Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Recent Forum Threads
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
Recent News
zizacon said:Hello!
I read the article here at casinomeister about Virtual Casino. And I got the impression that they have become better. What do you think? Is it posible to trust them nowdays?
casinomeister said:If you join one of their casinos, please keep in mind their terms and conditions that limit payouts. There are plenty of other casinos that don't do this.
zizacon...
So considering the risks, how are Virtual casino compared to Cirrus and betroyal?..
nafanny29 said:Zizacon there are 1000s of casinos online. Why risk putting money into one that has knowingly screwed lots of players.
Yes the bonuses are tempting but $1000000 bonus with 1 time playthrough is worthless if they aint gonna pay you.
zizacon said:The point is, if you haven't got it yet, That They acctually have paid me at CIRRUS which is in the same group. And actually none is listed, from what I know, as an Evil casino, then what's the problem? People are obviously getting their money allthough you can't withdraw it all at the same time, but hey, who cares, I still earn so much on their generous bonus offers as long as they continue having them.
lanidar said:I got your point zizacon.
Good for you....you got paid.
Not many other people have gotten paid.
Good luck to you with any future deposits you may make there.
We all have our opinions regarding The Virtual Group.
phynqster said:scrollock,
I take offence to the reply that Virtual spammed the boards with players claiming to be paid. I can assure you that over the last two years there was never ever spamming like that. In fact I encouraged players not to post, because of the way they would be treated by certain forum members. You would be suprised by the number of forum members here who were paid, they just don't post every time they get paid from a casino. Other experienced members of the forum here who have triple digits in posts, might have never even played at Virtual, because they are veterens of reading the history of events there, so they have no bases to post. In no way is this post meant to recomend Virtual, just to disclose a mis belief.
scrollock said:Hi phyngster! (formerly known as virtual ted) how you been?
scrollock said:what about virtual staff spamming the boards???
Outdated URL (Invalid)
but their again, i cant really accuse you of spamming the board as that board is OWNED by virtual.
caruso said:This is nonsense. Virtual Ted is no longer an employee of Virtual since he moved back to the USA, and has no reason to post anything on behalf of Virtual. The above poster signed up a year ago, well before Ted left and stopped posting. There is obviously no connection.
For all Virtual's faults, Ted did a good job there. He's also been answering questions on aspects of the inner workings of casinos and his role at Virtual for some time now on the "Sucks" board. Contact him there if you want, he's entirely responsive.
zizacon said:Exuse the language at the following post..
You stupid fools obviously don't understand what I'm asking for here. You claim that people don't get paid at the Virtual group. Well I have heard that ten times now, can you back it up with something, or maybe I can't read english properly (at least not spell it, obviously from Sweden). However, I Haven't seen Cirrus, virtual or Coolcat listed as rouge or Evil anywhere, which was the point here. Personally I couldn't care less if they spam around or not, sure non professional, but all I want is getting paid here. Get the point? I also read an article here on Casinomeister that said Virtual had become better, maybe they WERE rouge, but not listed as it anymore at least. As the creator of the thread I would like us to stick to the subject.
OT: What does Virtual TED has to do with this anyway?