Why do some casinos give many bonusses...

yoshirules

Experienced Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Location
holland
and if you use them, according to them too much, you get bonusbanned.
It has happened to me.
When I keep losing I can use as many bonusses as I want.
But if you win sometimes you get bonusbanned.
Whats the point of giving so many deposit bonusses, if you are not allowed to use them all?
 

vinylweatherman

You type well loads
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Location
United Kingdom
and if you use them, according to them too much, you get bonusbanned.
It has happened to me.
When I keep losing I can use as many bonusses as I want.
But if you win sometimes you get bonusbanned.
Whats the point of giving so many deposit bonusses, if you are not allowed to use them all?
Another Rival player eh:rolleyes:

Seriously, I have found quite a few casinos where the bonus offers mysteriously, and often suddenly, dry up when you win. I have found a few others where they knock you down a level after the first surge ahead, and kill the bonuses althogether the next time you win.

There are some that will even bonus ban overall LOSERS, greed perhaps, losing, but not fast enough for their liking.

In most cases though, the more you are down, the better the bonuses. This reverse logic means that players are inticed to play MORE where they are LOSING, than where they have merely BEEN LUCKY enough to win (assuming the bonuses have been properly designed to give a long term edge to the house). Casinos that bonus ban players simply for BEING LUCKY lose the chance to get it back over the long term, which mathematics proves they surely will (all things being the same).

Many operators don't understand these concepts, and are too quick to assume "bonus abuse" MUST be playing a part in the gameplay of a player that wins, even though in many cases it is purely down to luck. The luck argument is no more clearly demonstrated with SLOTS, where a player can come out ahead overall one ONE rare lucky hit, which has NOTHING to do with bonuses (other than perhaps making the resultant net win LESS because there would still be WR to complete).

Where players play "advantage" games such as Blackjack, the logic of the casino is easier to understand. BJ has a low edge, and low variance, so a player using small bets, or big bets followed by small bets, has a very good chance of beating the casino. Getting ahead only shows the casino that the player is clever enough to operate the relevant strategy, so they get bonus banned. They would be unlikely to win the money back from the player by continuing to offer the bonuses.

Many bonus now exclude obvious advantage games like Blackjack, and quite a few are slots only.
 

yoshirules

Experienced Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Location
holland
a rival indeed but i'm also talking about a RTG an accredited one.
won 3 times in a row, so now I'm bonusbanned
 

NicolasJohnson

Dormant account
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Location
A Place
Another Rival player eh:rolleyes:

Seriously, I have found quite a few casinos where the bonus offers mysteriously, and often suddenly, dry up when you win. I have found a few others where they knock you down a level after the first surge ahead, and kill the bonuses althogether the next time you win.

There are some that will even bonus ban overall LOSERS, greed perhaps, losing, but not fast enough for their liking.

In most cases though, the more you are down, the better the bonuses. This reverse logic means that players are inticed to play MORE where they are LOSING, than where they have merely BEEN LUCKY enough to win (assuming the bonuses have been properly designed to give a long term edge to the house). Casinos that bonus ban players simply for BEING LUCKY lose the chance to get it back over the long term, which mathematics proves they surely will (all things being the same).

Many operators don't understand these concepts, and are too quick to assume "bonus abuse" MUST be playing a part in the gameplay of a player that wins, even though in many cases it is purely down to luck. The luck argument is no more clearly demonstrated with SLOTS, where a player can come out ahead overall one ONE rare lucky hit, which has NOTHING to do with bonuses (other than perhaps making the resultant net win LESS because there would still be WR to complete).

Where players play "advantage" games such as Blackjack, the logic of the casino is easier to understand. BJ has a low edge, and low variance, so a player using small bets, or big bets followed by small bets, has a very good chance of beating the casino. Getting ahead only shows the casino that the player is clever enough to operate the relevant strategy, so they get bonus banned. They would be unlikely to win the money back from the player by continuing to offer the bonuses.

Many bonus now exclude obvious advantage games like Blackjack, and quite a few are slots only.

I just wanted to pop by and say that we believe excluding games is too drastic.

While I can understand the logic to it, in past places I have worked I've witnessed endless confusion and abuse* when it comes to excluded games. That is why we don't exclude any games, we just add a multiplier to the wagering requirement amount on games like blackjack.

