Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > Online Casino and Poker Complaints > Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues

Notices

Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues Complaints concerning operational issues, fraud, non-payment, spammers, evil operators and players etc., are to be posted here

View Poll Results: Is English Harbour guilty of cheating on double up?
I am satisfied with their defense...only a bug 7 10.77%
Cheated in April and most likely cheated before 41 63.08%
Only cheated once, but was caught 4 6.15%
still unsure 13 20.00%
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll until you register in our forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 7th June 2006, 11:20 PM
GrandMaster's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,208
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 141
Thanked 679 Times in 398 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3681
Rep Power: 49
GrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond repute
What about the option "It is quite possibly a mistake, but I am not satisfied with their response"?
__________________
"The voice of reason"
http://mb.winneronline.com moderator
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 7th June 2006, 11:32 PM
spearmaster's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 5,333
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 3 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 266
Thanked 533 Times in 312 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3325
Rep Power: 15
spearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandMaster
What about the option "It is quite possibly a mistake, but I am not satisfied with their response"?
LOL. Here's your answer:

Quote:
Originally Posted by kengam
put up another poll if you guys want. This one suits my purpose.
In other words, your option wouldn't suit his purpose.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 8th June 2006, 11:17 PM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 121
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 40
Thanked 28 Times in 20 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 99
Rep Power: 22
kengam is on a distinguished road
That option is fine. In fact the other question suggestions are also fine. I do not know how to edit my poll. "my purpose" is merely to establish whether I am the only one who believes that they have cheated before. One other poster and I seem to be the vocal ones who think they have been cheated in the past.

I have no agenda except to expose these cheats. I am out a bunch of money. I am sorry you do not have much support in your conclusion Spearmaster, but people have a genuine mistrust in casinos in general. When one is caught cheating by mathematical probabilities then it only fuels further mistrust. If the original poster emailed English Harbour in the beginning and never started a thread which caused such an uproar, do you honestly think the casino would have researched and fixed the problem? Hell no. He would have received the canned bullshit response that they tried to give us publicly when this was brought to their attention.

I find it disgusting the way they have handled the entire situation. They could have at least published their logs from years past. They have refused to send me my own logs let alone the complete logs of the double up game. What does that tell you? I know what it tells me.

While I appreciate your time and interest in this important matter, I do not think you have helped the gaming public out at all with this one. You defended them into silence. You spoke for them when you shouldn't have. You have a great track record and have helped many people out in the past, but you clearly screwed us out of finding out the truth in this one.
__________________
kengam
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 8th June 2006, 11:22 PM
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 957
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 117
Thanked 263 Times in 156 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1469
Rep Power: 24
soflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud ofsoflat has much to be proud of
Quote:
They have refused to send me my own logs let alone the complete logs of the double up game. What does that tell you? I know what it tells me.
Did they refuse or just ignore your request?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 9th June 2006, 12:45 AM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 121
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 40
Thanked 28 Times in 20 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 99
Rep Power: 22
kengam is on a distinguished road
I guess I should have said ignored my request
__________________
kengam
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 9th June 2006, 01:49 AM
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 423
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 45
Thanked 96 Times in 49 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 758
Rep Power: 22
mitch is a splendid one to beholdmitch is a splendid one to beholdmitch is a splendid one to beholdmitch is a splendid one to beholdmitch is a splendid one to beholdmitch is a splendid one to beholdmitch is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by kengam
I guess I should have said ignored my request
Kengam

I must admit I have had an issue with your fairly constant questioning of Spears integrity, not acceptable IMO unless you can post evidence rather than speculation.

I have no probs with your questioning of EH and Oddson integrity as there is evidence out there.

I am glad you have followed up on my earlier suggestion of asking EH for your logs as I think the level of your past play would settle the issue of a previous cheating game.

If EH do refuse to release your logs then it is game over as far as I am concerned on the question of deliberate cheating by this group unless they can provide cast iron proof on why they are unable to do so.

Please keep us posted on your attempts to get your logs.

Mitch
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 9th June 2006, 02:27 AM
Banned User - repetitive violations of posting rule 1.6
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,674
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 141 Times in 64 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 0
Rep Power: 0
caruso seems to be zero at this point
64% in support of the "cheated now and quite possibly cheated before" option????

Damn, who'd o' thunk it??

Come on, hands up the 8% (4) of you who believe it was an accidental "bug". Name 'n shame.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 9th June 2006, 03:11 AM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 202
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 25
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 64
Rep Power: 12
henryVIII has been spending a lot of time in the forum
Quote:
Originally Posted by caruso
64% in support of the "cheated now and quite possibly cheated before" option????

Damn, who'd o' thunk it??

Come on, hands up the 8% (4) of you who believe it was an accidental "bug". Name 'n shame.
I was thinking just that. How can four people, after all we have read, believe it was an innocent mistake.

Bizarre.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 9th June 2006, 05:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 38
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 32
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 35
Rep Power: 28
erp1 is on a distinguished road
I agree with those that argue that the present poll is not very well thought out.

I think a poll with the following options in a more reasonable way would represent the different opinions.

What is your general impression of English Harbour casino?

1. Can still be trusted although they made a seriously bad mistake
2. Not recommended
3. Rogue, unethical business practice
4. Rogue, reported cheating software
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 9th June 2006, 05:28 PM
chuchu59's Avatar
gambling addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Posts: 2,858
WTGs: 27
WTGd at 11 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 588
Thanked 1,397 Times in 801 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 7582
Rep Power: 69
chuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by caruso
64% in support of the "cheated now and quite possibly cheated before" option????

Damn, who'd o' thunk it??

Come on, hands up the 8% (4) of you who believe it was an accidental "bug". Name 'n shame.

Aww, come on Caruso. This is a poll and those who take part can choose any option they like. Otherwise, who would dare take part in these again if they knew they would be chided over their choice.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mathematical Proof that English Harbour is cheating thelawnet Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues 827 2nd August 2006 05:43 PM
English Harbour Expands Executive Team Casinomeister Casino Industry Discussion 0 22nd December 2004 06:07 PM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk