1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Virtual Casino Cipher work-up

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by cipher, Sep 17, 2004.

    Sep 17, 2004
  1. cipher

    cipher Banned member - being a jerk

    First off there are certain techniques that I've employed in the Virtual Casino session work-up as attached hereto. Let me say this, I've had the benefit of better than six years now in compiling Cipher strands and interpreting trend analysis and there are certain techniques that I feel comfortable in using.

    Under no circumstances do I recommend to anyone that they venture into such techniques without a thorough understanding of trend analysis. The screen shots of the techniques employed herein are meant for illustrative purposes only.

    If you'll look at hand #67 as well as hand #92 you'll see that both of those hands are hands that could not have normally been won by the player. By paying attention to the values as they were recorded I was able to "steal" both hands #67 and #92 which made for a profitable session rather than a losing session. Have a good one.
     
  2. Sep 17, 2004
  3. Macgyver

    Macgyver Dormant account PABnononaccred

    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Holy cow, Cipher! :notworthy

    Your "juevos" must be the size of grapefruits! :eek2:

    Just kidding, awesome to see such good hits though I'll stick to my flat-betting myself. Good one! :thumbsup:
     
  4. Sep 17, 2004
  5. sw2003

    sw2003 Dormant account

    Location:
    somewhere :)
    If only I could perform such steals myself! :oops:
     
  6. Sep 18, 2004
  7. caruso

    caruso Banned User - repetitive violations of 1.6 - troll

    Occupation:
    Casino apologist
    Location:
    England
    Those are certainly some spectacular strategy deviations (splitting 5s against a 6 and doubling down on a 7), and in this particular instance you're correct - basic strategy would have lost both hands. In order to make the above statement "could not have normally been won by the player" you would have to have either "known" that a 10 was the hole card in 67, to be followed by a 7 off the top of the deck, and that the order of cards in 92 would be 2, 3 and 4, with a 6 in the hole - consigning the player to low hands and dealer 19 and 21 - or have "known" the specific order of wins and losses ("trends"). But in the latter case, you would simply play optimal strategy and let the "trend" take care of itself - so you must be alluding to predicting the actual card values.

    Feel free to clarify any of the above. :)
     
  8. Sep 18, 2004
  9. bethug

    bethug Banned User - Winner of the "<a href="http://www.c

    i truly believe this, you cant play basic stragdy to long oon any online casino but stanley and con and maybe oasis

    i believe some software detect your playing pattern and adjust to it
     
  10. Sep 18, 2004
  11. cipher

    cipher Banned member - being a jerk

    Bethug, You go straight to the head of the class my friend. It's my opinion that every system out there starts out random until it's figured out your game play and what particular strategy you are using. Good job Bethug!!
     
  12. Sep 18, 2004
  13. cipher

    cipher Banned member - being a jerk

    If you look at the separations screen shot that I've provided, you can clearly see the "dumping" and "seeding" of prime valued cards for the situations of both of those hands. It's not rocket science but you've got to be able to see it as it's happening. Have a good one.
     
  14. Sep 18, 2004
  15. bewitch

    bewitch Dormant account

    Location:
    Home, sweet home
    This is very interesting and scary at same time. It's a liitle bite too "intelligent" for me, but I sure like to know more. Cipher, bethug, are you going to Vegas together next month? I would like to meet you guys, so you can explain to me :D

    Have a great weekend!!!
     
  16. Sep 18, 2004
  17. sw2003

    sw2003 Dormant account

    Location:
    somewhere :)

    The 10 wasn't the hole card in 67, the 4 is! Or you mean the next card coming out of the deck was a 10 (which isn't called the hole card technically)? If you start using the wrong terminology, it confuses other readers who are trying to understand what you are saying.

    In #67, cipher split a pair of 10's versus dealer's 10. Then doubled down
    on 12 vs 10 and let stand the other 17.

    In #92, cipher split a pair of 5's versus dealer's 6 and then doubled down on 9 vs 6 and 7 vs 6.

    Note that cipher did some other deviations from basic strategy that did not work out, for example #89: 15 vs 4; #82: 10 vs A (it was only a $2 bet), #66: 12 vs 4.