That way players can enjoy playing their favorite games, and we can continue giving big bonuses.


* We are concerned the abuse doesn't even necessarily have to be a corporate policy, it can be even a rogue employee trying to make bonus goals or whatever.

Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
Regal Affiliates Manager
 

RobWin

closed account
Joined
Apr 24, 2004
Location
A Vault!
I just wanted to pop by and say that we believe excluding games is too drastic.

While I can understand the logic to it, in past places I have worked I've witnessed endless confusion and abuse* when it comes to excluded games. That is why we don't exclude any games, we just add a multiplier to the wagering requirement amount on games like blackjack.

That way players can enjoy playing their favorite games, and we can continue giving big bonuses.


* We are concerned the abuse doesn't even necessarily have to be a corporate policy, it can be even a rogue employee trying to make bonus goals or whatever.

Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
Regal Affiliates Manager
Nicolas, please look at my account there "RobWin", and you will see the same thing that I see. I currently have 11 bonus coupons available to me there in the cashier client. Those 11 coupons range from a "10% Alternative Deposit Bonus" to a "400% Bonus".

9 of those coupons do not allow me to play my favorite game which is video poker and the only two that do allow it are for only 10% and 50% respectively.

I would like for you guys to customize some video poker bonuses for me with no max cashout, not the typical slots type where I can only cash out 3x or 4x or 5x. I never use those anyway. If you could make this happen for me there then I would be an everyday depositor there instead of a sporadic depositor...:cool:
____
____
 

NicolasJohnson

Dormant account
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Location
A Place
your wish is our command

Nicolas, please look at my account there "RobWin", and you will see the same thing that I see. I currently have 11 bonus coupons available to me there in the cashier client. Those 11 coupons range from a "10% Alternative Deposit Bonus" to a "400% Bonus".

9 of those coupons do not allow me to play my favorite game which is video poker and the only two that do allow it are for only 10% and 50% respectively.

I would like for you guys to customize some video poker bonuses for me with no max cashout, not the typical slots type where I can only cash out 3x or 4x or 5x. I never use those anyway. If you could make this happen for me there then I would be an everyday depositor there instead of a sporadic depositor...:cool:
____
____

You have spoken and we have listened. We will allow VP for all bonuses, :thumbsup: albeit with a multiplier.

The change isn't instant but should be out in our next update. :notworthy

I will make a note that we don't allow bonus play on Progressives due to the issues that arise with that. :oops:

About the no max cashout, I'll talk to the promotions people and see what we can do.

Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
Regal Affiliates Manager
 

nisosbar

Ueber Meister
PABnonaccred
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Location
Right here
Bonuses are a means of attracting players.

But if you are lucky, I don't think it makes sense to take a bonus, since there are max cashouts, and games are restricted - as someone else has said, you can't play video poker on most Rivals if you took a bonus - EVEN AFTER you have cleared the bonus! WTF?

Also, the wagering requirements - you can win big but then lose it all back meeting the bonus wagering requirement.

I'm about done with bonuses, myself.
 

vinylweatherman

You type well loads
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Location
United Kingdom
You have spoken and we have listened. We will allow VP for all bonuses, :thumbsup: albeit with a multiplier.

The change isn't instant but should be out in our next update. :notworthy

I will make a note that we don't allow bonus play on Progressives due to the issues that arise with that. :oops:

About the no max cashout, I'll talk to the promotions people and see what we can do.

Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
Regal Affiliates Manager
It would be better if such rules were ENFORCED at the SOFTWARE level. This means that a player could never mistakenly, or cleverly, use ANY gameplay that is excluded for the particular bonus they took. Excluded games should simply not load, but give an error "this game is not permitted with your current bonus". Where placing large bets on an allowed game is the problem, such as entire balance on a single hand of Blackjack, the software should modify the max bet to an acceptable "non abusive" level.

Progressive play is an odd issue, the concept is the same throughout, yet some casinos allow play on progressives with a bonus, and some don't. The definition of progressive is not always clear either. The RTG Reel Series slots are "progressive" slots, they have a random jackpot element, which operates exactly like a network progressive by taking a contribution from each bet to give a chance of winning it, or adding it to the pool for others to win.

