What Are Your Views On This Please !!!!

chipper1973

Dormant Account
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Location
@ my PC
yeah it was but they prolly got fed up with all thos withdrawals, but like you said for WH this amount is peanuts and pretty weird think to do

I guess that could be the reason but something doesn't add up here to me. Have WH got a rep here ? I've looked but couldn't spot anybody....:cool:
 

Jennifer

Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
Joined
Oct 2, 2011
Location
canada
for such small and ridixulous deposits (not at all but quite a few) it costs them money and time. It ties up their staff and I believe there are processing fee's that the casino swallows. They figure the guy is more of a pain, while winning than worth their time. Given his deposit.withdraw history, he will never be a "valued" custimer.

If what Im reading is at face value than WH is still in the wrong here. Its actually quite disgusting to be honest.
 

SAunnyS72

On a Break
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Location
Australia
There is always more to a story.

I normally get more gifts and bonuses from IRL casinos and online casinos when I make bucket loads from them. I always thought that they want me back to put it all back in :)

I have a feeling there must be a "red flag" system for any casino based on certain things. Like land based casinos have made "card counting" illegal if a device is used ... Or like Alan (Hangover) said "frowned upon" ... When it comes to online casinos , they cannot check every single persons computer to see what software they are running along with their casino software.

I am not for a moment insinuating that this is th case here ... But there maybe reasons why someone could be flagged for making constant withdrawals .... Could be they just blocked him for a while to see if he was indeed using some sort of a mechanism ... He will probably be let back in once in the clear.
 

The Viking

Paleo Meister (means really, really old)
CAG
MM
Joined
Oct 3, 2010
Location
Faroe Islands
There is always more to a story.

I normally get more gifts and bonuses from IRL casinos and online casinos when I make bucket loads from them. I always thought that they want me back to put it all back in :)

I have a feeling there must be a "red flag" system for any casino based on certain things. Like land based casinos have made "card counting" illegal if a device is used ... Or like Alan (Hangover) said "frowned upon" ... When it comes to online casinos , they cannot check every single persons computer to see what software they are running along with their casino software.

I am not for a moment insinuating that this is th case here ... But there maybe reasons why someone could be flagged for making constant withdrawals .... Could be they just blocked him for a while to see if he was indeed using some sort of a mechanism ... He will probably be let back in once in the clear.

yep the system are probably just checking him out i mean anyone who makes 40 witdrawals no matter how big they are from a single deposit, some bells must ring
 

chipper1973

Dormant Account
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Location
@ my PC
I think there IS more to this story somewhere.....

Why discourage a roulette player to play roulette :confused: & after only small amounts have been won:confused:
 

swampwitch

ProfessionalUnderachiever
Joined
Nov 20, 2002
Location
Iowa, dammit.
The OP posts a link to a forum that promotes roulette "systems".
Spam 1.

Click the OP's link, and first thing you see is a popup ad for a roulette "system".
Spam 2.

Get into the meat of the thread, and there's a link to the roulette "system" that that the OP of THAT thread uses.
Spam 3.

Then we find out that the problem isn't one of stealing winnings, but of the casino forcing the player to take a bit of a breather on live roulette...NOT because he was using a system, but more likely because there were many many cashouts and very few deposits.

Why was it necessary to inflict layers of bogus "system" advertising on the membership here in order to tell a story that the OP here could have just told us in a few sentences?
 

Nifty29

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 20, 2001
Location
Turn right, then right. then right again
It would have been more polite to actually describe the issue yourself instead of just posting a link to some other site and asking what we think. It's not good etiquette.

Sounds like a case of a casino not wanting someone's action, and that is perfectly OK and well within the rules of any casino. Looks like some kind of system, so wh should have just let them keep going because they would lose eventually. The problem in the meantime could be the processing costs of all those withdrawals, which may be the actual reason for the ban.

The link takes you to a thread titled "WH are a*sholes" which should have told you that it wasn't appropriate to insert the link.
 

chipper1973

Dormant Account
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Location
@ my PC
The OP posts a link to a forum that promotes roulette "systems".
Spam 1.

What the owner of that forum does re advertising is HIS business not mine

Click the OP's link, and first thing you see is a popup ad for a roulette "system".
Spam 2.

What the owner of that forum does re advertising is HIS business not mine

Get into the meat of the thread, and there's a link to the roulette "system" that that the OP of THAT thread uses.
Spam 3.

yes so what ??

Then we find out that the problem isn't one of stealing winnings, but of the casino forcing the player to take a bit of a breather on live roulette...NOT because he was using a system, but more likely because there were many many cashouts and very few deposits.

I thought it would be a interesting post for ppl to discuss on a gaming forum!!

Why was it necessary to inflict layers of bogus "system" advertising on the membership here in order to tell a story that the OP here could have just told us in a few sentences?

So I should of cut n pasted EVERY reply in that thread ?? Is that what your saying ?? If this article had been from a newspaper would you of accused me of being a stooge for Asda or Tesco's ??

Your implying I'm a scammer and I take great offence at that because I'm not, simple as :eek::eek:
 

chipper1973

Dormant Account
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Location
@ my PC
It would have been more polite to actually describe the issue yourself instead of just posting a link to some other site and asking what we think. It's not good etiquette.

Point taken.....

Sounds like a case of a casino not wanting someone's action, and that is perfectly OK and well within the rules of any casino. Looks like some kind of system, so wh should have just let them keep going because they would lose eventually. The problem in the meantime could be the processing costs of all those withdrawals, which may be the actual reason for the ban.

Could Be :thumbsup:

The link takes you to a thread titled "WH are a*sholes" which should have told you that it wasn't appropriate to insert the link.

Again point taken n sry

Mods/admin please feel free to do what you wish with the link I've posted. :thumbsup:
 

SAunnyS72

On a Break
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Location
Australia
Sorry for being a grammar Nazi...

So I should of ("have" is the required word here ) cut n pasted EVERY reply in that thread ?? Is that what your ("you're or you are" is the required word(s) here ) saying ?? If this article had been from a newspaper would you of ("have" is the required word here )accused me of ("perfect use of "of" 10 points")being a stooge for Asda or Tesco's ??

Your ("you're or you are" is the required word(s) here ) implying I'm a scammer and I take great offence at that because I'm not, simple as :eek::eek:
 

chuchu59

gambling addict
PABnonaccred
CAG
PABinit
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Location
SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Yikes, being put in my place AGAIN !!!!

but thxs for righting my wrong :thumbsup:

Ah, I actually thought you would be saying 'righting my left'.:D

A casino can choose which customers they want as long as they pay in full what the customer won whilst he was a player. However, they should make the whole damn 'ousting' more palatable to the customer.They can have any reason in the book for ousting a customer even as far as 'we dont like your face' but they must provide the player with a graceful exit. That's what CS is for.
 

chipper1973

Dormant Account
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Location
@ my PC
Ah, I actually thought you would be saying 'righting my left'.:D

A casino can choose which customers they want as long as they pay in full what the customer won whilst he was a player. However, they should make the whole damn 'ousting' more palatable to the customer.They can have any reason in the book for ousting a customer even as far as 'we dont like your face' but they must provide the player with a graceful exit. That's what CS is for.

Many thxs for an actual reply about the thread I posted :thumbsup:

Seems like many many replies ago :cool:

I still think it's strange practice by WH considering game being played and amount of monies won.
 
Top