Slow Pay Won 55.000 EUR at the Casino "CASINO SECRET" and lost it due to delayed withdrawals and cancellation

But you don't belong to the gambling lobby so feel free to impress your anger about this method instead of playing the casinos` lawyer.

I am surely not playing the casino lawyer and neither angry. :rolleyes:

My posts are reflecting the experiences from the past because we have a case like yours every few weeks.

Good luck with your case, I am out!
 
You have to take the T&C's from your country. You stated that the limit is 5K . I don't have access to them

The extra withdrawal checks paragraph is part of the T&Cs of every online casino.

The limit is only linked to credit card as payment method.

And the extra withdrawal check is not mentioned in the T&C, only some general extra checks without mention of any delay of withdrawals.

CS should renew its T&C. They also state in their terms that you can play for free in live casino.....of course this is not possible.
 
... because we have a case like yours every few weeks....

One more reason to start forcing casinos to change this methods.

Everyone who had a case like mine in the past can support my litigation process in case CS will not be able to find a amicable solution. Even if I lose, this case will be very public and won't be forget so soon.
 
Online gambling businesses are required to remove unfair restrictions placed on customers withdrawing money from their gambling accounts or face action by the Gambling Commission.
This comes following the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announcing the outcome of its latest
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
.
The CMA has published enforcement action against two gambling firms, which have now committed to make changes that ensure customers are not unfairly prevented from withdrawing their money. All gambling firms are now required to adhere to the standards set out by the CMA.
 
All gambling firms are now required to adhere to the standards set out by the CMA.
In July, we announced new rules (1), which will make it quicker and easier for the Commission to take action for breaches of consumer law.

A company policy is pending 1to3 days .THE withdrawals are not even processed after 5 days is fair. If this is the rule and the judges see that I made 96 withdrawals waited for pending period which was after 3 days and still not processed after 5 days and never contracted me and I verfired. Then it my fault how? .
 
Once the withdrawal is made the terms of pending period start . It clearly said after you make a withdrawal that it will be pending for 24 to 48 hours. In terms it say pending can take up to 3 days. So after 3 days who fault is it??.
 
Some casino after pending time even cancel the withdrawals. So it returned to your account. What if I deposit and cancel my deposit which I never did and don't know how. But if someone canceland the deposit the casino would not even blink for a second and they will be chasing the money nonstop.
 
Once the withdrawal is made the terms of pending period start . It clearly said after you make a withdrawal that it will be pending for 24 to 48 hours. In terms it say pending can take up to 3 days. So after 3 days who fault is it??.

The OP is from Germany, so he falls under the MGA licence. CasinoSecret does not have a UKGC licence. :rolleyes:
 
One more reason to start forcing casinos to change this methods.

Everyone who had a case like mine in the past can support my litigation process in case CS will not be able to find a amicable solution. Even if I lose, this case will be very public and won't be forget so soon.

So you want to blame the casino for your impatience? :rolleyes:

You signed up to their T&Cs, so that is what applies. I am not defending CS, I would never sign up because there are so many better places out there and you should know that. If you need to get paid fast or want a withdrawal lock then use Videoslots, Trada, Rizk, Slots Million or the like.

Good luck with the "very public .....". Forum threats hardly ever work out but good luck.
 
Yes but pending after 3 days then he has a case.

No, why would you think otherwise?

This thread is stupid. The OP is completely to blame for reversing. I completely disagree with being able to reverse withdrawals, but while they are allowed to do this then the casino haven't done anything wrong. If the player had used a time out or self exclusion and they allowed him to play, then it would be different, but this is just a case of a player not having the self control to resist playing winnings back, something everyone has done at some point, either pre or post withdrawal.
 
It's typical the casinos want to do a gamecheck when someone wins 55k, what if someone loses 55k are they as keen and interested to run a gamecheck then?

How often do the gamechecks at 'big win withdrawal time' ever reveal a malfunction, compared to how many times it's requested and how much money is reversed and lost in that 'delay' period. By all means do a 'gamecheck' but the ethical thing would be to lock the withdrawal, or even better, not have a reverse option available in the first place. [like sky vegas]
 
One more reason to start forcing casinos to change this methods.

Everyone who had a case like mine in the past can support my litigation process in case CS will not be able to find a 1.amicable solution. Even if I lose, 2.this case will be very public and won't be forget so soon.

1. It will never happen.
2. This case would not even get into court, and would have zero publicity.

You need to let it go and stop blaming the casino for something you did.
Yes the t&c may suck, but bottom line is that you was to impatient to wait a few days for this extra check to take place.

Even if there was a chance this could get into court, a thread like this with you making threats about "how public" it will be and how bad it will look for CS would not work in your favor.

You need to let it go.
 
Why wont the UKGC do the one thing that could prevent all this shit, ban reversals, no one want them apart from the casinos
that have and continue to make a fortune out them , instead we get all the hassle of intrusive checks and stupid rules
on autoplays,someone must have a massive influence on their policies for reversals to be allowed to continue
 
When I sent someone some money using back it said 1to3days. After 3 days the person didn't receive the money I rang the bank on fourth day and they said it was a glitch and gave me 25 for incovience . This is because they obey UK law. If the casino wanted they could just add a terms saying we can steal your money and people would say it fair OK? ?. Or bad terms but they are not held responsible
 
When I sent someone some money using back it said 1to3days. After 3 days the person didn't receive the money I rang the bank on fourth day and they said it was a glitch and gave me 25 for incovience . This is because they obey UK law. If the casino wanted they could just add a terms saying we can steal your money and people would say it fair OK? ?. Or bad terms but they are not held responsible

Which law is this?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top