Why roulette can't be beat using statistics

[Guntis]

I only watched similar roulette videos in the 2000s when i didn't have a clue what was going on. Most of them turned out to be scammers since their systems promised or even guaranteed wins.

But i remember one UK guy who posted sneaky videos of himself winning at Grosvenor's tables, and lots of people were interested in his playing method. He was selling a small book or PDF with guidance, but it was too expensive for me.

Later, i found a breakdown of his system in another language. The method looked overcomplicated just to impress buyers. But essentially worked similarly to what i wrote in other thread.

Regarding roulette predictors like Joe croupier's sales - these days it isn't rocket science and almost anyone can create a similar thing in about 10 minutes with any logic they want behind it. And then put it online for free. I just made one already. Wanna buy? £5 and it's yours for free .

 

[RouletteTools]

I only watched similar roulette videos in the 2000s when i didn't have a clue what was going on. Most of them turned out to be scammers since their systems promised or even guaranteed wins.

But i remember one UK guy who posted sneaky videos of himself winning at Grosvenor's tables, and lots of people were interested in his playing method. He was selling a small book or PDF with guidance, but it was too expensive for me.

Later, i found a breakdown of his system in another language. The method looked overcomplicated just to impress buyers. But essentially worked similarly to what i wrote in other thread.

Regarding roulette predictors like Joe croupier's sales - these days it isn't rocket science and almost anyone can create a similar thing in about 10 minutes with any logic they want behind it. And then put it online for free. I just made one already. Wanna buy? £5 and it's yours for free .

View attachment 204009

chatgpt is great for this stuff, Sanrta has lots of them

 

[Guntis]

ChatGPT is useless, cheeky c**t, it acts as your best friend but always lies, lol. This one is v0.dev

 

[syntynyt]

Immersive Roulette has been modified in the past few months to become magnetic like all Evolution variants. How in the world is such mammoth company allowed to run a live roulette version where the ball is sucked into the number by force to satisfy the number premeditation. It was the only variant where the ball actually bounced for the show and they showed the slow mo effect. There has to be a small print written somewhere stating that the numbers are predetermined and the live factor is because is held by a dealer?

 

[viewsource]

I was reading about them in 2004, which was when i started playing roulette. I was in my early 20s when i discovered a system called Martingale.... I thought only a few people knew about it and believed i had found the holy grail. But missed out a fact that roulette had been played for centuries before i was born.

For three nights in a row, i won 1K a night, and i was so happy thinking that all i need is just £100-200 a day and i can leave my work. Then on the forth day i lost it all.

The gadget that those guys at the Ritz used likely worked like the one in this video. One person stood next to the wheel with a device attached to them, capturing sound and then passing info via Bluetooth to a bettors earpiece.

I was quite into these computers at some point, but then discovered that there were scams going on. And some people reckoned that all those roulette forums were owned by Playtech, and i just left this alone.



This video is about 15 years old, and you would rarely find such wheels at casino with heavy balls nowadays. They work well if you know how to use visual ballistics and perfectly familiar with call bets.

There was a recent-ish science paper where they proved out an algorithm for roulette prediction using telemetry captured once the ball was launched. I think they got the RTP upto around 140% ish.

But. And it's a very big but. You need a level of access and view of the table which isn't practical in a bricks and mortar casino. Online is a slightly different story and probably explains why the likes of evolution use RNG.

 

[mulven]

There was a recent-ish science paper where they proved out an algorithm for roulette prediction using telemetry captured once the ball was launched. I think they got the RTP upto around 140% ish.

But. And it's a very big but. You need a level of access and view of the table which isn't practical in a bricks and mortar casino. Online is a slightly different story and probably explains why the likes of evolution use RNG.

It's satisfying that the RTP they managed to get in the paper roughly lines up with the RTP the university team in the 80s managed.

 

[SlamRoyale]

Based on the logic that the probability of the same half falling out more than four times in a row decreases, I made the bets, everything was fine and the strategy worked until one half fell out 10 times in a row, which cancelled my balance.

On a 50/50 chance per spin, simple maths says you should encounter 10 in a row once in just 1024 spins. That's so common!

And since your strategy waited for 3 in a row, you actually only had martingale for 7 in a row, that's just 1 in 128. It's no surprise you lost quickly

And that's on a perfect 50% chance. So it doesn't count the 0, which takes down your chances even lower.

I just calculated: 7 in a row loss = 0.0094 = almost 1 in 100.
10 in a row loss = 0.00127 = over 1 in 1000.

 

[dunover]

Has anyone heard of Santa Claus on youtube ? he's got a different way to look at roulette, some people call him a scammer but there's no evidence of this.

He's actually a genius to most

Please don't shill channels here - read the forum rules!

 

[RouletteTools]

Please don't shill channels here - read the forum rules!

huh ?