What was the date of that email?
![]() |
![]() |
What was the date of that email?
That is the kind of bombardment you get from the Virtual group. If you are not tempted, the offers go from the merely ridiculous to the realm of fantasy.
Although not part of Virtual at the time, Crystal Palace started sending me offers, and the more I ignored them, the sillier they got.
The weekends I could deposit $10,000 and have $20,000 for free. I could then do this FOUR MORE TIMES, and if I STILL didn't win on Saturday, I could do all this AGAIN on Sunday.
Next weekend? Same again
Later, it got REALLY silly...................
Eventually, I took a $30 free chip to play the then new "Aztec Treasure". I managed to get it up to $150, the MIMIMUM required for withdrawal. As expected, the withdrawal was denied for vague reasons, but at least the silly offers died away.
I am STILL getting offers from the others for free chips though, even though this is NOT allowed under their rules, and taking ANOTHER free chip without depositing in any of their casinos will forever result in problems should I be STUPID enough to actually PLAY there for real money
This casino is trying to convince us they ONLY found out you were a "serial abuser" once you had won for the first time, yet the rep has admitted for all to see that they had prior knowledge that you were an abuser, and were actively "watching" you. This makes this action premeditated, and they were thefefore FRAUDULENTLY accepting your bets having ALREADY decided that your strategy was "abusive", and that you would NOT be paid if you ended up winning.
They WILL return deposits though, because this means you CANNOT then issue a "chargeback" in law, because they have already "refunded your purchases". Chargebacks were designed to protect consumers in retail transactions, and are limited to a refund of the price paid. They are NOT suited to getting redress for a gambling debt resulting from a voided win.
An alternative to a chargeback is to lodge an "adverse merchant report" with the card organisation concerned (probably VISA) on the basis that the merchant acted in "bad faith" in taking your bets whilst never having the intention to honour a winning outcome. Unlike a chargeback, they cannot "blacklist" you for this, since it is merely a complaint, in the same way that a PAB is a complaint.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
If i remeber correct it was end of July some days before i was lucky to win with their crap bonuses and they ripped off all my winnings .What was the date of that email?
I checked their site and it seems there is no adress . If someone has information like telephonenumber of management or registered adress of their office in curacao please contact me .
Maybe its not helpful but i would like to report this issue and the circumstances it was managed directly to Rival . I cannot believe Rival is not interestet in rogue operators like "TIS" "Orange gamezz" or "Slots of fortune" damage their reputation .
Guys do you now a gaming authority in Curacao ?
I found CIGA but they dont have Sof at their site ......
Well i think the authoritiers are not helpful either but i doing nothing is no option for me .
You deceived the wrong person Slots of fortune !!!
Smile, it may never happen...
KasinoKing's News < Rival release their first ever 50-line slot.
SIX new softwares to try ~ Reel Layouts and Jackpot Odds ~ New USA Friendly Casinos!
........and the silence is deafening.
Meanwhile, why not try another Rival white label......they come fully Not Recommended by CM himself!
Don't worry though. It's not like they're rogue or anything.
Smile, it may never happen...
KasinoKing's News < Rival release their first ever 50-line slot.
SIX new softwares to try ~ Reel Layouts and Jackpot Odds ~ New USA Friendly Casinos!
There is a small update at this issue :
Sof now contactet Bryan and want to try to find a resolution for both parties .
Lets see what happens.
Jasminebed (30th November 2010)
Obviously an "advantage player", but so long as he keeps within the terms of each offer, he should be paid. The onus is on the CASINO to not make these offers in the first place if they believe Heador will beat them consistently.
They are greedy, they want his money when he loses, and know that they can always "pull a stunt" when he wins, so it is a no-risk way for the casino to guarantee that they will never LOSE to Heador, but without denying themselves the chance to WIN from him should his "advantage play systems" not work.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks