Constant Losing at CLUBWORLD w/ HORRIBLE features

[CANADAMAN99]

Has anyone noticed how tight the slots are at Club World Casinos. I thought these guys were accredited with the Meister and from what I remember they even have a rep on here. How is this possible? Does anyone ever have any luck on there?

I have been playing with them for a couple months and I do have to say that they have been pretty amazing at customer service. Whats troubling however is going 200 spins without hitting bonus features. When I put on autospin and hit nothing within 200 spins you know something ain't right.

How in Gods name are these guys accredited? Even when you do hit a feature it seems like no matter what you wager, the win is always between 1 buck and 30 bucks. I cannot even count the number of times I've wagered a buck or more and the feature has yielded NOTHING. The features suck, the wins suck, the service is great, but good customer service isn't fun to spend.

Anyone else finding this to be true? I had WAYYYYYYY better luck playing at Rushmore Casino and they aren't even accredited. At least there I won.

[just play]

I could write the same about iNetBet.

Maybe try another RTG, there are quite a few.

The casino and everyone else here will say stop depositing, I seem to disagree with that a bit for the reason, if there is such a thing as RTP, someone would eventually hit no? How can one person deposit thousands without getting any kind of withdrawal??? (talking about myself here)

Things have changed at ALL casinos, some people agree, some don't. (I agree) the payouts have been the lowest I have ever seen. I mean I have NEVER seen all casino pay...ummm...not pay this bad.

I personally don't think being accredited matters in this situation.

[CANADAMAN99]

I could write the same about iNetBet.

Maybe try another RTG, there are quite a few.

The casino and everyone else here will say stop depositing, I seem to disagree with that a bit for the reason, if there is such a thing as RTP, someone would eventually hit no? How can one person deposit thousands without getting any kind of withdrawal??? (talking about myself here)

Things have changed at ALL casinos, some people agree, some don't. (I agree) the payouts have been the lowest I have ever seen. I mean I have NEVER seen all casino pay...ummm...not pay this bad.

I personally don't think being accredited matters in this situation.

Thanks and yeah I know people will tell me to stop playing but this is the complaint section and I am posting accordingly. I understand the consequences of playing and accept them. I just wonder about the fact that being "accredited" may mean nothing more than "Not absolute crooks".

I think the issue is not that I lose, Ive been losing for years LOL. My issue comes with the fact that If I play at an accredited casino, I would expect fair gaming. And I don't feel like fair gaming is going.

I have been playing for quite a while and have to agree that the casinos these days are just plain bad. We don't really have a chance any more and while that has taken a lot of the fun out of it, there's still a little fun left. There's still that 1 in a million chance that you'll hit a small jackpot. And its fun. I'd probably be better off playing The lottery though, must have better odds.

[Nifty29]

Depending on which slot u play it is not uncommon to wait 200+ spins for a feature and it's not unusual to get small payouts. However, I've also had 3000xbet on features so if you want the big you have to take the small.

As far as rtp being 'the lowest ever', I suggest that people use the wayback machine over the past 10 years at the CM forums and read all the exact same complaints about the rtp being lowered and no features etc etc etc. So, if their opinion is as valid as yours then nobody would be winning at all and the rtp would be down to about 7%
.....and the winner screenshots will prove that to be way off.

Players need to remember that rtp is calculated on a complete cycle of all reel combinations and is not personal or 'per player '. In fact, given most players will never experience all combinations (especially the Max payout ) then it isn't surprising that people don't feel like the rtps are 'right' , because for them personally it probably is much lower.

[silcnlayc]

kuschman03:I just wonder about the fact that being "accredited" may mean nothing more than Not absolute crooks".

This is an interesting view...I think I am likely to have to agree with this simply because I, too feel as if many have become close enough to thievery and less than fair in the last few years.

Nifty29: I suggest that people use the wayback machine over the past 10 years at the CM forums and read all the exact same complaints

Um, Nifty, I will have to disagree here. I just pulled up all non bonus complaints and the first one shows as of 2006 that I can find with setting my settings up with the oldest thread started first. So if this is correct, then you are way off. Have earlier posts on non bonus complaints disappeared? If so, then I still have to disagree with you on this. Most complaints started at the time of the announcement of the UIGEA and thereafter IMO. I cannot find one that was started any earlier. I found other complaints starting in 2002 but not about bonus rounds or pay in bonus rounds.


