- Joined
- May 22, 2012
Not bad, quite volatile IMO.
Okay, so you were playing this on 0.20 bets and lost 50 quid with really no worthy wins and the 2x free spins paid horrible. Imagine playing this on €1.00-€2.00 stakes. It would have fleeced you from a 100 or 200 quid deposit in no time.
Will not try this game for real money I think.
Play n Go is fabricating some absolute sh*t lately.
But thanks for the upload mate. Good warning to all of us.
What is this crap lately where slots pay you a gazillion 0.1x - 1x bet hits..
It makes you feel you are winning but your balance is only slowly dropping.
In the old fruity days playing slots in b&m casinos at least the minimum win was 1x stake (at least in The Netherlands).
1 cherry on reel one always paid 1x or 2x stake.
These fractional wins are utter rubbish and I think this was discussed before on this forum. It leads people to believe they are actually hitting wins but technically all these "wins" under 1x bet are losing spins, that's the way I see it.
Getting 0.1x your stake is not really a win if you ask me.
For a time I had Play'nGo down as one of my 'go-to' providers based on their low roller friendliness, Cloud Quest et al.
I don't mind the clumps of micro-wins but the balance on their games is way off. Low Variance becomes moot when the average payouts are 94- something percent, and at no point do their games feel as though they're leading up to anything other than death by a thousand spins.
I also encountered Thunderkick, which crucially are not only are more engaging, but give you the feeling of winning, as well as realizing their potential. P'nG is the equivalent of squatting over a gutter and chucking ten pence pieces into it at 5-second intervals
I'm sorry, Cloud Quest must have been high variance and I just didn't know it!Cloud Quest???????
View attachment 94690