
Originally Posted by
Mavin1
One can say Skiny and those of us that have complained now and in the past are sore losers, need to move on if we aren't happy and so on, I don't find a problem with that. But to say a poster has "O" credibility is a personal attack because someone doesn't like what he said, that's not necessary.
Having a negative rant does not say that Skiny or anyone else is calling casinos criminals, but thinking is still stuck in that narrow vision of what a rant is.
In a previous post of mine, I stated that not allowing members to vent their frustrations of how up and down a casino can be, gives readers that may be green in the gambling field, a false perception of gambling returns at any one casino.
If you have only Kudos and praises all over the forum for Accredited casinos, then you are presenting youselves as shills of another kind. New players read these threads, run to these casinos with the idea that Accredited means hot! This is not the case, but they only learn this after playing for some time and find that no one casino is hot, but any one casino can have it hot streaks.
So I say, in forum discussions, because this is what this is, discussions about players experiences and such, not just free advertisment by the happy players, gives balance to a sometimes very unbalanced pastime.
Players new and old should be able to understand that "Accredited", means reliable and trustworthy in how they deal with the player, answering questions, keeping personal information private, paying players and paying in a timely manner and has a rep on the forum available if the need arises.
Accredited, does not mean a hot, loose casino, by any means, thus balance in discussions, should not be discouraged unless it is way out of line.
JMO
Bookmarks