Hi,
I don't know if you can help me, I am writing this as I am desperate and don't know where else to go with it.
In June of this year I joined William Hill Casino online.At the time I had just moved and in retrospect should never have joined the casino, I was suffering from anxiety and depression which had been long running and had been signed off by the doctor for 2 years as ill and unfit for work.
After being with William Hill for 3 and a half weeks I received a bank statement that showed that just over 45,000 pounds had gone from my account to William Hill. This was a complete shock to say the least, especially as the casino stated on their FAQ's page that they set deposit limits of 1,000 per week. I was in such a state my partner took over and wrote the following to the casino:
**************************************************
RE: ACCOUNT :
User Name: *********
William Hill Account Number: CP0********
I am writing on behalf of my partner who joined your casino approx. 5 weeks ago. She opened an account with her switch card and started to play your online games. She had read different terms and conditions and had read on your
I have tried to download her statements online from the casino, but it only shows a couple of dates, and in all honesty the figures seem to be all over the place, I cannot make head nor tail of them.
I would like to know how this can happen when you do clearly state on that page that limits are imposed. I would also like to know if there is anything that could be done given this situation, to get if not all , some of her money back. I am taking her to see a solicitor, but obviously wanted to contact you in the first instance for your comments.
A prompt reply would be appreciated as I am very concerned about this and in turn how its affecting her mental state.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards
L.Bayliss
**************************************************
That e mail was sent on the 8th of August 2003. There was no reply to that mail until the 18th August 2003 and then it was only an acknowledgment mail and was as follows :
**************************************************
Dear Mr. Bayliss,
Your query was forwarded to our Casino Director and the Manager of Ecashdirect
Customer Care last week.
They are in discussion with our Legal Team and should be in touch with you in the next few days.
With regards,
Robert Sadler
Internet Customer Services Manager
William Hill E-Commerce
**************************************************
In those 10 days that went by, my partner phoned William Hill, and wrote many more e mails asking for a reply. Writing to them can be a problem as some of the e mail addresses that they list on their site do not work. On the 26th of August Mr. Sadler did reply with the following:
**************************************************
Dear Mr. Bayliss,
Thank you for your e-mail.
I have been in lengthy discussions regarding this situation with my colleagues both at William Hill and Ecash and I will be in touch when they have concluded.
I will e-mail you on Thursday when I return to the office.
With regards,
Robert Sadler
**************************************************
On the 29th of August he wrote the following:
**************************************************
Dear Mr. Bayliss,
As stated before, I have been in lengthy discussions with my
colleagues regarding this situation.
Having examined the circumstances I regret that we will not
be returning the stakes as you have requested. All transactions
were accepted in good faith and as far as we are concerned are
legitimate. Had your partner won we would have honored the bets.
Although the FAQ's on the Casino splashpage
were inadvertently displaying the previous depositing details, all
other parts of the site displayed the updated correct version.
The revised deposit limits were displayed correctly within the actual
Casino application where all transactions take place. These limits are
guidelines with the option for individual customers to set their own
limits
As you have previously noted, you are no longer able to access your
partner's account. It is our policy to close the accounts of problem
gamblers as soon as we detect (or are informed) that there is a
problem; this is why you have no further access to the account.
Our sites are designed as enjoyable, easy and affordable entertainment
and are treated as such by the vast majority of customers. We recommend
that you seek help from the following Organisation:
In your previous correspondence you stated that there was a discrepancy
in the account statement. If you send me proof of this I will arrange
for the 60 to be reimbursed.
With regards,
Robert Sadler
Internet Customer Services Manager
William Hill E-Commerce
**************************************************
Since then many more e mails have gone backwards and forwards. My partner requested all of the transaction statements and game logs, for which we had to wait along time for, but they were sent eventually.The game logs and transaction statements have discrepancies and although Mr Sadler was told of this, nothing has been explained. Mr Sadler was asked who made the decision to not refund any money, how the decision was reached, why the page displaying the limits as incorrect, why on their code of ethics page they state that they are committed to detecting and stopping compulsive gambling and also why it states on their site that they only print true and accurate information, when they clearly do not.I also found a guy who is involved in the online casino industry who wanted to mediate for me as he felt that the whole situation was being dealt with so badly, this was the reply that eventually followed:
**************************************************
Dear ***********
Thank you for your e-mail.
