... was going to leave you a comment ... I figured you had the comment part turned off.
Yes, comments are turned off in the Bitch'Blog. Given the subject matter it seemed like too easy a target for comment abuse: the last thing I need is more messes to clean up. Bummer that we lose the useful comments too but there you go I guess.
This is partly my reason for updating the
BitchMeister Blog: it's New! Improved! Old-Fashioned! thread on a regular basis. Gives folks a place to comment on the Blog, raise issues, etc, if they really want to.
re: "New PABs" ... I was thinking that it would be nice if you had the time to actually list the casinos ....
I can certainly understand why that would be of interest but in all honesty we figured it would be more head-ache than it was worth.
What we've seen in the past is that if we report raw complaints data then the casinos start to freak out and get on our ass for "giving the wrong impression". I shouldn't speak of it so flippantly, they have a point.
The argument goes like this: (a) I post 'Casino X had three PABs this week', (b) Casino X then gets on my tits about how this issue was this and that issue was that ... bottom line: now in addition to dealing with the PABs I have to deal with their PR freak-outs and .... Too much!
So, better to just report the resolved ones 'cause (a) that's interesting too and (b) no one is likely to bitch and complain about it.
As to naming the Rogues and Fraudsters: ok, maybe the Rogues 'cause they've earned it. As to the fraudsters ... I'm less comfortable with that because we're naming members who may or may not be allowed back in the future and ... just seems needlessly complicated to me for what amounts to a good bit of gossip. I don' t really see the benefits there. In a way the same could be said for the Rogues, though admittedly I'm having trouble convincing even myself of that.
I also think you are doing a hell of a good job here ...
Cheers, thanks for saying so.
PS. You were right, I hadn't seen this go up. Thanks for letting me know.