So all in all, I am still surprised you are holding to the fact that

Depending on which slot u play it is not uncommon to wait 200+ spins for a feature and it's not unusual to get small payouts

This too was not true until the last few years. Again, to make it sound like 200 or more spins for a feature is "normal" is not really a fact IMO...and to continue to claim this, also does no service to the players IMO.

I just went under the section of Online Casinos and found the only issues there from 2002 were either cashout or free chips or casinos closing..so as to the bonus rounds vs bonus wins or lack of thereof , they have pretty much started during the transition which does show things HAVE changed drastically.

If you can find or point me to a different time frame, then that would help in your continuous claims of "nothing has changed " with online casinos. Otherwise, I feel you really have no "proof" that they have not changed.

Things have changed at ALL casinos, some people agree, some don't. (I agree) the payouts have been the lowest I have ever seen. I mean I have NEVER seen all casino pay...ummm...not pay this bad..

I also agree with you on this.

I will accept to be corrected...by anyone without being offended...


.

[CANADAMAN99]

Thanks to all for the feedback. It is all welcome and helpful.

[QUOTE=Nifty29;391542]Depending on which slot u play it is not uncommon to wait 200+ spins for a feature and it's not unusual to get small payouts. However, I've also had 3000xbet on features so if you want the big you have to take the small.

I do have to disagree with this. I feel like it is not common at all to have to go through 200+ spins for a feature. Or at least not up until this point in gaming history. Playing in the real casinos where there is actual law being sanctioned I seldom have seen this in my experience. That's not to say I haven't had bad runs ( Possible bad wording...) but at least when I lose at a land based casino I know that I am getting a fair chance. In addition, when I'm betting $1 spins, and I finally do hit a feature, I expect some kind of winning.

As far as the winner screenshots, which I love looking at, I think this represents a extraordinary small percentage of players. Do realize the amount of screenshots that are posted per month in regards to the number of people playing? There is an incredibly small number of people posting there and who's to say that some of them aren't fraudulent?

I just wish there were a casino that would be OK making a little bit less and letting the player win a little bit more. I think one of the main issues here is the criteria that goes into an accredited casino. Do they players get any say in this?

[mattsgame]

Thanks to all for the feedback. It is all welcome and helpful.

Depending on which slot u play it is not uncommon to wait 200+ spins for a feature and it's not unusual to get small payouts. However, I've also had 3000xbet on features so if you want the big you have to take the small.

I do have to disagree with this. I feel like it is not common at all to have to go through 200+ spins for a feature. Or at least not up until this point in gaming history. Playing in the real casinos where there is actual law being sanctioned I seldom have seen this in my experience. That's not to say I haven't had bad runs ( Possible bad wording...) but at least when I lose at a land based casino I know that I am getting a fair chance. In addition, when I'm betting $1 spins, and I finally do hit a feature, I expect some kind of winning.

As far as the winner screenshots, which I love looking at, I think this represents a extraordinary small percentage of players. Do realize the amount of screenshots that are posted per month in regards to the number of people playing? There is an incredibly small number of people posting there and who's to say that some of them aren't fraudulent?

I just wish there were a casino that would be OK making a little bit less and letting the player win a little bit more. I think one of the main issues here is the criteria that goes into an accredited casino. Do they players get any say in this?

So are you saying Casinomeister should only make casinos accredited based on players feed back of winning or losing?

Like you have just mentioned about the screenshots (Bolded Above). Then you should also note that there are 100's of 1000's that play that do not frequently visit Casinomeister, so who is to say these people are not winning?

I have not played RTG in a long time because I did not like my playtime there so I can understand your frustration. But to suggest that because you had a bad run or several players do that they should not be Accredited is absurd.

I can also tell you that just because you had a win at Rushmore there will be 5 threads or complaints that people are losing to your 1 win.

