I'll get right to the point. I tried to get this sorted out with their manager in private, but that doesn't appear to be going anywhere. I played at Crystal Palace and received their first deposit bonus, and lost everything, deposit and bonus, $0 in my account.
I deposit again and claim the second deposit. Their terms and conditions say that you can't have any balance in your account when you claim the second bonus, and I remember checking my account balance right before I deposited just to make sure.
SO, I go on to win almost $900 in addition to the bonus I received. And when I try to withdraw, after fulfilling all of their terms, I'm told that ALL of my winnings, and the bonus are being confiscated by the casino, because I had a balance of $60 when I deposited.
On to Montana Disputes we go. I file the dispute, and apparently as soon as the casino made their counterclaim, they closed the case, even though I dispute several facts of their case. They claimed that there was a balance of $60 in my account one week BEFORE I deposited, but AFTER I lost all of my money from the first deposit. They're claiming they have an "auto-cashback" feature, that puts money into your account somehow, even though there's no mention of it on the website, and the money wasn't showing up on my balance (which said "0") when I deposited.
So, there are several compounding problems and arguments which make the casinos claim pretty dubious in my mind:
1. There was no balance in my account when I deposited. I'm willing to assume that this is simply a computer glitch or inadvertant human error until I see evidence otherwise, but there definitely was no money in my account.
2. Even if there was a balance in my account, the terms and conditions at Crystal Palace don't have a clause, like many online casinos, that says something to the effect of "if you violate the terms of this bonus, the bonus amount will be forfeited".
3. Even furthermore, assuming I was ineligible to receive the bonus, there is nothing in their terms about losing winnings if you violate their terms and conditions. So again, even if there was a balance, there's entitling them to confiscate the $900 or so in winnings; they're only entitled to confiscate the bonus money.
Like I said earlier, I hope this can get worked out without any allegations of cheating or lying, but needless to say I am very upset about being denied over $1000 on a minor technicality, which I didn't even violate. And I think Montana Disputes needs to re-think how they gather information and make rulings, because there was absolutely no chance for me to dispute the claims of the casino.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks