1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Who wants 96 teams for March Madness?

Discussion in 'Sports Talk' started by coloradobuff, Feb 25, 2010.

    Feb 25, 2010
  1. coloradobuff

    coloradobuff Experienced Member

    Sports Writer
    Denver, Colorado
    I am totally against this. I dont think we need to change from the 64/65 teams we have now.

  2. Feb 26, 2010
  3. Jasminebed

    Jasminebed Closer to 100 than Birth

    Not in workforce
    I'll preface my remarks by that I no longer watch college basketball intently. I have some appreciation for the sport, and do participate in various pools in my local pubs.

    It just seems wrong to me. I don't even start watching until the Road to the Sweet Sixteen, and not until Final Four do I make a point of catching the games.

    I don't know how that will work in a mathematical progression, but it just seems like messing with something that is not broken.

    Perhaps by enhancing the number of teams, they increase the viewer base of home team rooters. After all, it is ratings and commercials that really drive professional sports, not the sportsbooks.

Share This Page