1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice

Poll:Best Screenshot of the Month?



Candidates Revealed...Cast your vote!.
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

They're Baaack - Next Round of Subpoenas Targets Esquire

Discussion in 'Casino Industry Discussion' started by Casinomeister, Apr 26, 2005.

    Apr 26, 2005
  1. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    They're Baaack - Next Round of Subpoenas Targets Esquire
    by Kevin Smith

    Any thoughts that the interactive gambling industry's advertising dilemma was nearing an end were debunked this week by news of subpoenas handed out on April 12 to Esquire magazine publisher Kevin O'Malley and nearly a dozen members of the magazine's staff.

    The recent action, brought to light Wednesday by a New York Post article, is related to the magazine's April issue, which features an eight-page insert billed as the "Gentleman's Guide to Poker" and sponsored by BoDog Poker. The insert includes BoDog CEO Calvin Ayre's photo and his tips for playing Texas Hold 'Em online, along with several references to the BoDog Poker URL and images from the site. It also includes a greeting from Ayre, who invites readers to "join me online at the tables and see why the world is playing poker at Bodog.com," and the disclaimer: "Void where prohibited by law. Fully licensed in Costa Rica."

    Full report here:
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
     
  2. Apr 26, 2005
  3. dominique

    dominique Dormant account

    Occupation:
    webmistress
    Location:
    The Boonies
    I don't see how they have a legal foot to stand on.
     
  4. Apr 27, 2005
  5. jerryg

    jerryg Dormant account

    Aiding and Abetting? I just don't see it.

    From FindLaw...


    I just don't see them being able to prove that over a magazine ad. They would have to first prove that BoDog was in violation of the law, then prove that the magazine was aware of a crime being committed and opted to help anyway. I'm not sure they can prove either, but the second is almost impossible to prove unless you have hard evidence (tape recordings, memos, etc), which you just aren't going to have unless someone is truly aiding and abetting criminal activity (not the case here).

    The article also said that carrying the ads is in violation of the "Interstate Telephone Act of 1964". It's hard to imagine how a magazine ad is in violation of any telecommunications law. Impossible for me to say though, as I could find no such listing in legal archives or even at house.gov. Maybe it is a phantom law that only exists in intimidation letters. If someone can find a link to the text of this act, I would like to be able to read it.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2005
  6. Apr 27, 2005
  7. mary

    mary Dormant account

    Stretching a bit here...some magazines are printed in different plants in different parts of the country. I suppose if the layout of the offending ads were to be transmitted over the Internet via phone lines...

    That's the best I can do.

    We call that "putting seatbelts on the Enterprise" around here. Like, "Why don't they have seatbelts on the Enterprise? You can see people getting hurled around." so then we make up reasons why they don't have seatbelts on the Enterprise.
     
  8. Apr 27, 2005
  9. winbig

    winbig Keep winning this amount.

    Occupation:
    Bum
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I say if they can allow tobacco companies to advertise in print media, why not casinos? Cigarettes kill, casinos don't. :confused:


    [edit]

    PS: I love your enterprise analogy....very fitting :lolup:
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2005

Share This Page