Palace Group Rules Shenanigans

[lots0]

This has been a perfect example of why we NEED Regulation.

Any casino management can go 'bad' given the right circumstances.

If this casino uses the excuse that they are not paying, simply because the person that got ripped offed by them had the balls to complain in public...

Then the casino management are a REAL bunch of crooks that deserve to be put in jail.

If these clip joint casinos and their criminal minded management don't like their ripoffs made public then they should not rip people off in the first place...

Don't forget that this whole thing was a ripoff designed by the casino management from the start...

The terms were IMPOSSIBLE to meet and they knew it... obviously blatant theft by the casino from start to finish.

BTW Bryan - You can't Blackmail the innocent...

[Pinababy69]

I've certainly lost lots of bonuses there in the past playing large-ish hands.

Palace Group: I'm sorry for unintentionally breaking your terms when I busted out. Will Neteller be alright for my refunds?

Let us know when they refund your deposits Liquuid. I'll check back later.

Yet another post about how there is problems with rogue casinos...we know and all we got to say is we told you so...

Did you even read this whole thread? This is NOT a rogue casino, or at least they weren't. This was one of the absolute best casinos/casino groups out there. That's what is most disturbing IMO.

EDIT: After reading Lots0's posts, I wanted to clarify my own comment regarding blackmail. I do agree there are players who will try and use this forum and others to sway public opinion and influence a casino's decision...even when it is obvious that the player is in the wrong. But you know, as Lots0 said, you can't blackmail the innocent. In this case, I personally do not view the casino as innocent, and don't believe they left the OP with any other choice. Just wanted to make sure that I made it clear that I do believe there are players who will try and use a "blackmail" type tactic...it happens. And people usually see right through it....or I hope so anyway.

[chuchu59]

Anybody want to make any side bets that this thread and google will now cost Spin Palace at least 10X over what it would have cost them just to pay the OP originally..

Jeeze Rob, you are so conservative. I reckon it will be 100x at least.

[RobWin]

Jeeze Rob, you are so conservative. I reckon it will be 100x at least.

LOL Chu, you are most likely right my friend and the damn thing about the whole issue is that it was senseless of Spin Palace to let this escape their powers to settle it quick and keep this issue quite. They used to be a great casino IMO and I also played there a lot back in the day.

[lots0]

I don't want to hijack the thread... but only casinos that real are cheaters need to worry about being "Blackmailed" on forum boards like this.

The honest casinos behave quite differently when false accusations are leveled at them... The casino, Bryan and the regulars here come out and expose the poster as a fraud... I have seen it happen here many many times.

Then thread that started out in an attempt to 'blackmail' the casino ends up being a very positive advertisement for the casino...

[Casinomeister]

...As soon as you post in a message board trying to whip up public support and damage a company's reputation, it looks like blackmail from the casino's perspective, and in most cases they will drop any consideration of paying winnings....

This was a general sweeping comment that applies to when people post complaints in message boards. It wasn't intended to be thread specific.

[spiderlegz]

And a reminder to those who promote Palace Group.

If they treat their players like this, how will they treat their affiliates?

Sorry, I had to.

[Casinomeister]

And a reminder to those who promote Palace Group.

If they treat their players like this, how will they treat their affiliates?

Sorry, I had to.

I think a better worded (specific) comment would be, "If they treat a player who broke their terms and conditions like this, how would they treat an affiliate who breaks a similar one?"

And lest we forget - most affiliates are players.

[spiderlegz]

I think a better worded (specific) comment would be, "If they treat a player who broke their terms and conditions like this, how would they treat an affiliate who breaks a similar one?"

And lest we forget - most affiliates are players.

As stated by an overwhelming majority a totally unfair term. As was the term a certain group used a while ago..

[Pinababy69]

And a reminder to those who promote Palace Group.

If they treat their players like this, how will they treat their affiliates?

Sorry, I had to.

None of this is the least bit funny Spider, but you made me chuckle. It's the irony. After you posted about the term in the Grand Prive affy contract, I posted the actual term. You know....the management reserves the right to blah, blah (FU clause). The reply I got was that those terms are standard in every contract, but that they would never hold up in a court of law. No kidding they wouldn't.....problem is, exactly which court of law do you complain to? I sure would like to know so that this player can file suit.