Untamed Bengal Tiger New Slot

please help me to understand how can you get a 180.000EURO win as they claim because from my calculation the maximum win is 5 euro wild line x 243 lines x 15 (maximum bet 4.5 is 0.30 x 15) = 18225 EURO !!! :eek:

how can you get 180.000EURO!?? :what:
 
please help me to understand how can you get a 180.000EURO win as they claim because from my calculation the maximum win is 5 euro wild line x 243 lines x 15 (maximum bet 4.5 is 0.30 x 15) = 18225 EURO !!! :eek:

how can you get 180.000EURO!?? :what:
Where does it say you can win €180,000 :confused:
The UK version says the max win is £90,000 - with the same max bet limit (£4.50/spin)

Mind you, £90,000 must be an approximate value because the only way you could get anything close to that is if you hit 5 trailing wilds in position 1 of all 5 reels every 4th spin during free-spins. That ain't NEVER gonna happen, but if it did, the win would be a lot more than £90,000 (but less than £180,000 - I think)

KK
 
hit 5 trailing wilds in position 1 of all 5 reels every 4th spin during free-spins cannot give you over 90.000
if the all WILDs win is 18225 EURO * 4 = 72900 Euro....

I'm very curious about their calculations...

see below for my print screens with 180.000EURO. First was 90.000 in my game too, but 2 days after they change to 180.000... strange

180000.jpg
1800.jpg
 
It does say win up to £90 000 on my ladbrokes account. I think they may get this amount from using the needle gamble feature this may be the max payout available to gamble to. They dont say what the gamble limit is on the pays screen.

Ive played this gamble feature in UK bookmakers and this gamble feature isnt limited to only 4 gambles like the normal gamble features.You gamble a percentage of your choice of the winnings until you lose or reach a limit.
 
hit 5 trailing wilds in position 1 of all 5 reels every 4th spin during free-spins cannot give you over 90.000
if the all WILDs win is 18225 EURO * 4 = 72900 Euro....
Yes it can:

Spin 1: 5 wilds on the top row = 1 win x £75 = £75
Spin 2: 2 wilds on each reel = 32 wins x £75 = £2,400
Spin 3: 3 wilds on each reel = 243 wins x £75 = £18,225
Start again on next spin until 20 free-spins are finished:
Spin 4: £75
Spin 5: £2,400
Spin 6: £18,225
Spin 7: £75
Spin 8: £2,400
Spin 9: £18,225
Spin 10: £75
Spin 11: £2,400
Spin 12: £18,225
Spin 13: £75
Spin 14: £2,400
Spin 15: £18,225
Spin 16: £75
Spin 17: £2,400
Spin 18: £18,225
Spin 19: £75
Spin 20: £2,400

That adds up to £126,675 with just the wilds alone - so it would be more than that with the other win combinations made as well.
Of course, the chances of that happening are many megagazzillions to one - but it could happen!

KK
 
Oh heck,
Released on 6th June :eek:

Looks like this one could have sticky wilds in the free spin feature

Quote....With Lucky Nudge™, if a scatter symbol appears when there are two other scatters on the reels, a ‘peeking’ scatter, just above or below the reel edges, may trigger the Free Spins feature, again aiding a player’s hopes of a bigger payout. The Free Spins feature also introduces a new Wild feature – The Brilliant Wilds™ Feature – which holds the Wilds that land on screen for the remaining spins of Free Spins feature.
 
if you click on the bet text itself you can change coin size. and then up your bet to 22.50 euro. that gives a max payout of 91125 euros.


Old Attachment (Invalid)
 
if you click on the bet text itself you can change coin size. and then up your bet to 22.50 euro. that gives a max payout of 91125 euros.
Well bugger me (not literally!) - why did MG hide that little feature down there! :confused:

Thanks for giving us the REAL answer to this conundrum! :thumbsup:

KK
 
I had another 30-minute free play attack on this today after the 1 1/2 hours earlier in the week, and still came to the same conclusion; execrable.
That's why I love this forum - you learn something EVERY day!
Execrable - I've never heard of that word before :thumbsup:

KK
 
ex·e·cra·ble
   [ek-si-kruh-buhl]

adjective
1.
utterly detestable; abominable; abhorrent.

2.
very bad: an execrable stage performance.

Origin:
1350–1400 for earlier sense “expressing a curse”; 1480–90 for def. 1; Middle English < Latin ex ( s ) ecrābilis accursed, detestable. See execrate, -able

Related forms
ex·e·cra·ble·ness, noun

ex·e·cra·bly, adverb
 
...and there came three adjectives I never seen before either:rolleyes:

I have to fix some kind of program that translate the words I need translated immediately. I know they exists, just havn't found them yet:)
 
Ah Tirilej, did you know English has over 100,000 words (and that is excluding the Latin dictionary which is used mainly for references i.e. species) and the average naturally English-speaking person only uses 3,500 different words in their lifetime?
In fact in some areas of England they get by on 35 in a lifetime, including 'gissa' 'guilty' 'oi' and wot'.
 
Ah Tirilej, did you know English has over 100,000 words (and that is excluding the Latin dictionary which is used mainly for references i.e. species) and the average naturally English-speaking person only uses 3,500 different words in their lifetime?
In fact in some areas of England they get by on 35 in a lifetime, including 'gissa' 'guilty' 'oi' and wot'.

I know it's a lot and I wonder how many words I have learned on my years here? Probably around 1500, not to forget some grammar and spelling. I thought I was good before but now I know I am:D

It has been an expensive journey but with so much fun and so much knowledge that it has been worth every cent:)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top