tklein
Dormant account
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Location
- near Hamburg
When I started the thread, I wasn't aware of the extra terms that can be read on the ...currentoffers site of iNetBet.
One of you told me, I read it and knew I won't get the mon. OK. I said it's solved for me.
But after that point, the thread was just about the behaviour of the casino.
And if you count my posts (just a few) and the posts of the other posters, you find there was quite some interest in discussion.
Why close the thread. Sure, maybe it's not good for the casino reputaion, but the casino didn't do anything against their terms, so it's just "behaviour".
The title was changed...isn't that enough ?
And voiding ALL winnings for effectively nothing is...hmm.. one can discuss about, no ?
Most casinos would just void the winnings of the not counting game, if there were any.
It's not YOUR waste of time, as you wrote in the explatation of the thread closure.
One of you told me, I read it and knew I won't get the mon. OK. I said it's solved for me.
But after that point, the thread was just about the behaviour of the casino.
And if you count my posts (just a few) and the posts of the other posters, you find there was quite some interest in discussion.
Why close the thread. Sure, maybe it's not good for the casino reputaion, but the casino didn't do anything against their terms, so it's just "behaviour".
The title was changed...isn't that enough ?
And voiding ALL winnings for effectively nothing is...hmm.. one can discuss about, no ?
Most casinos would just void the winnings of the not counting game, if there were any.
It's not YOUR waste of time, as you wrote in the explatation of the thread closure.
