What casinos have the best payouts UK?

bamberfishcake

Meister Member
PABaccred
MM
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Location
Essex
I keep a list of the RTP of the UK casinos that i play at and will be sharing this each month.

Remember, the lower the % the lower the game is fixed to give back or pay!

The stats are checked within a week of publishing and this is by no means a comprehensive list so it must be said -

'Check the RTP before playing, anywhere!'.

Screenshot 2020-01-29 at 08.10.48.png

The 3 on my list to watch if you wish to avoid the lower paying versions are Videoslots, Trada and Grosvenor. I hear Coral also have lower RTP on some providers.

This month has seen Cashmio and Dunder also lower RTP although I have found only one game on each site, amongst what i have checked.

I will put this in a friendlier format when i have a minute and invite you all to contribute as it will help us out.

Knowledge is power, know what your playing!
 
Hi @bamberfishcake, I can let you know the RTP of the games we do offer on our website (they're also listed in the information box on each of the games marked with the i on the bottom right when hovering over the slot).

For the games that we do offer -

Book of Dead - 96.21%
The Sword & The Grail - 96.53%
Rise Of Olympus - 96.50%
Gemix - 96.83%
Reactoonz - 96.51%
Wolf Gold - 96.20%
John Hunter & Scarab Queen - 96.5% (This one isn't visible in the information screen for some reason so I've asked our content team to update it + our casino team to confirm the RTP).
Vampires Vs Wolves - 96.20%
Madame Destiny - 96.20%
Dog House - 96.20%

Let me know if you need any more info and I can see what our Casino Team can provide!
 
@L&L-Jan are you using lower RTP settings?

IGT offers and I always go for the middle, 92 - 94 or 96 - we do them on 94. Book of Ra classic is on 92.82 or something like that? That's it the rest is all providers standards.

I believe for an online casino with tax obligations a RTP between 94 and 96 is fair. Some games towards 97% - depending on the volatily - I might not release.

e.g. the new secret of the stones - max was boderline for me, but the game is popular and the regular version goes EOL, so had to. RTP is 96.81% for the Max version.

Speaking of games, I'll shall update our releases for February in a seperate topic.
 
This is a nice honest reply From l&l.
The sites with lower RTP are certainly not to be Avoided. TheYou might get a Lower RTP for some games but in the case for videoslots for example, that's worth it for the knowing you will be paid no problems and fast.
They need a profit margin to be a fair business.

Win big on one of the lesser known "max rtp" casinos and you may be in trouble.
 
Win big on one of the lesser known "max rtp" casinos and you may be in trouble.

Do you really believe this with the ukgc regulated casinos, that a less known casino may not pay out, or perhaps drag their heels and slow pay?

--------------

Ladbrokes and coral can certainly afford to offer 96% PnG instead of 94%, it's just pure greed for more profit that they don't, players should vote with their feet.

There's no rule that when the taxes were originally decided they were set at the perfect level, they may have been too low when all things are considered.

I hope players aren't left in a situation where only dodgy casinos with poor customer service are offering the higher rtp versions.
 
This is a nice honest reply From l&l.
The sites with lower RTP are certainly not to be Avoided. TheYou might get a Lower RTP for some games but in the case for videoslots for example, that's worth it for the knowing you will be paid no problems and fast.
They need a profit margin to be a fair business.

Win big on one of the lesser known "max rtp" casinos and you may be in trouble.

I disagree. Getting paid is not something that should be a factor in what makes a great casino. It should be given. Failing in this category is either bad business (if getting paid is not smooth) or criminal (if payments are denied without a legal reason).

Return to player is critical and any casino that chooses the lower ones are not great casinos imo. Sure, they might have some things going for them, but I personally avoid playing games with poorer rtp. If for no other reason than for the fact it's taking a piss at players.
 
This is a nice honest reply From l&l.
The sites with lower RTP are certainly not to be Avoided. TheYou might get a Lower RTP for some games but in the case for videoslots for example, that's worth it for the knowing you will be paid no problems and fast.
They need a profit margin to be a fair business.

Win big on one of the lesser known "max rtp" casinos and you may be in trouble.

I can get paid faster from Coral than Videoslots if I pop to a shop, and SkyVegas (who's games are all the highest rtp). Casumo pay in 24 hours or less, all games run at the highest RTP, LeoVegas the same. LV Bet always paid within a couple of hours, all at high RTP. Which ones of those do you think would have problems withdrawing from?
 
I disagree. Getting paid is not something that should be a factor in what makes a great casino. It should be given. Failing in this category is either bad business (if getting paid is not smooth) or criminal (if payments are denied without a legal reason).

Return to player is critical and any casino that chooses the lower ones are not great casinos imo. Sure, they might have some things going for them, but I personally avoid playing games with poorer rtp. If for no other reason than for the fact it's taking a piss at players.