Just to add, for me personally I can 200 spins+ on any casino software and not hit a feature,freespins etc e.g MGS,3Dice etc.

as for b&m being different I'am still not convinced on this yet, Might just be my personal experience but I can go on just as bad a run there than online.
No feature not winning more than 10x bet. Not to mention our slots over here are usually set to a worse RTP to online slots ( if you believe what is posted )

Anyway I think I'am ranting so that will be all.

Cheers
Matt

[Mavin1]

Good points made here and I would add that as Mattsgame is stating the criteria for being Accredited, I think should just cover the assurance of "if", you win, you will get paid, timely and reasonable and what ever else goes along with being accredited.
This is a way of separating the paying casinos, regarding wins, from the non paying.

As far as how the play is for the player individually, well this is between the casino and the player. If you buy a product and aren't happy with it, then return, or never buy it again.

I am not saying this to jump to the other side of the fence, just have seen from my short time here that our complaints, that are legitimate, will never be resolved. So one by one, I had eliminated the casinos from my computer and my life. I will rarely go back and play a small amount, but the casinos could have been getting more from me as they would with all players.

So it all boils down to, do they care what we think about the return, I say no, as long as players play and keep paying in to a one sided system, then why should they change? It's works for them, so who cares if it works for us as long as others continue to believe gambling is a righteous venture.

I was talking to my mother in laws nurse today and she was telling me about what she had learned from an employee at the local land based casino here. He said that everytime a player uses the club card, it resets the machines, when a player comes to a machine that the previous player was at and plays without the club card, then the machine continues building the play as if it were on the previous player. She and her family stopped using the card and have had much better success at playing.

So for land based, we players that use the club cards are sharking ourselves, by resetting the machine everytime you slip it in the slot.

With online casinos, who knows what they do, but it's like it resets constantly and we have to start all over again everytime we log on or get booted or get updates or what ever.

The trend these days has taken a different direction in the way the freespin and bonus rounds now play. Freespin rounds and Bonus rounds used to mean something, now all they mean is a few spins you don't have to pay for, that's your instant reward.


Definition:



bo·nus   /ˈboʊnəs/ Show Spelled
[boh-nuhs] Show IPA

–noun, plural -nus·es.
1. something given or paid over and above what is due.
2. a sum of money granted or given to an employee, a returned soldier, etc., in addition to regular pay, usually in appreciation for work done, length of service, accumulated favors, etc.
3. something free, as an extra dividend, given by a corporation to a purchaser of its securities.
4. a premium paid for a loan, contract, etc.
5. something extra or additional given freely: Every purchaser of a pound of coffee received a box of cookies as a bonus.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1765–75; < L: good


—Synonyms
1. reward, honorarium, gift. 2. Bonus, bounty, premium refer to something extra beyond a stipulated payment. A bonus is a gift to reward performance, paid either by a private employer or by a government: a bonus based on salary; a soldiers' bonus. A bounty is a public aid or reward offered to stimulate interest in a specific purpose or undertaking and to encourage performance: a bounty for killing wolves. A premium is usually something additional given as an inducement to buy, produce, or the like: a premium received with a magazine subscription.

[silcnlayc]

Mavin1: Good points made here and I would add that as Mattsgame is stating the criteria for being Accredited, I think should just cover the assurance of "if", you win, you will get paid, timely and reasonable and what ever else goes along with being accredited.
This is a way of separating the paying casinos, regarding wins, from the non paying.

As far as how the play is for the player individually, well this is between the casino and the player. If you buy a product and aren't happy with it, then return, or never buy it again.

Yes, Mavin, excellent point made which I should have added too. I also believe that being accredited only gives you a sense of assurance you will be paid....if you should ever win again... even if I feel that even they (the accredited) have one foot on land and the other on the slippery slope of ruin with thier actions of todays (recently)...

.

[nisosbar]

I was talking to my mother in laws nurse today and she was telling me about what she had learned from an employee at the local land based casino here. He said that everytime a player uses the club card, it resets the machines, when a player comes to a machine that the previous player was at and plays without the club card, then the machine continues building the play as if it were on the previous player. She and her family stopped using the card and have had much better success at playing.

So for land based, we players that use the club cards are sharking ourselves, by resetting the machine everytime you slip it in the slot.

Thank you for this. I asked this question earlier this summer, and no one replied, so I am glad to get this confirmed. I suspected as much.