Videoslots - Newly Accredited

[deepsky2]

Hello everyone,

As we have been expanding into more regulated markets, we have unfortunately not had the resources to sustain different RTPs for all the different markets. Due to this we decided to make the RTP the same for all our markets.

Best regards,
Team Videoslots.

I personally don't buy it, you got away with lowering the RTP in one market and I bet you had every intention to do the same for all from the beginning, it's was just a matter of when. Then again I have never run an online casino but I do think a lot has to do with greed and how far can you push it. It's very noticeable and has been for some time. I just can imagine how poor playtime will be with Videoslots in the future.

 

[Steviedoo]

Well fast cashouts might be great but with those rtps ...what cashouts?

Play n go
Red tiger
Pragmatic

Are there any other providers that you have lowered the rtp?

 

[Kroffe]

Well fast cashouts might be great but with those rtps ...what cashouts?

Play n go
Red tiger
Pragmatic

Are there any other providers that you have lowered the rtp?

IGT was also included in the original list of providers that would get lower rtp.

 

[pinnit2014]

I presume the standardisation to the higher RTP's was off the table pretty quickly?

Yeah, some may say 'well that's the way places are going to survive' but it's pretty moot when you can go to other places who haven't done this.

Personally, I've gave VS a tenner over the last 3 months; i got to level 21 and that's been it. Funnily enough, the allure of 10p battles for 2,500 wagering hasn't been enough to entice me back.

 

[nikantw]

If you think how RTP works (can read all about it in the thread in my signature), you may wonder:

If I play long enough I will lose my deposit, no matter if the RTP is 94% or 97%. Why the change?

Obviously the answer is: Because with 94% you will lose a lot faster, like half the time faster!

Also, this is why the havy unreasonable taxes on gambling are dangerous for the players.

 

[shadow123]

Checking the rtp,s on Red Tiger games yesterday, at VS mystery reels megaways is set at just over
93% while at Ladbrokes it's over 98%, massive difference.Even for those not too bothered about
rtp levels there is really no point in playing that game at VS

 

[steveh35]

Checking the rtp,s on Red Tiger games yesterday, at VS mystery reels megaways is set at just over
93% while at Ladbrokes it's over 98%, massive difference.Even for those not too bothered about
rtp levels there is really no point in playing that game at VS

VS have the jackpot version which is why it is much lower.

 

[shadow123]

Nah the, jackpot contribution is less than 1 % still 4% difference and you can feel the difference in the way it plays

 

[deleted_user-20231116]

@Team.Videoslots Looks like all Merkur slots except Magic mirror deluxe 2 are back for Norwegian players, that's awesome! Thanks.

 

[nikantw]

VS have the jackpot version which is why it is much lower.

That made me look and I see no jackpot anywhere. Only for UK players maybe?
Roguebet has it and the RTP is 1% lower than VS so I think the 1% for the jackpot contribution is correct.

 

[shadow123]

There are some big differences with Red Tigers rtp,s ,think at Ladbrokes some games with the jackpot are
showing as below 92%, dont think Red Tiger are doing themselves any favours shaving off 1% and running
at levels as low as that as the average player has next to no chance of winning a jackpot and just end up
with games that play shit.

 

[colinsunderland]

Nah the, jackpot contribution is less than 1 % still 4% difference and you can feel the difference in the way it plays

Haven't got a ladbrokes account to check, but Coral who usually use the same servers etc, have mystery reels megaways jackpot version, set at 93.01%

 

[shadow123]

Just checked, Ladbrokes have Mystery Reels megaway with no jackpot, rtp is 98.06%

 

[ChopleyIOM]

Not a pleasant video to make, but what a fall from grace for Videoslots.

 

[colinsunderland]

I thought people were saying Videoslots were lower on mystery reels because it was the jackpot version, that isn't the jackpot version in the video and it's only 93%. 5% lower, wow.

 

[Mouche12]

Guts, as far as I've checked on the above games, also (still) run on the highest RTPs.

 

[Mr_Slot5]

That mystery reels RTP is horrific and it makes you wonder if they'll go even lower with the Play n Go RTPs eventually.

When the likes of Casumo and Leo Vegas can offer the full RTP, why can't Videoslots?

 

[steveh35]

And people will still vote them Casino of the year like they did last year.

 

[PMKFRUITPRO]

Just watched chops vid.

I wasn’t aware myself but as a UK player I pretty much gave up depositing at videoslots when I found out we were getting fucked over the first time round.

The problem I guess is that all the thousands of casual players that still play at videoslots will be completely unaware of what’s happened, and I guess videoslots won’t be in a hurry to tell them.

Ur now basically playing the equivalent of service station %ages in the online world!!!

Why on earth would anybody in the ‘know’ choose to deposit there knowing they can simply log in somewhere else and get a much fairer and longer stint elsewhere.

Disgraceful IMO. Hope it catches up with them.

 

[Nicola]

And people will still vote them Casino of the year like they did last year.

I voted VideoSlots last year, but no way could I do that this year. This forum and the CM brand is built on trust and fair play so it would be against the ethics.

However, VideoSlots is still my go-to site everyday and luckily I only play slots which haven't been nerfed yet!

 

[09237653]

If your RTPs are lower than partycasino's you've definitely gone wrong somewhere.

 

[goatwack]

Well, to the average Joe, reducing RTP isn't going to phase them terribly. Slot designers quite clearly think we're chumps with their modern money-hoover creations, and so punters will play them regardless and fill companies' coffers with blissful indifference.

And as mentioned prior, your average un-clued-up punter isn't going to scoff at a couple of % reduction off RTP, so long as the games are bright and 'entertaining'.

So basically all VS are doing is looking at the bigger picture and pool of players and thinking 'What the hell do they care'

 

[Reelsoffun]

Who even plays red tiger, pragmatic, IGT etc etc .......... LOL

 

[Lemon]

I wouldn't play Red Tiger slots even if they were on 101%, so it makes no difference to me

But I cannot understand why providers can't just state 93% + 2% = 95% for slots that have linked jackpots. How hard can it be to inform the player properly?

And why the fuck IGT have to show a range instead of the exact RTP% God only knows. I simply won't play any of their slots because I'm scared it might be the lowest end of the range. I'm sure many other players feel the same. Just show the exact value for fuck's sake. You're costing yourself money, and your games are shit.

 

[shadow123]

Who even plays red tiger, pragmatic, IGT etc etc .......... LOL

I love red tiger games, won more on those than the rest put together,recently turned £47 weekend cashback into 2k.