Players CANNOT "abuse" bonuses by playing progressives, since they CANNOT control who wins it, and it is highly unlikely to be THEM.

The CASINO can only have a problem if too many players as a whole play too much on progressives whilst using large percentage bonuses. I doubt individual "advantage players" would see progressives as a way forward, they would prefer games where they get ALL of the RTP allocated to the base game, which as a result would have a higher net RTP because no contributions are being lost to a pool.
 

NicolasJohnson

Dormant account
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Location
A Place
It would be better if such rules were ENFORCED at the SOFTWARE level. This means that a player could never mistakenly, or cleverly, use ANY gameplay that is excluded for the particular bonus they took. Excluded games should simply not load, but give an error "this game is not permitted with your current bonus". Where placing large bets on an allowed game is the problem, such as entire balance on a single hand of Blackjack, the software should modify the max bet to an acceptable "non abusive" level.

Progressive play is an odd issue, the concept is the same throughout, yet some casinos allow play on progressives with a bonus, and some don't. The definition of progressive is not always clear either. The RTG Reel Series slots are "progressive" slots, they have a random jackpot element, which operates exactly like a network progressive by taking a contribution from each bet to give a chance of winning it, or adding it to the pool for others to win.

Players CANNOT "abuse" bonuses by playing progressives, since they CANNOT control who wins it, and it is highly unlikely to be THEM.

The CASINO can only have a problem if too many players as a whole play too much on progressives whilst using large percentage bonuses. I doubt individual "advantage players" would see progressives as a way forward, they would prefer games where they get ALL of the RTP allocated to the base game, which as a result would have a higher net RTP because no contributions are being lost to a pool.

You are absolutely right about the software level.

About the reason we dis-allow progressive play with bonuses, it isn't because of bonus abuse, but rather because of the amount of bonuses we give and the implications that would have in the amount we would have to contribute to the jackpot.

Because we give so many and so large bonuses, if players played progressives, we would pay $100,000s of dollars worth of progressive contributions on money we never got. This would cut into our already very small profit margin. If we allowed Progressive play with bonuses, we would have to cut down on how much we give. We've made the decision that we believe most of our players would rather have a large bonus, than be able to play it on a progressive. I know not all players will feel that way, but it was a decision we had to make :notworthy

Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
Regal Affiliates Manager
 

Mavin1

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Location
Arizona
My feelings about bonuses is I only use them to try out a new casino, have only taken a deposit bonus on rare occasion and like it has been said in this thread you usually lose your win trying to fulling the requirements.
Casinos have their rules, this is mine,
"I reserve the right to not play at any casino that I have used a bonus at to try them out and find the play not to my liking, which covers a multitude of reasons. I would furthermore mutually ban a casino from my computer if they decided I was abusing something they willingly give freely".
It's like if I make green chili burros and my friends want one, I would give them some and not take it back :p. If they don't like my burros, they will not ask for them again. This rarely happens as they ask if I made more yet :rolleyes:, mmm, not telling.
 

felicie

Dormant account
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Location
somewhere else
Exactly Mavin1 and I've got a question about bonus': that little thing it says in terms 'any balance over the max cashout amount left in your account will be removed after a cashout', or something like that. what if you do not cash out anything and have somehow gotten the balance up to a grand. (used to happen lol) What happens if you come back later and deposit a $100? Then you get that up another grand and want to cashout. Will they remove the lst grand from the bonus then, even though you deposited $100?
Thank you. ;)
 

Mavin1

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Location
Arizona
I am wondering the same too, never paid attention to it before until I saw the thread Lookaway has started. The rules are absurd and I will be looking at them more closely from now on. :mad:
 

yoshirules

Experienced Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Location
holland
I like bonusses cause they give you more playtime and its for me a reason to withdraw as soon as I met the wagering Req.
But my question was like at Rivals but also at RTGs (happend this week to me at an accredited one) as soon as you WIN a few times you are not allowed to use any of the bonusses. Even though they sent you emails about their weekly (sometimes daily) bonusses

You can use them all if you are losing, but as soon as you win in their eyes too many times you get bonusbanned.

I think its a strange policy

Either you give players a bonus every time no matter if they win or lose

Or you dont give them a bonus at all, only at first deposit like at most microgaming casinos
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top