I disagree partly, LOL

Yes RTP matters if your playing hundreds of thousands or millions of games on the slots in question but do you really think its going to make a difference on a game that has billions or trillions of game rounds to choose from?

I really dont think its worth getting too bee in your bonnet about as I said last year when VS was reported to lower some RTPs I and others close to the industry said that others will follow suit and they have. By the end of this year its almost a certainty that others will also have lower some that haven't previously.

I also predict the ones that are higher at the moment will also start to lower over the next year to 18 months, feel free to correct me mid 2021 if I was wrong.

Slots are for entertainment, not a way of making money, look at it a different way playing slots on say 94.5% as opposed to 96% is going to cost you 1.5% more now just like train tickets increased 2.7% and everything else that goes up year on year.

Most things cost more year on year whether it be a service or goods, why should slot playing entertainment be any different really????

If it really means that much to you, go play at the ones that have the higher RTP ( while you can ) and stop moaning about the ones that are lower no one is forcing you to play them. :D
 
Do you really believe this with the ukgc regulated casinos, that a less known casino may not pay out, or perhaps drag their heels and slow pay?

--------------

Ladbrokes and coral can certainly afford to offer 96% PnG instead of 94%, it's just pure greed for more profit that they don't, players should vote with their feet.

I have to correct you here though, wouldn't say its greed. It's a business decision after operating in 2015/2016 with a gross margin of lets say 40% and moving forward to 2019 the gross margin was all of a sudden 10%. Shareholders start moaning, board needs to make a decision, you lower spend (which is not always possible) or generate more revenues by mix of measures, including adjusting the RTPs.

That's my 2 cents :)
 
Slots are for entertainment, not a way of making money, look at it a different way playing slots on say 94.5% as opposed to 96% is going to cost you 1.5% more now just like train tickets increased 2.7% and everything else that goes up year on year.

Most things cost more year on year whether it be a service or goods, why should slot playing entertainment be any different really????

You'd be happy to see the rtp lowered each and every year then :eek: :laugh:...return to player says it all, the more that is returned to you, the more entertaining it is surely?,

Yes there is a lot of crud netent/re tiger variance games at 96% but on the whole, higher rtp gives the slot designer more to play with, to create the entertainment :confused:
 
You'd be happy to see the rtp lowered each and every year then :eek: :laugh:...return to player says it all, the more that is returned to you, the more entertaining it is surely?,

Yes there is a lot of crud netent/re tiger variance games at 96% but on the whole, higher rtp gives the slot designer more to play with, to create the entertainment :confused:

No of course I wouldn't be happy if they dropped each year, I would stop playing if it got to below 94% TBH but there is two ways to force more revenue and were starting to see more of both.

1. Lower RTPs
2. Higher min stakes

There is more and more games coming out that have 40p,50p, 60p min stakes etc which is also disappointing, but again can be walked away from, even though I often play way about those stakes I hate games that force a higher min stake.

I have lost count of the amount of games I have opened lately and closed without even playing a spin due to the min stake.
 
For those times when 5% house edge just isn't enough

I would be still ok with 94% online purely due to my local B&M casinos are generally 88-92%

But the fact I have had many nice hits and profitable sessions even at those lower RTPs don't over concern me playing at 94% etc and anything above is a bonus.
 
Last edited:
I disagree partly, LOL

Yes RTP matters if your playing hundreds of thousands or millions of games on the slots in question but do you really think its going to make a difference on a game that has billions or trillions of game rounds to choose from?

I really dont think its worth getting too bee in your bonnet about as I said last year when VS was reported to lower some RTPs I and others close to the industry said that others will follow suit and they have. By the end of this year its almost a certainty that others will also have lower some that haven't previously.

I also predict the ones that are higher at the moment will also start to lower over the next year to 18 months, feel free to correct me mid 2021 if I was wrong.

Slots are for entertainment, not a way of making money, look at it a different way playing slots on say 94.5% as opposed to 96% is going to cost you 1.5% more now just like train tickets increased 2.7% and everything else that goes up year on year.

Most things cost more year on year whether it be a service or goods, why should slot playing entertainment be any different really????

If it really means that much to you, go play at the ones that have the higher RTP ( while you can ) and stop moaning about the ones that are lower no one is forcing you to play them. :D


I wasn't moaning. :)

And I thought I said I try to avoid games with inferior rtp. And why shouldn't I? I mean this all about playtime in the end. And if I have two slots side by side and the other has a better rtp, why in earth I would choose the inferior one? Because the wallpaper looks nicer behind it?

Like I said, everyone chooses what they look in a casino. Some are indifferent to lower rtps. I'm not. Still not moaning rather than stating my opinion on the subject matter. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top