vinylweatherman
You type well loads
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2004
- Location
- United Kingdom
I think they're feeling the pressure.
I have been forwarded several copies of emails to affiliates where there is an implicit threat that if affiliates post nasty things on the message boards they will not be assisted in getting their money.
Here's the content of one email (I see these guys still have some trouble with the definitions "Licensor" and "Licensee"):
"Dear xxxxxx
This email is designed to advise you of the situation with your affiliate payment.
Normally a Licencee would not intervene however as stated in our first email, we view affiliates as important to a business such as Online Gaming.
The previous owners have not responded to our requests for payment of affiliates, the affiliate payments were made solely by the Casino Owner and Marketing Team.
Rather than let the affiliates sought (sic) out the situation with the Previous Management on their own we are going to investigate a method that we can provide some assistance in this area.
Negative Postings and bad press although may be justified on the previous owners , it not in the interest of anyone and we will only support affiliates that support us in this matter.
So please whilst we find an amicable solution we ask that no postings, blogs or general comments are made, if a posting is made by an affiliate we will not be inclined to assist them in resolving this situation, as we did not create this unfortunate situation .
We will require a further 7 days to resolve this issue as we are not going to see a response from the Owners and any solution can only come from the software supplier.
Thank you for your understanding.
Casino Licensee (sic)"
How will they know WHICH affiliates made the negative comments if said affiliates ensure they do not include any information that enables their forum handle being connected to their affiliate tag.
Given that who is to blame is a matter of dispute (it seems), then this is only the opinion of one party, and the other party may well feel that negatve press be directed at the software providers, and not the previous owners.
The new owners will suffer from this, as the brand has lost all credibility, and will need to rebuild it from scratch. Earlier we were told (when inchilli was in trouble) that Hype was unconnected, and was absolutely fine! This was not true, Hype was just not in such bad shape at the time, and were able to maintain their credibility for a further couple of months.
While unrelated casinos do share software, unconnected casinos do not normally go bust within months of each other. When the old Captain Cooks went under, we didn't see other MG casinos collapse a couple of months later.
I don't mind that they may now not help me "reclaim my affiliate payments", as I have never been one
This E-mail seeks to curb forum discussion on this issue, and provided rumour is not presented as fact, such discussion should continue. If no pressure had been applied in the first place, no doubt there would have been no offer of help in the first place, and players would eventually find out about the new owners, and affiliates would have to take a loss of a few months payments and sign up again with the new owners (who I am sure would inherit players, but not liabilities to affiliates).