1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Watch those fake IDs

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by Casinomeister, Apr 21, 2005.

    Apr 21, 2005
  1. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    Perhaps I should have a "Pitch a Bitch" of the week. Here's this week's highlight:

    Firstly, I'm well aware that this is more likely to end me up in the evil players section or at least the stupid players one. It is a problem of my own making but I feel that it would be reasonable for them to pay out my winnings. Below is the most recent email I sent them after being informed of the reason for my cash in being rejected. The details of the problem are in it.

    Hi,

    Im writing with regard to a withdrawal I made which has just been refused for reasons of fraud by your payment processors. I am aware of the reason for this and it is my own fault. I sent you two copies of my drivers liscense, one had a birthday of 1982, the other said 1986. Obviously the 1982 birthdate did not match the one listed on my account as it had been doctored by me previously. The reason it was doctored had nothing to do with this withdrawal or with your casino. The doctored copy was stored on my computer under a very similar filename to the genuine one and it was accidentally sent to you. I had doctored the copy a few months previously when dealing with a different casino who for some reason had imposed a minimum age of 21. I wanted to sign up to their casino and didn't think it would do any harm if I changed my birthdate when registering. Being unfamiliar with internet casinos, I wasnt aware that they would likely ask for ID to verify it. I played at their casino and enjoyed it, making a considerable profit. However when asked for ID I panicked thinking they would refuse me my winnings. By playing on photoshop I was able to change the 86 for a 82.

    This was obviously a wrong thing to do but I'm sure you can appreciate my worry at being refused my winnings. Unfortunately, this copy was stored on my computer and when I played at your casino I accidentally sent the faked version instead. There was obviouisly no reason to do this as I am both legal age and above the minimum age for your casino. It was careless and when you requested a copy again I was still unaware that I had sent the fake one originally and so this time sent the genuine one. The irregularities were spotted and you requested that in addition I send a copy of my passport. This was 100% genuine and matched the 1986 birthdate on my genuine drivers lisence. I understand that this problem is entirely of my own making but at no point have I tried to defraud your casino. In the case of the original casino also I was not stealing money from the casino, merely trying to protect my winnings, stupidly of course. I would be very happy to comply with any additional security checks you would like to do and can send my physical driving liscense if neccessary.
    +++++++++++++++++++++


    Well guess what the casino said when I forwarded this to them :D

    At least I tried!
     
  2. Apr 21, 2005
  3. Petunia

    Petunia Dormant account

    ** OH goodness!! what the heck was it thinking?! Well, it takes all sorts to make up an industry riiiight? **
     
  4. Apr 21, 2005
  5. Vesuvio

    Vesuvio Dormant account

    Location:
    UK
    Amusing, I agree, but surely the casino should pay out in this case? The drivers licence (with 1986!) appears genuine and can be backed up by other evidence. So there's no question of the player's identity (previous bad character, perhaps :D). I'm guessing this is probably one of the more questionable casinos that will seize any opportunity available to refuse a withdrawal?
     
  6. Apr 21, 2005
  7. Petunia

    Petunia Dormant account

    **Vesuvio, i do hope you meant that in jest! **
     
  8. Apr 21, 2005
  9. Vesuvio

    Vesuvio Dormant account

    Location:
    UK
    No, I'm completely serious (well, 80% at least ;))! I see where you're coming from, but it's pretty clear he wasn't out to defraud the casino and it's just an unfortunate and rather comical error.

    I'm sure he's unnecesarily broken terms and conditions so the casino can justify not paying him, but morally if they don't I think that's on the same level as his creative photoshopping!
     
  10. Apr 21, 2005
  11. sripal32

    sripal32 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Network Engg
    Location:
    UK
    hmmmmmmm

    May be (s)he is faking all the other documents too ?
    :oops:
     
  12. Apr 21, 2005
  13. caruso

    caruso Banned User - repetitive violations of 1.6 - troll

    Occupation:
    Casino apologist
    Location:
    England
    He sent FAKED ID, is clearly a cheat, and you reckon should be paid??

