Suggestion to all members about this site

Ok,I would not have used the same language and wordings if I was him but I do understand the deeper thoughts OP has.
Sometimes it might seem the case that Bryan and his team choose the casino's side where maybe the player should have been backed.
But I think we cannot always make a clear judgement on that as we simply do not know all the facts on the table.

.

Understand his thoughts? Its not even his complaint. This is a very weird for a bystander to post this.

I can understand sometimes facts are not always out there in detail in certain situations and PAB's. But in this case we have all the facts.

1) Put fake # in
2) Terms state 12. The player is required to provide their complete, current and full personal details, including a phone number where they can be contacted. Incomplete, inaccurate or fraudulent information may result in the player’s account being closed and any bonuses and winnings being removed.

So its not neccessarily CM taking a side, the facts are presented a term was broke and they decided not to pay. Its really pretty simple.

It's "you're" not "your".

Maybe there's another brother...???

I was thinking the same exact thing. The OP has 54 posts has been what seems "personally involved" because of the tone of his posts on this matter. Then to actually go and start a thread like this when its not even you who didnt get paid :what: Brother, Friend, Multi account, who knows?
 
So its not neccessarily CM taking a side, the facts are presented a term was broke and they decided not to pay. Its really pretty simple.

What is frustrating is that most of these people - the ones who are trying to make it look like I'm unethical and biased - have not even read what I posted about the High Noon matter. It was a business decision made by the casino. The casino administration did not want to deal with this player (and his brother) anymore; the casino support was absolutely fed up. That's' their right. It's just like I reserve the right to ban users from this forum if they make personal attacks, defraud casinos, post spam, or conduct themselves like dicks.

And sure, I'll close a thread when the topic has been exasperated, or when members start contacting me asking me to put a fork in it. And if you act like an a-hole, you'll get banned. And if a thread is so off topic to its pertaining forum section, it'll get moved to the attic. There are reasons for most everything I do, but the reasons aren't as pernicious as some of these people would like you to believe.

I'm sure they'll all make a collective moan when I move this thread to the attic. :rolleyes:
 
What is frustrating is that most of these people - the ones who are trying to make it look like I'm unethical and biased - have not even read what I posted about the High Noon matter. It was a business decision made by the casino. The casino administration did not want to deal with this player (and his brother) anymore; the casino support was absolutely fed up. That's' their right. It's just like I reserve the right to ban users from this forum if they make personal attacks, defraud casinos, post spam, or conduct themselves like dicks.

And sure, I'll close a thread when the topic has been exasperated, or when members start contacting me asking me to put a fork in it. And if you act like an a-hole, you'll get banned. And if a thread is so off topic to its pertaining forum section, it'll get moved to the attic. There are reasons for most everything I do, but the reasons aren't as pernicious as some of these people would like you to believe.

I'm sure they'll all make a collective moan when I move this thread to the attic. :rolleyes:

Exactly that was the problem with the thread it was an attack and not a discussion.

I stated from my first post on that thread that I was 50-50 in terms of supporting the decision to pay/not pay. I could have possibly also engaged in a discussion of whether it was petty to not pay, but after the personal attack on the casino I just decided to take the stance of you broke the terms, too bad and took the broken terms side 100%.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Click here for Red Cherry Casino

Meister Ratings

Back
Top