KING NEPTUNES Is Withholding My Winnings!

[spearmaster]

when I started playing on-line I'd meet the wr and then fiddle around with any other casino games I felt like. Naive? Perhaps, but there was never a problem.

I rest my case.

To defend the casino's actions.

Did it ever occur to you that all play must be checked in the FIRST place before the payment is approved?

Had you met the WR - your payment would have been approved - simple as that. This is a non-issue.

[derelict]

Man, if you thought this thread was bad before......

I cannot believe we're arguing over whether or not play on certain games voids winnings at Intercasino et al. This is lunacy.

[Linus]

Spear, as you can see from this screen capture, I've got bonuses stacked up at Intercasino going back to Feb. (I'm a big loser there).

If you're agreeable, we could do this right now. I deposit $500, and play one $500 game of craps. If I win, I immediately take the $1000 to Pontoon (Mmmm, Pontoon... ) and play out whatever number of hands I need to withdraw the entire amount.


Of course, I can't guarantee that I will win - in fact, it's more likely that I'll lose. But I'm 100% certain that Intercasino will not confiscate any winnings. That includes winnings on an excluded game, that has always been excluded at Intercasino, that is one of only 3 excluded games they have there, and that I know for a fact is excluded, before I begin to play.

[Vesuvio]

I rest my case.

Did it ever occur to you that all play must be checked in the FIRST place before the payment is approved?

Had you met the WR - your payment would have been approved - simple as that. This is a non-issue.

It strikes me as just as likely their accounting software flags up any significant win when disallowed games were played and they automatically void all winnings. Then only if the player complains and is persistent they'll have a closer look at the exact order the bets were played.

[Vesuvio]

Man, if you thought this thread was bad before......

I cannot believe we're arguing over whether or not play on certain games voids winnings at Intercasino et al. This is lunacy.

Can't argue with that

[soflat]

Originally Posted by spearmaster:
Why do you think she even bothered to check the actual play in the FIRST place?

Hmmm,

Originally Posted by Vesuvio:
To defend the casino's actions.

Bingo!

Obviously Micki did not want those winnings paid out. And she used her discretion to confiscate them and get a justification when the need arose.

[spearmaster]

It strikes me as just as likely their accounting software flags up any significant win when disallowed games were played and they automatically void all winnings. Then only if the player complains and is persistent they'll have a closer look at the exact order the bets were played.

I don't think their system can flag disallowed games - otherwise it would be quite simple to not allow the games to be played in the first place.

All cashouts would be checked manually if a bonus was received. And now you are really taking the mick... Everyone here at CM knows Trident's stellar reputation, and there has rarely been any complaint at all, and those rare few were immediately handled in favor of the player as well.

What on Earth (no pun intended) would even give you the impression that they act like some rogue Playtech operator?

[Vesuvio]

I don't think their system can flag disallowed games - otherwise it would be quite simple to not allow the games to be played in the first place.

You're just speculating like I am. I'm sure it would be simple to prevent players playing on disallowed games but that would remove the possibility of confiscating winning... & probably more significantly it would stop people wasting money on games that don't count to the wr. Just as making Playcheck useful would allow people to finish exactly at the wagering requirement. It's all about percentages in this game.

Anyway, I'm not suggesting King Neptune are at the level of the majority of Playtech/RTG outfits. I just think this particularly term is worthy of the latter.

Ok... that's my last word on this topic. Someone shoot me if I post again on this thread!

[spearmaster]

You're just speculating like I am. I'm sure it would be simple to prevent players playing on disallowed games but that would remove the possibility of confiscating winning... & probably more significantly it would stop people wasting money on games that don't count to the wr. Just as making Playcheck useful would allow people to finish exactly at the wagering requirement. It's all about percentages in this game.

Trust me - if they had this capability already (which they don't) we would have been howling for justice had it not been turned on. We have been asking for this for YEARS.

[maxlevine]

Ok... that's my last word on this topic. Someone shoot me if I post again on this thread!

LOL

Actually, Vesuvio, it was still interesting. But I think Simmo's cartoon many pages earlier says it all

Max