    Then there are other deviations that did, for example #64: split 7's vs 10; #24: doubled on 9 vs 8.
     
  18. Sep 18, 2004
  19. sw2003

    sw2003 Dormant account

    Location:
    somewhere :)
    Prime valued cards? You have got to explain that, I see 2, 4 beside the 5, 7. In any case how is that helping you to win? Or when you see a bunch of small prime cards, dealer is going to be hit by a 10 and therefore busting? Are you sort of counting cards?
     
  20. Sep 18, 2004
  21. cynowoo

    cynowoo Banned User

    Location:
    NEW YORK
    Cipher , welcome back.

    you play real mode or fun mode ?

    I heard many forums had ban VISUAL casino in the blacklist

    How soon is their payout speed? any DOCs required ?

    Thanks , have a good one.
     
  22. Sep 18, 2004
  23. cipher

    cipher Banned member - being a jerk

    With internet blackjack I generally find when there are a great many similarly valued cards you can generally classify that happening as a "dump" and I've seen it time and time again where that type of thing plays havoc with the continuity of a session. Have a good one.
     
  24. Sep 18, 2004
  25. cipher

    cipher Banned member - being a jerk

    Hi Cynowoo, I'm assuming that you're talking about Virtual casino and not Visual casino. I'll be the first to admit that Virtual has had some pretty tough times in the past. But having said that, I'm pretty impressed with some of the things that are finally coming about there at Virtual as a result of Ted being there.

    I originally set my account up there years ago and I did at one time have a serious run in with the management at that time on a $10,000.00 blackjack win that they had refused to pay. That incident was pretty well covered here and at the prescription. The long a short of it was they ultimately paid.

    As for what their requirements are now I would make absolutely certain that you read and understand totally what their current requirements are and if you have any question don't hesitate to call Ted at Virtual for clarification. Have a good one.
     
  26. Sep 18, 2004
  27. caruso

    caruso Banned User - repetitive violations of 1.6 - troll

    Occupation:
    Casino apologist
    Location:
    England
    No, it's you who don't understand the terminology - or RTG gameplay. The "hole card" is the down card. In 67, the 4 is the up card, and the 10 is the hole card. The hole card lies underneath the upcard, to the left, and is always the leftmost card of the dealer hand with RTG. It is NOT the second card from the left. He split 10s against 4, not 10.

    Load up an RTG and take look at it in play mode, you'll soon get the idea.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2004
  28. Sep 18, 2004
  29. mucullus

    mucullus Experienced Member

    Location:
    Germany
    I think if the software is rigged and wants to take you down there is no need to detect s.o. playing pattern. It simply lets you bust or has some "lucky hands" for the dealer. Whether you follow basic strategy, hood 3000 system or whatever.
     
  30. Sep 18, 2004
  31. spearmaster

    spearmaster RIP Ted

    Occupation:
    Devil's Advocate
    Location:
    Heaven
    WB Cipher :) You're going to have to teach me trend spotting over a beer next month!
     
  32. Sep 18, 2004
  33. cipher

    cipher Banned member - being a jerk

    Spear, I don't know how successful you will be with the beer in your hand, but "I'll give it a a go old boy." Have a good one.
     
  34. Sep 22, 2004
  35. sw2003

    sw2003 Dormant account

    Location:
    somewhere :)

    So the order of the cards of the hands in the actual record in the html file isn't according to the order of appearance? That sucks!

    The first card is actually the second card and the hole card is the first??
    What sort of screwed up order is this?
     
  36. Sep 26, 2004
  37. bobbyblackjack

    bobbyblackjack Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Sales Manager
    Location:
    Here
    BJ is my favourite game, this is very interesting. Are you saying you know what the cards are before they come out ? You must to do what you did in those cases otherwise why would you do what you did ? Can you share your secret with us , is this a well known technique that you are using ? I mean i occassionally do what you did above but out of boredom not skill :) .
     
  38. Sep 26, 2004
  39. largeeyes

    largeeyes Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    North America
    Why would a rogue casino cheat this way? Why not just cheat by making sure the card that comes out will be a winner for the house? This stuff about seeding cascading down the line is silly. WHy go to that trouble and not just flat out cheat?
     

Share This Page