Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Microgaming Classic BlackJack

  1. #1
    poser is offline Experienced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Hamburg
    Posts
    221
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 44 Times in 22 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Reputation Points: 255

    Microgaming Classic BlackJack

    Hi,

    is anyone out there, that ever has had a good or just normal BJ session on Microgamigs Classic BJs, when playing on a bonus ?

    Since some time I take loose track of my play on this game(s), when I'm on a bonus.

    I have literally never had a winning session there, out of at least 30 or more.

    Its just too strange. 10 min ago was my last one, the dealer won or pushed 26 out of 32 hands.

    And it is always the same here. The last 3 times, I really only played it, because I wanted to show myself this is just my bad luck, but wow, it goes on like it.

  2. #2
    winbig's Avatar
    winbig is offline mmmm, Foxy.
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes You
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,229
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks
    1,371
    Thanked 3,608 Times in 2,120 Posts
    Rep Power
    166
    Reputation Points: 19093
    Quote Originally Posted by poser View Post
    I have literally never had a winning session there, out of at least 30 or more.
    Why in the world would you play classic BJ on a bonus? This game only counts for two percent of the WR. So in the end, your playthrough jumps to a whopping 600x!


    $100d + $100b = $200*600 = $120,000 playthrough!

    I don't think I need to go any further...you get the idea. If you only play classic BJ on a bonus, you have NO chance of ever completing the WR.
    Operators: If you don't know what Transparency means, then here you go.....now how about practicing it?

    Transparency, as used in the humanities and in a social context more generally, implies openness, communication, and accountability. It is a metaphorical extension of the meaning a "transparent" object is one that can be seen through. ...

  3. #3
    NASHVEGAS is offline Banned User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    MERS
    Posts
    2,235
    Thanks
    3,318
    Thanked 2,533 Times in 1,146 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 13325
    Quote Originally Posted by winbig View Post
    Why in the world would you play classic BJ on a bonus? This game only counts for two percent of the WR. So in the end, your playthrough jumps to a whopping 600x!


    $100d + $100b = $200*600 = $120,000 playthrough!

    I don't think I need to go any further...you get the idea. If you only play classic BJ on a bonus, you have NO chance of ever completing the WR.
    Not taking a bonus under those terms or even any terms is well intentioned advice.

    You think I am wet behind the ears now, imagine before I discovered this site.

    The partial spreadsheet I posted recently from Mansion from Sept.06 had terms where BJ counted 2% against WR towards a potential $1000 or $2000 bonus. I definitely remember that the bonus was not awarded until wagering requirements were met and for some reason I am thinking in two different installments (spreadsheet will show so I can confirm). I am not sure if you could withdraw before meeting WR's or not but I believe it was a bonus designed similar to MG's original EZ bonus concept where you could withdraw at anytime (no voiding of winnings just no bonus awarded until wagering requirments met)! FTR but moot to the point of:

    1.$750.00 deposit
    2.$62.50 balance reached within several hundred hand with a $50.00 bet in place leaving a $12.50 showing balance before bet
    3.Approx. 20000 hands later as I did not bust out reached a balance of $95,000 plus
    4.$48,000,000.00 plus (no typo) wagered

    No, I do not do this month after month but I actually have this year where in fact if I had taken a bonus on deposits of $1000 or less with BJ counting 2% towards wagering requirements, I would have easily met the wagering requirements at least 10 plus times in 7 1/2 months of play. That's fact and the good news part. And the bad news is not that I do not take bonuses with deposits.

    That said, I can not attempt to answer the OP's question because I do recollect playing Classic (I play Classic) with a bonus but I believe he deserves a response other than the first one received

  4. #4
    tombee is offline Experienced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Wageningen, Netherlands
    Posts
    134
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 70
    Only played BJ at two MG casino's but at both I had the idea that I was losing more then you would expect with the low house edge of classic BJ. However did not keep count of every session, so can't give you specific numbers, only my feelings towards it (which I already had before reading this thread).

  5. #5
    poser is offline Experienced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Hamburg
    Posts
    221
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 44 Times in 22 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Reputation Points: 255
    Why do you always want to play through a bonus if you are allowed to forfeit it ??

    But I think MG has done some sort of "correction" to bonusplay. Maybe only to players that take many bonuses. But there are too many impossible outcomes since some months.

Similar Threads

  1. Microgaming fixes their Blackjack
    By Gluten in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 26th October 2008, 11:45 PM
  2. Microgaming Blackjack
    By funky_seagull in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 26th October 2008, 12:21 PM
  3. Microgaming blackjack
    By ueber_alles in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 5th April 2004, 09:46 PM
  4. Microgaming - Blackjack
    By joestel in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 2nd January 2003, 10:49 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.