There's been so much drama and diversion in this thread I haven't been able to keep a train of thought long enough to contribute, but here's what I see today:
Prime made a mistake, admitted it, remedied it, and have changed their policy. What else is to discuss about them?
Were I a casino manager, I would not tie my own hands in regards to 'reverse chargebacks' by explicit T&C. Nothing but a weakness to exploit.
Of course in a perfect world all transactions would be audited perfectly, but it's not a perfect world. There is a level of trust in any business arrangement.
Prime probably has no special arrangement with NT, any casino can do this if Prime can. The problem is with NeTeller and as others have mentioned, that is where the players' focus should be to affect any real change in security.
The other two topics should have their own threads or be lain to rest, imo.
edit: just saw another thread... not what i meant pg, Jens should pab and it all should be laid to rest imo.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



).



You've really let the affiliate thing go to your head, KK. Bonuses are given to trap (encourage, if you prefer) people into depositing, as almost all deposits to on-line casinos are lost. "Extended playing time", "entertainment" and, as "Professor" outrageously claimed at CAP recently, "reduc[ing players'] risk for trying out a new casino" is just trying to put a gloss on a brutal business. The only "spirit" involved is greed (from the players' side as well as the casino's).
. But what an interesting thread, and it's been civil relatively speaking. Thanks for those who keep their emotions in check while trying to respond. There have been some very constructive and valuable criticism here 
Bookmarks