1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice

Poll:Best Screenshot of the Month?



Candidates Revealed...Cast your vote!.
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

What happens to MG VP?

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by oyw7862, Feb 15, 2008.

    Feb 15, 2008
  1. oyw7862

    oyw7862 Quit Gambling

    Occupation:
    engineer
    Location:
    AU
    Recently, I played alot of VP(Jack better) @10 per hand.
    Something strange caught my eye.

    For example:
    Today, In 400 hands, I was given 4 to a RF 9 times.:eek:
    Needless to say, none of them hit.

    Similar VP sessions happened several times recently.

    Is it anoter trick of MG like more and more near missing features in slots?:mad:

    As I am not a hardcore VP player, I just reminder those who play are.

    Watch out, as if you got alot of 4 to a RF, you likely blow your bank roll very quick.:notworthy
     
  2. Feb 15, 2008
  3. Mousey

    Mousey Ueber Meister Mouse CAG

    Occupation:
    Pencil Pusher
    Location:
    Up$hitCreek
    Don't know that that's unusual. I ran into it during my last B&M trip. I saw 4 to the RF (no hits) so many times I nearly lost my cool.
     
  4. Feb 15, 2008
  5. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Being dealt 4 to a RF is far more likely than being dealt all 5, however, seeing this 9 times in only 400 hands does seem odd, more odd in fact, than the fact that none hit.

    To hit the RF from 4 dealt, you have a chance of 1 in 48 perhand. 9 such deals in 10-UP would give you 90 chances, and although you should have got nearly two hits on average, getting none is not that unlikely.
    Although mainly on 4-UP VP, I had a very long spell of never hitting the RF from a dealt 4 to RF. I believe more RFs come from 3 to RF because this is dealt far more often than 4 to RF.
     
  6. Feb 16, 2008
  7. brianzz

    brianzz Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Work
    Location:
    TN
  8. Feb 16, 2008
  9. juliack

    juliack Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Canada
    Hi oyw7862. I brought this up a few weeks ago. I have never seen so many 4 to a royal as I have in the past 3 months. I think I have seen more 4 to a royal in the past few months than I have seen in almost 8 years online. Something is very strange. Cheers
     
  10. Feb 16, 2008
  11. pacers31

    pacers31 Banned Used - Repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Occupation:
    Marketing Rep
    Location:
    Californication
    I noticed that too you guys, but I have also hit three RFs in the last month, so I don't really know what the deal is. Unfortunately I hit them when my balance was almost nil, and I had reduced the bet.
     
  12. Feb 16, 2008
  13. hippo925

    hippo925 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    medical field
    Location:
    so cal
    i don't play video poker that much at all but i did find the recent posts interesting because if ANYONE would notice interesting things in regards to VP, i KNOW who it would be. Juliack has to have a profound knowledge of the game because of the amount of play. I mean, i know who i would PM if i had a question about VP!:D
     

Share This Page