    The casino is entirely in the right, and the player is a cheat and an idiot to boot. The fact that his cheating was only revealed by his own incompetence is nothing to do with anything. "Oops, sorry Mr. Policeman - if I'd known you were there I'd never have done the robbery." LOL.

    I'm surprised Bryan even gave this one the time of day, other than blacklisting the player.
     
  14. Apr 21, 2005
  15. Petunia

    Petunia Dormant account

    ** I'd have to say, on this ocasion I have to disagree! EDIT: With Vesuvio : END EDIT From the casino's point of view this would be how i'd think:

    1) What are you doing with a fake ID in the first place, in MOST countries it is illegal!
    2) Are you sorry you got caught, or are you sorry for sending in a fake ID, or all of the above?
    3) Why do we have to now spend recourses to try and find out if ALL your other documents are not false AS WELL?
    4) WHY did you panic? What made you think that you could be refused your winnings in the first place that forced you to MISTAKENLY send a false id? Your story does not wash - you state clearly that the fake one is kept seperately, so you CHOSE to use it!
    5) Have you used the other ID to sign up with another account with the casino (or any other casino) and how do we know that you did not just get mixed up with which fake doc goes with wich account?
    6) Rather go, we'll refund your money.

    AND if the casinos had any sense, they'd alert the cops too. There are too much of this going on with ID fraud and ID Theft... sorry, I have NO sympathy. YOu lie, you cheat and you defraud... and say "Sorry" and expect to get away with it? Nuh-uh... but that is just me I guess!! **
     
  16. Apr 21, 2005
  17. jetset

    jetset Ueber Meister CAG

    Occupation:
    Senior Partner, InfoPowa News Service
    Location:
    Earth
    This is something of a red letter week for me - I find myself agreeing with Caruso for the second time!
     
  18. Apr 21, 2005
  19. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    Sometimes I'm just a big teddy bear :D
     
  20. Apr 21, 2005
  21. Vesuvio

    Vesuvio Dormant account

    Location:
    UK
    Ok, this is clearly a losing battle, but for what it's worth!

    The ID seems to be genuine... except for the date of birth! How can it be illegal to have an altered scan on your computer - yep, sending it is another matter!
    Well, all of the above presumably! There doesn't appear to have been a reason to send the altered scan.
    Hmmm, it's not a huge amount of resources is it? If this reasoning was allowed to wash casinos could get away with anything! Ooops, I forgot they already do...
    He was asked to send ID and sent the wrong scan. That seems like a simple mistake to make (I've sent the wrong scan before, though not a falsified one, I hasten to add!). Of course he might always send the wrong scan and not check the age requirements of the particular casino in question - now that would be truly stupid... but it's not clear if it's the case.
    The only difference is the date of birth, though, so it'd hardly be suitable for opening another account unless the casino didn't mind having someone with the same name & other details.

    Admittedly I can see a case for saying 'once a cheat always a cheat', or something similar, but it's not an entirely convincing reason not to pay someone who played at your casino & who you can't show is someone other than they say they are (the point of these checks - not to assess general character).
     
  22. Apr 21, 2005
  23. Vesuvio

    Vesuvio Dormant account

    Location:
    UK
    Once more into the breach...
    Yes, he sent faked ID and clearly has cheated at another casino before. I can't see any intent to defraud at the casino in question, though. I do think he should be paid, though I doubt he's got a cat in hell's chance of it and he's only got himself to blame!
    Hard to judge if he's an idiot on the basis of what he sent to Bryan. His incompetence was that he wasn't cheating the casino but cheated himself out of money due to him in this case.

    Ok, I'll stop trying to defend what's probably the indefensible now!
     
  24. Apr 21, 2005
  25. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    Assuming the facts as reported by the player are true, I think 100% the casino should pay up.
    He is of legal age, and has not deliberately tried to defraud this particular casino - just made a silly error.
    Who here has never done something stupid in their lives? :oops:

    Once again, the casino has taken the money, allowed him to play, and only caused a fuss when it's time to pay up.
    This is totally out of order (but just what we've come to expect these days).
     
