
Originally Posted by
pokerdan
Technically they are not grand prive. They run their own site independent of grand prive. If you go to Grand Prive it is not listed as a Grand Prive site. However, neither is big dollar casino, but when I called big dollar they answered the phone as Grand Prive and when I asked them if they are part of Grand Prive they said "NO" LOL.. anyhow this site may have been Grand Prive in the past, but they have a totally seperate loyalty club that is not connected with Grand Prive.
I got contacted from Villa Fortuna and they said there are no problems with my funds and they are available to withdraw whenever i want once i send my documents. I know there have been a lot of complaints about betonsoft, but I have never heard anyone say anything bad about being paid and the customer service is outstanding at all these sites. As far as Grand prive is concerned, i do not generally play there at all, but did receive the fancy magazine in the mail today from them lol.. I also think Grand Prive isn't as bad as everyone claims they are, at least not anymore. And there was no advertisement in their magazine for Villa Fortuna...
Technically, that's Bollocks
Of course they are - they passed all my personal details over to Villa Fortuna and pretty much opened an account for me there, probably part of their crafty strategy to shaft affiliates by moving at least the non-US players over to Villa Fortuna. When someone brought this up on Casinomeister, they were contacted by Grand Prive, and asked to remove the thread because they didn't want Villa Fortuna to become public knowledge. Tough for them, as the policy here is NOT to rewrite history.
Same trick with Big Dollar. Player details are shared, and this can ONLY happen when all these casinos are run by the same operator, and as far as I am concerned, the ONLY thing that has changed since then is the software.
Get bonus banned at Grand Prive, and you are bonus banned at Villa Fortuna and Big Dollar too - clear evidence of the level of information sharing between so called independent operators.
Despite this, the OP has presented evidence of malpractice, whereby he won from a deposit bonus with no max cashout, but the casino slipped the small amount won from the free spins into the account in order to retrospectively cancel part of the winnings from the free spin bonus.
Despite what they tried to tell Bryan about them having changed managers and business practice, this shows that they have done nothing of the sort, and cases such as this demonstrate that the membership were right in their majority vote that they should NOT be allowed out of the pit based on the promises made by what turned out to be an affiliate manager, rather than the owners.
Now, they don't seem bothered enough to behave for another year, and ask again.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks