Club world out of control

[hurdle]

U know how much u would have to bet to win a single weeks payout at an rtg? Me neither. Let me say this though, I once hit a $1200 bonus round betting 6.25 a pull, and then once hit $1300 on a free spins feature of mystic dragon betting the same... Idk how casinos like bodog publish the winners they do. Must be some billionaire's in quebec playing for $6,250 a pull... Oh yeah, I once hit a $900 dollar round betting 2 bux at Gold Beard, but thats it... After mentioning all this, I am forgetting why I play at rtg's?

ummmm, you could bet $100 per hand on a table game and easilyl get to $3000 after a gambling session. do you know much about casino games other than slots?
You could also deposit 2000 to start with, thats another way to get to 3000 quick.

[3mptyseat]

ummmm, you could bet $100 per hand on a table game and easilyl get to $3000 after a gambling session. do you know much about casino games other than slots?
You could also deposit 2000 to start with, thats another way to get to 3000 quick.

I was merely being ironic given that RTG's have some of the lowest payouts. But your point is taken, and so let me shed some light on the subject. The fine, honest, willing-and-able-to-pay folks at the Club World Casino group will make arrangements to pay more than the $3000 a week with clients who make larger deposits...

I understand ur frustrated and I did not intend to fan the flames.

Here is one way to change the dpi. Open 'paint' that comes with windows. In the file menu, open 'from scanner or camera' and it should come up with this window I took a snippet of...



Now click the link that the arrow points to, and u should be able to enter the dpi u need... After that, click ok, and when you get back to the screen shown above, make sure the custom button is clicked...

Hope that helps.

Have you ever cashed out at Slots Jungle?

[vinylweatherman]

I have a normal scanner. How do I even know what "dpi" it is scanning in and how do I change it to 300 instead of whatever it is?

How is the casino going to compensate me for all the time they are taking me? I don't work for those jerks, yet they keep requiring me to do things for them without compensation.

Its all just bull crap. if it wasnt I wouldnt be angry. they should be rogued. If every other damn casino can read it, and I can read it and every other damn person that gets email can open and read it then why cant they? Why 4 phone calls asking the same questions? ROGUE and don't wanna pay is thier problem.

The allegation is that the image is too blurry, OK, fine.

1) Why is it NOT "too blurry" when "everybody else" looks at it?

If it is because CW have "crap viewing software", this is THEIR fault, not YOURS.
You need an independent evaluation of the quality of your document. The easist way to get this is ask Max to look at it. If you proceed to PAB he will see it anyway.

If Max agrees with CW that it looks "too blurry", accept this & try to figure out why.

It may be clear to you because you know what is on it, and your brain will compensate for any lack of clarity in the image. Max does NOT know what is on it, neither do CW, they have to be able to interpret the information from the image alone.

2) This "jargon" about 300dpi or not may NOT be how a "normal scanner" describes it unless you go into "custom" settings.

Often you will have simpler options, such as quality = low, mid, high.
You may also see "document mode" and "photo mode" as options. You actually want "photo mode", not the more logical "document mode" for sending documents to casinos. "document mode" is around 150dpi, but "photo mode" is around 300dpi. If you have the "quality" option instead, try "high". Access to these settings may not be obvious, especially if you have a newer scanner, which is designed to make the process as simple as possible for the user by pre-scanning the content and deciding which setting suits it best.

JPEG, and the other file types, are all compressed formats, and some definition is lost. TIFF is an actual "bitmap" file of the image, and is uncompressed. The drawback is that it is also very large. Windows will often show these files as type "BMP" (bitmap).

I have a scanner, and before my PC decided to stop communicating with it, I ALWAYS used "photo mode" for any documents I prepared for casinos, and always saved the results as a standard JPEG. This gave me 300dpi. I noticed that "document mode" was set to produce only 150dpi images, and they often looked "unclear" even to me.

Now I use a digital camera, and this has worked fine. It produces JPEG files directly, and being a camera, they are "photo mode" by default.

[chayton]

I usually scan everything at 300dpi and then drop it down to 150 and it's been fine everywhere. But in my experience it's best to scan your docs and then use winzip to zip them before sending - that way you don't have the problem of your email software trying to resize the files.

[oldtrvlagt]

Have you tried contacting the rep here on the forum? I was verified at CWC but played at Lucky Red last year and managed a good sized withdrawal. I went through the same .....too blurry, couldn't read, etc. I contacted the rep and he did get it taken care of. Don't beat your head against the wall and it isn't just these guys. At several Rivals (last year...not anymore since I gave up on them) I would email many times and finally ended up faxing what they wanted. Good luck but stay the course

[slotplayer]

dpi is dots per inch, the device prints more dots per inch so the dots are closer together thus the better the document or image quality.

[vinylweatherman]

I usually scan everything at 300dpi and then drop it down to 150 and it's been fine everywhere. But in my experience it's best to scan your docs and then use winzip to zip them before sending - that way you don't have the problem of your email software trying to resize the files.

This probably works better than scanning at 150dpi to start with. Software will usually be "intelligent" about how a 300dpi image is reduced to 150dpi.

My camera produces JPEG files of just under 1 Meg each. Size can be trimmed by trimming surplus border areas, HOWEVER, you need SOME border in order to define the document. Images cropped to the extent where parts, even blank parts, of the document itself are removed often get rejected.

If the email software is allowed to resize the files, what YOU see is NOT what ends up at the other end, so what is "clear" to start with, can become "blurry" when compressed by YOUR email software, and reinflated by THEIR software at the other end.

For the WORST POSSIBLE result, try faxing it from a public fax machine

[hurdle]

Thanks so much for the helpful replies, everyone. It is much appreciated.

....and guess what??

My documents were approved!!!

So, I learned a few things here. What an awesome and helpful community! I feel like 5000lbs are lifted off of my back now

[chayton]

This probably works better than scanning at 150dpi to start with. Software will usually be "intelligent" about how a 300dpi image is reduced to 150dpi.

My camera produces JPEG files of just under 1 Meg each. Size can be trimmed by trimming surplus border areas, HOWEVER, you need SOME border in order to define the document. Images cropped to the extent where parts, even blank parts, of the document itself are removed often get rejected.

If the email software is allowed to resize the files, what YOU see is NOT what ends up at the other end, so what is "clear" to start with, can become "blurry" when compressed by YOUR email software, and reinflated by THEIR software at the other end.

For the WORST POSSIBLE result, try faxing it from a public fax machine

My first 'graphic design' job was scanning billions of documents - stick the doc in the scanner, push the button, listen to a minute or two of hmmm-bah hmmm-bah, open the doc, clean all the boogers off, straighten it, drop the res, unsharp mask, save it, stick another one in and over and over and OVER for 8 hours a bloody day. Arrrgh....I did that for a year, I'm surprised that I left anyone alive.

But anyhow I'm pretty good at scanning but even I had an issue because of my driver's license - it's the only photo ID I have and it's from Arizona when they did that hologram thing. It's supposed to make it harder to counterfeit, but what it really does is peel off halfway in your wallet (taking some of your photo with it) and whatever's left reflects light. So if you scan or photograph it you get half washed out and the other half all glarey. I was having a hard time getting a decent scan when I first started playing online, and tried taking a photo and it was even worse - my DL pic looked like a zombie Dudley Moore. Seriously.

[P.V.]

My first 'graphic design' job was scanning billions of documents - stick the doc in the scanner, push the button, listen to a minute or two of hmmm-bah hmmm-bah, open the doc, clean all the boogers off, straighten it, drop the res, unsharp mask, save it, stick another one in and over and over and OVER for 8 hours a bloody day. Arrrgh....I did that for a year, I'm surprised that I left anyone alive.

But anyhow I'm pretty good at scanning but even I had an issue because of my driver's license - it's the only photo ID I have and it's from Arizona when they did that hologram thing. It's supposed to make it harder to counterfeit, but what it really does is peel off halfway in your wallet (taking some of your photo with it) and whatever's left reflects light. So if you scan or photograph it you get half washed out and the other half all glarey. I was having a hard time getting a decent scan when I first started playing online, and tried taking a photo and it was even worse - my DL pic looked like a zombie Dudley Moore. Seriously.

Current U.S. DL's and even Carry Permits are plastic with some type of laminate coating, or something else, so that shouldn't interfere with the OP's complaint. They won't peel, maybe crack.