As the Internet Customer Services Manager for William Hill I am empowered
to make decisions on behalf of the Company I represent.
The decision I made in this instance was made after extensive discussions
with my colleagues within the Company. The content of those discussions
is entirely confidential.
The decision not to return your stakes has now been made and there is no
reason for further discussion. I will not be negotiating with Mr Ma**** on a matter
which has already been resolved.
I am still awaiting the outcome of investigations by Ecash into your allegations of
an account discrepancy, I will be in touch in due course.
With regards,
Robert Sadler
Internet Customer Services Manager
William Hill E-Commerce
Apart from the fact that I am climbing the walls over this and am flat broke, and I mean flat broke, I do not want this happening to other people.I find it amazing that no one has even phoned me to discuss this, no one asked me for proof that I was ill or on medication and that I still am. I went to a solicitor who said that they would take the case but it would be hard as the casino side of William hill is based off shore and therefore falls under a different law to the UK. The page that displayed the limits got changed before they acknowledged my first e mail, but I have a print out of the page as it was, and of course it is dated.When you play online you are in a false world, I won't be doing it again, but I am sure there are people out there that will. They state that they are committed to stopping and detecting compulsive gambling but since changing the limit page, their new limits are set at 10,000 per day and 50,000 per week. If that's not out of control I don't know what is! It's very hard to write about this in its entirety.I have all correspondence sent and received from them and there is much more I could tell you, but this e mail is a outline as to what happened.My solicitor actually suggested the papers as he felt William Hill would not want adverse publicity.I have warned them that I would write to the tabloids and they just are not bothered by it, it seems. Can you help me?
My contact home number if you wanted to talk to me is ************.
Regards
****************
(Message edited by casinomeister on September 26, 2003)
I don't know if you can help me, I am writing this as I am desperate and don't know where else to go with it.
In June of this year I joined William Hill Casino online.At the time I had just moved and in retrospect should never have joined the casino, I was suffering from anxiety and depression which had been long running and had been signed off by the doctor for 2 years as ill and unfit for work.
After being with William Hill for 3 and a half weeks I received a bank statement that showed that just over 45,000 pounds had gone from my account to William Hill. This was a complete shock to say the least, especially as the casino stated on their FAQ's page that they set deposit limits of 1,000 per week. I was in such a state my partner took over and wrote the following to the casino:
**************************************************
RE: ACCOUNT :
User Name: *********
William Hill Account Number: CP0********
I am writing on behalf of my partner who joined your casino approx. 5 weeks ago. She opened an account with her switch card and started to play your online games. She had read different terms and conditions and had read on your
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
that you have deposit limits of 1,000 gbp per week. In 3 and a half weeks approx. 45,000 gbp has gone from her bank account to William hill.She has not cashed out a penny. If I had known she was doing this I would have stopped her. She is currently under the doctor and has been for the past 2 years suffering from depression and anxiety.She seemed to be getting slightly better, now she is suicidal.She had just sold her flat and that money was all she had in the world.I have tried to download her statements online from the casino, but it only shows a couple of dates, and in all honesty the figures seem to be all over the place, I cannot make head nor tail of them.
I would like to know how this can happen when you do clearly state on that page that limits are imposed. I would also like to know if there is anything that could be done given this situation, to get if not all , some of her money back. I am taking her to see a solicitor, but obviously wanted to contact you in the first instance for your comments.
A prompt reply would be appreciated as I am very concerned about this and in turn how its affecting her mental state.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards
L.Bayliss
**************************************************
That e mail was sent on the 8th of August 2003. There was no reply to that mail until the 18th August 2003 and then it was only an acknowledgment mail and was as follows :
**************************************************
Dear Mr. Bayliss,
Your query was forwarded to our Casino Director and the Manager of Ecashdirect
Customer Care last week.
They are in discussion with our Legal Team and should be in touch with you in the next few days.
