1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

When is a 'bug' not a bug?

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by JuicyFruit, Dec 9, 2012.

    Dec 9, 2012
  1. JuicyFruit

    JuicyFruit Non-Gambler

    Occupation:
    IT Consultant
    Location:
    Homeward Bound
    I posted this in another thread, and after having received a response, I am curious to know what others think. It relates to Rival's "Wild Carnival" slot.

    The response....
    My view is that this is very poor programming indeed. If the bet size has not changed, the system should be able to detect this, and the warning should not appear, thus allowing continued use of the 'max bet' button. What it should not be doing is "assuming" a change has been made....it should be checking first.

    Also, I often constantly use the Bet Max, or alternate it with the SPIN, if I am playing max bet. I have never encountered this before. Was anyone else aware the 'max bet' had limitations of use?
     
  2. Dec 9, 2012
  3. ChopleyIOM

    ChopleyIOM Hearthstone Addict webby

    Occupation:
    Kobold Geomancer
    Location:
    UK
    It's about par for the course for Rival TBH, you just have to get used to the little, ahem, 'quirks' of the software :)

    I see they have at least fixed the help file for Wild Carnival, when the game went live it said the expected payback was 'about 76' :D
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Dec 9, 2012
  5. JuicyFruit

    JuicyFruit Non-Gambler

    Occupation:
    IT Consultant
    Location:
    Homeward Bound

    Oh dear!!!
     
  6. Dec 10, 2012
  7. ChopleyIOM

    ChopleyIOM Hearthstone Addict webby

    Occupation:
    Kobold Geomancer
    Location:
    UK
    I don't think it's a deal-breaker TBH, Rival do have a good number of unique and really fun slots on their books, and The Back Nine remains a masterpiece IMO, even though they properly fucked with it when the pays went from 'about 99' to 'about 95'.

    But yeah, you just have to get used to stuff not quite working properly and/or them saying they'll change things when they don't.

    The autoplay options (or lack thereof) have been on the 'Yes we'll fix that' list for years now.

    I thought I was the first to flag them up but then KasinoKing linked to a thread from years ago bringing up the exact same things :D
     

Share This Page