
Originally Posted by
oldtrvlagt
One would assume, like you did, that you would get a 200 bonus...are you saying they only gave you 100? That stinks

That is correct
This is why I believe the wording misleading by omission. I deposited £400, and expected to be given "50% up to 200", but it turns out to be 50% up to 100. It's the fact that the misleading headline is featured at several points on the newsletter. The free 15 was indeed 15.
It would have only required a couple of extra words, or a rewording of the text, to make the correct offer clear.
In long form, they could have said "purchase up to 200 and receive a 50% bonus". They could have used the short form "50% up to 100".
This is simply psychological trickery, similar to those "$1000 free and 60 minutes - keep your winnings" offers, carefully worded to tempt in the player.
There are not even any special terms and conditions, the link to terms and conditions simply loads up the page for the SUB offer, so no further specifics are available.
There are also regular newsletters sent out at the weekends, but these differ in that plenty ofr wording is used to make it clear how the bonus is to be calculated, and indeed 100 credits is available EVERY weekend, so this is NOT a special festive extra, it is simply 100 bonus granted at a festively enhanced 50%, rather than the more usual 20%.
By thinking I had a better offer than I had, I "wasted" deposits and turned down other offers on the table that also expired at midnight yesterday. Worse still, in wagering my deposit 1x to get the bonus (normally required, but no mention of it, CS told me LAST time I used one of these newsletter offers), the games played worse than ever still. 10 consecutive LOSING hands at 3 card poker, followed by a "push". This kind of opening seems far too common, it should be quite RARE to see an opening like this, yet it has happened more than half a dozen times over the holidays, so "wasting" £400 deposits when I could have "wasted" £200 for the same offer is maddening. (I had this offer at two of their casinos). The £400 I "wasted" could have gone to one of two other casinos, and lesser offers, but with a greater chance of finding a "hot" casino among 4.
Now it is not just a matter of "needing a lawyer" to understand the terms, but needing a psychologist to look for clever wording trying to make an offer look better than it is.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks