Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Recent Forum Threads
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
Recent News
There isn't one. No doubt the casinos boycotted it because it would let people know exactly where they were with bonuses and they'd be less likely to exceed the requirements "just to be sure".tiger2006 said:Where is the total Wagering Button?
Vesuvio said:There isn't one. No doubt the casinos boycotted it because it would let people know exactly where they were with bonuses and they'd be less likely to exceed the requirements "just to be sure".
You either have to keep track while you play (there's also a stats button - at the newer software version a "%" sign), contact support (perfectly normal - they must spend their lives answering that sort of query) or try cutting and pasting into Excel and using the summing tools there. Not exactly ideal!
There's no need for them to provide a tool for telling you if you've met the bonus requirements. All they need to do is to allow you to know how much you've played on each game - i.e. something like the crypto log viewer which tells you you've played $1500 on BJ, $100 on slots and so on. The player can then check (s)he's done what's required. This has been talked about for years (and is the main thing people using Playcheck require) so I don't think there's a shadow of a doubt as to why such a simple thing hasn't been implemented.spearmaster said:I don't believe it's a casino issue at all, in that they would "boycott" it - in my opinion I think we've overlooked the fact that some casinos apply different calculation methods for playthrough, such as counting blackjack as half, etc. What should be a simple tool if it was a standard 1x calculation with game exclusions becomes quite complicated when you have varying methods of determining what play calculates at what percentage of the total requirement.
Vesuvio said:... so I don't think there's a shadow of a doubt as to why such a simple thing hasn't been implemented.
I don't want to get into another mammoth thread here. I was just trying to help someone out. My view of Playcheck is pretty much accepted, as far as I'm aware - I certainly don't think it's "narrow".spearmaster said:You seem to have taken a very narrow view of things lately. You also appear unwilling to consider any other possibility but yours.
How do you find the total wagering for each game without adding up all the individual entries? (have they changed it so you can?)spearmaster said:What you are asking for is already available in Playcheck - you can select to view stats by game if you like.
Vesuvio said:I don't want to get into another mammoth thread here. I was just trying to help someone out. My view of Playcheck is pretty much accepted, as far as I'm aware - I certainly don't think it's "narrow".
How do you find the total wagering for each game without adding up all the individual entries? (have they changed it so you can?)
As for the new games - that just supports the argument that a minor adjustment to playcheck wouldn't be beyond them.
It's a very widely-held view. Whether a majority of players hold it or not, I don't know. You don't either.spearmaster said:In my opinion, "beyond a shadow of a doubt" is not pretty much accepted. And, this was in the context of "casino boycotting" the type of tool which you are suggesting - which is definitely not a widely-held view.
They've had 3 or 4 years.spearmaster said:Furthermore, as I pointed out before, it makes sense to work on a much more useful tool than something which simply adds sums and still leaves the player with numerous calculations to do.
We'll have to agree to disagree here. If player priorities were an issue this would have been implented many moons ago.spearmaster said:They've had very minor improvements since then so I agree it's time for some work - but again it will probably come down to their view of player priorities.
Good comparison - another example of "player priorities" at work.pacers31 said:It is along the same ridiculous lines as "Reverse Withdrawls", only useful to the casino!
pacers31 said:I too agree that the playcheck feature is difficult and cumbersome. Sure the info is there, but you have to add up the number of bets at what amount in order to know where you stand. Why isn't there a simple meter that displays the total bets placed during a given session?
Totally agree Playcheck is a piece of manure.Vesuvio said:I don't want to get into another mammoth thread here. I was just trying to help someone out. My view of Playcheck is pretty much accepted, as far as I'm aware - I certainly don't think it's "narrow".