  26. Apr 21, 2005
  27. Dirk Diggler

    Dirk Diggler Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Company Secretary
    Location:
    UK
    I've also got to agree that the casino should pay if the facts stated are true.

    The player hasn't tried to cheat or defraud that casino, they just sent them fake ID as well as real ID. Their admittance for cheating other casinos in the past should not effect this issue.

    Still got to be one of the funniest and stupidest things to possibly do though :notworthy
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2005
  28. Apr 21, 2005
  29. meh

    meh Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    England
    I think the casino is completely in the wrong in this situation. The IDs he sent (apart from the fake one!) are obviously genuine and he's offered to send his physical driving license as well. They can't refuse him a payout based on what he's done at other casinos.
    I certainly won't be playing here in future.
     
  30. Apr 21, 2005
  31. Petunia

    Petunia Dormant account

    **we would have to agree to disagree. I am not changing my mind. This person committed a CRIME. Accident or no. There is NO EXCUSE for having a FAKE ID in the FIRST place as far as I'm concerned. I have done many stupid things in my life, but NONE of them could end me up in JAIL. At most, i'd expect the casino to give back the deposit and close the account.

    Vevusio - you pulled my whole mail apart, and I enjoyed your presentation very much ! :notworthy

    I guess its just me then... lol **
     
  32. Apr 21, 2005
  33. thelawnet

    thelawnet Dormant account

    Occupation:
    programmer
    Location:
    UK

    I have to agree that he does not seem to have broken any rules at this casino and should be paid. He is however an idiot and perhaps deserves it.

    He didn't do a very good job of explaining himself, but if he had come up with a better explanation for the forged ID; e.g., he was trying to order liquor online, I don't see why this should affect things.

    I don't see that he has broken any terms and conditions so they should pay him.

    If they don't want to pay him they should refund his deposit (minus perhaps any processing costs), as it does not seem reasonable that they keep his money. If he was not legal to play, his money should be refunded, as age limits are for the protection of the vulnerable, not for the enrichment of the casino.
     
  34. Apr 21, 2005
  35. Macgyver

    Macgyver Dormant account PABnononaccred

    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Look at it from this point of view:

    In the U.S., a cop stops someone under the age of 21 for speeding. The officer asks for ID and the driver accidentally gives the cop their fake ID, which is a legitimate I.D. with the birthdate altered so the person is over 21.

    When the person opens his wallet and gives the fake ID, the officer sees another ID and asks for it. This ID, in fact, is the driver's legitimate ID showing he's under 21.

    What does the cop do?

    He seizes BOTH IDs (maybe just the fake one, depends on the state) and charges the driver with possessing a fraudulent ID. Heck, even if the driver gave the cop the legitimate ID and the cop merely saw the fake (it wasn't being passed off as legit), in most states, the driver would still be charged.

    Forget it, I wholeheartedly agree with Petunia. If you don't have enough common sense about IDs, you shouldn't be playing in online casinos anyway.
     
  36. Apr 21, 2005
  37. arbster

    arbster Dormant account

    Location:
    UK
    I'm not sure if you're missing the point here, Petunia. He didn't have a fake ID, he had an image of one - is that actually a crime, and in what jurisdiction? Secondly, the casino in question does not have a minimum age of 21, therefore by playing there he broke no rules. They're getting het up about something which is essentially not their problem. He is of legal age for gambling, has abided by their T&Cs and volunteered all the ID they have requested (plus a spurious bit they could have done without). They should definitely pay out - if they choose not to I hope that their name will make it into the public domain, as they are clearly one of those unpleasant casinos/groups that will seize on anything to avoid paying winning players - I wonder if they would have returned his deposit intact had he lost it before this issue came to light? I very much doubt it.

    In summary, unless this casino wants to appoint itself as the ID police, they should pay up and shut up.
     
  38. Apr 21, 2005
  39. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    Playing where? :confused: I didn't see the casino name posted anywhere.

    I would bet it's a Rip-off The Gamblers one though! :machinegu
     

Share This Page