompted the op to play it back. After their mistakes though I didnt play the money back they had the courtesy of awarding me free chips on several occasions for the hassles. I believe they might do the same this time.

I seriously disagree, however, that they should be thrown into the rogue pit though their course of action is highly undesirable.

[bpb]

I hope I am making sense. Playing and cashing out according to terms sometimes requires a lot of research, but if you are going to gamble online you need to make sure you understand T&C's.

No ... what you are saying makes no sense

[bpb]

I don't see why the casino should pay the money back, that OP chose to gamble, and lose, instead of withdrawing it.

No, the OP did not gamble with the $300. Gambling implies risking money with a potential to win something. The OP had no chance to win anything. He already had the maximum withdrawable amount in his account. The OP had no chance to win anything else. The only party with a chance to win was the casino.

The OP did make a withdrawal. The OP thought that the casino had processed a withdrawal. The casino didn't. The casino should never have returned any withdrawable balance to the OP's account.

The fact that the OP had NOTHING to gain from wagering those funds is very germane to this discussion. The fact that nobody in this thread acknowledges this is frustrating, and makes me believe that common sense has gone out to lunch.

If there was no max cashout restriction in place, then I would agree completely that the OP should not be paid anything.

[chuchu59]

Technicaaly the op did gamble with his own money as the bonus had already been removed with the cashable amount reversed back into the account against the player's will. If the op had built his balance to say 1k I would support his claim for the full 1k to be cashed out as the casino was at fault in the first place by reversing a perfectly legitimate cashout hence enticing a customer to play. Gamblers are usually not too disciplined except for that bloody KK and can easily be tempted to lose everything in their accounts