Beted.com said they arent paying me

[vinylweatherman]

the casino emailed me and said they refunded my deposit when i thought my bank had already done the chargeback which seemed too fast. luckily and to my surprise, they offered me , my deposit back which already hit my bank , and $600 CASH today if i signed something saying this is the final resolution to the matter and i took it. im shocked they gave me this but its the right thing. Casinos should verify deposits or players upfront before they let them play, like require a simple fax of drviers license or id, so this doesnt happen. They wouldnt have offered me this $600 profit if they didnt think they were somewhat wrong. they still shouldnt be taking online checks, not one other place can anyone name here that does for USA players, only a few poker places, not casinos/sportbooks like they do.

Pity, looks like you would have got the full $2500 if you had gone down the PAB route. They would NOT have even offered $600 if they believed you were trying to defraud them. They probably already knew that you ruined your chances for a PAB by making these threats, and decided to offer $600 to get rid of you, rather than have you continue.

Unfortunately, this could also give others the impression they "paid you off" BECAUSE of the threats, something they may regret in time.

[bernynhel]

Pity, looks like you would have got the full $2500 if you had gone down the PAB route. They would NOT have even offered $600 if they believed you were trying to defraud them. They probably already knew that you ruined your chances for a PAB by making these threats, and decided to offer $600 to get rid of you, rather than have you continue.

Unfortunately, this could also give others the impression they "paid you off" BECAUSE of the threats, something they may regret in time.

Uh, who is going to get the impression that they paid cupojoe off because of the threats and at exactly what time were they born yesterday?

If that's even remotely possible, can't there just be a note somewhere, or something?

NOTE - ANYONE READING THIS AND UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THEY PAID CUPOJOE OFF BECAUSE OF THE THREATS: KNOCK IT OFF!!!

[vinylweatherman]

Uh, who is going to get the impression that they paid cupojoe off because of the threats and at exactly what time were they born yesterday?

If that's even remotely possible, can't there just be a note somewhere, or something?

NOTE - ANYONE READING THIS AND UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THEY PAID CUPOJOE OFF BECAUSE OF THE THREATS: KNOCK IT OFF!!!

What I couldn't figure out was why the $600. He either won $2500, or he didn't. They had two clear options, return the deposits, or pay the winnings. This looks like they got into the trap of trying to "negotiate" when they initially had no intention whatsoever to pay the winnings, because terms were breached. The last time a casino tried this to get out of paying a legitimate player was Joyland, who tricked a player into accepting half of her huge $4M+ jackpot in a "full and final settlement", because they tried to enforce a staged payment schedule that would otherwise have taken decades. It seemed Joyland also wanted this big win "off the books", and for less than face value, and shortly after this the casino changed hands. There are STILL unanswered questions in this case, and the CURRENT case looks like a player who was genuinely legitimate, but VERY impatient, and went about pursuing their claim in the wrong manner.

Once the threat was made, and the deposits charged back, the casino should have offered NOTHING, since at this point, the player most certainly DID breach the terms and conditions, and further, made it impossible to "unwind" what he had done.
Whatever WE think, this player, if NOT legit, could go bragging about getting "paid off" by being offered part payment of the proceeds of "abusing" multiple accounts BECAUSE of the way he pursued the claim.

There is a very similar thread regarding Mayflower casino. Player makes complaint, and then starts the threats, in this case, buying up similar web domains, and threatening to publish negatively about the business. Mayflower casino did NOT offer a partial settlement, they contacted Max to say they would like this dispute to go through the PAB process, in spite of how the player handled it. Now, Mayflower are back in the driving seat, the player has to put up, or shut up. No PAB, or a failed PAB, will have him branded a "rogue player", and whatever he does with those domains, will NOT make Casinomeister members think the casino is bad, in fact, the more "crap" that is published on these domains, the less likely it is to be taken seriously.