With regards,
Robert Sadler
Internet Customer Services Manager
William Hill E-Commerce
**************************************************
In those 10 days that went by, my partner phoned William Hill, and wrote many more e mails asking for a reply. Writing to them can be a problem as some of the e mail addresses that they list on their site do not work. On the 26th of August Mr. Sadler did reply with the following:
**************************************************
Dear Mr. Bayliss,
Thank you for your e-mail.
I have been in lengthy discussions regarding this situation with my colleagues both at William Hill and Ecash and I will be in touch when they have concluded.
I will e-mail you on Thursday when I return to the office.
With regards,
Robert Sadler
**************************************************
On the 29th of August he wrote the following:
**************************************************
Dear Mr. Bayliss,
As stated before, I have been in lengthy discussions with my
colleagues regarding this situation.
Having examined the circumstances I regret that we will not
be returning the stakes as you have requested. All transactions
were accepted in good faith and as far as we are concerned are
legitimate. Had your partner won we would have honored the bets.
Although the FAQ's on the Casino splashpage
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
were inadvertently displaying the previous depositing details, all
other parts of the site displayed the updated correct version.
The revised deposit limits were displayed correctly within the actual
Casino application where all transactions take place. These limits are
guidelines with the option for individual customers to set their own
limits
As you have previously noted, you are no longer able to access your
partner's account. It is our policy to close the accounts of problem
gamblers as soon as we detect (or are informed) that there is a
problem; this is why you have no further access to the account.
Our sites are designed as enjoyable, easy and affordable entertainment
and are treated as such by the vast majority of customers. We recommend
that you seek help from the following Organisation:
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
In your previous correspondence you stated that there was a discrepancy
in the account statement. If you send me proof of this I will arrange
for the 60 to be reimbursed.
With regards,
Robert Sadler
Internet Customer Services Manager
William Hill E-Commerce
**************************************************
Since then many more e mails have gone backwards and forwards. My partner requested all of the transaction statements and game logs, for which we had to wait along time for, but they were sent eventually.The game logs and transaction statements have discrepancies and although Mr Sadler was told of this, nothing has been explained. Mr Sadler was asked who made the decision to not refund any money, how the decision was reached, why the page displaying the limits as incorrect, why on their code of ethics page they state that they are committed to detecting and stopping compulsive gambling and also why it states on their site that they only print true and accurate information, when they clearly do not.I also found a guy who is involved in the online casino industry who wanted to mediate for me as he felt that the whole situation was being dealt with so badly, this was the reply that eventually followed:
**************************************************
Dear ***********
Thank you for your e-mail.
As the Internet Customer Services Manager for William Hill I am empowered
to make decisions on behalf of the Company I represent.
The decision I made in this instance was made after extensive discussions
with my colleagues within the Company. The content of those discussions
is entirely confidential.
The decision not to return your stakes has now been made and there is no
reason for further discussion. I will not be negotiating with Mr Ma**** on a matter
which has already been resolved.
I am still awaiting the outcome of investigations by Ecash into your allegations of
an account discrepancy, I will be in touch in due course.
With regards,
Robert Sadler
Internet Customer Services Manager
William Hill E-Commerce
Apart from the fact that I am climbing the walls over this and am flat broke, and I mean flat broke, I do not want this happening to other people.I find it amazing that no one has even phoned me to discuss this, no one asked me for proof that I was ill or on medication and that I still am. I went to a solicitor who said that they would take the case but it would be hard as the casino side of William hill is based off shore and therefore falls under a different law to the UK. The page that displayed the limits got changed before they acknowledged my first e mail, but I have a print out of the page as it was, and of course it is dated.When you play online you are in a false world, I won't be doing it again, but I am sure there are people out there that will. They state that they are committed to stopping and detecting compulsive gambling but since changing the limit page, their new limits are set at 10,000 per day and 50,000 per week. If that's not out of control I don't know what is! It's very hard to write about this in its entirety.I have all correspondence sent and received from them and there is much more I could tell you, but this e mail is a outline as to what happened.My solicitor actually suggested the papers as he felt William Hill would not want adverse publicity.I have warned them that I would write to the tabloids and they just are not bothered by it, it seems. Can you help me?
My contact home number if you wanted to talk to me is ************.
Regards
****************
(Message edited by casinomeister on September 26, 2003)