vinylweatherman
You type well loads
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2004
- Location
- United Kingdom
We prompt the complainant to send any messages we have sent him to the moderators, we have never been manipulative in any way. Even though he has been hostile and made personal attacks on our staff members, we have remained professional on every single occasion.
Our communication yesterday was to inform him that a mediator has been appointed and that he will be informed in detail by Dec 3rd. As we have already stated apart from his play, there are problems with his account information. The mediation process will give the complainant a chance to resolve such issues and have his case reviewed by an independent third party.
This is our one and only open complaint since 2008! Statements referring to negative press or open complaints, please bring them to our attention and we will do our best to resolve them. In the event such statements are posted without any facts or based on assumptions we have no choice but to consider them as biased and defamatory.
This is our final statement regarding this case and as of today we consider this issue closed. When the resolution process has concluded we will return to inform the community here accordingly.
Of course thats why you sent me this :
Expired Image
In your emails you have never talked about problems with account information .
You startet that after i made this issue public .
I have sent it already in Pms and i say it again : you deceived the wrong person .
It looks like the problem is ONLY with his play. Did this play breach the terms, or did it "violate the spirit in which the promotion was offered".
If it's the latter, and you stick to this, don't be surprised to end up where other casinos that deny winnings based on this vague "violated the spirit of..." argument.
YOU made Heador the offer in the first place, WHY you did so - God knows You KNEW how he played BEFORE you made the offer, yet you went ahead anyway. WTF did you expect, that for the first time ever YOU would be the casino where Heador played like a "newbie" and lost everything.
The Rival central player rating system is now general knowledge, so WE know that YOU know a great deal about Heador's style at other Rival casinos, yet you still took a risk and made him an offer he would very likely beat.
Heador also took a risk in giving more of his custom to Rival casinos, when it was clear they were making up more and more excuses to wriggle out of paying players. The PAB service is a limited resource, and is free to use. To ensure there is enough capacity in the system, limits are placed on when the PAB service can be used, and at present this is ONE per member for a non-accredited casino, after which they may only make further PABs against accredited casinos.
This encourages players to make better choices, but in doing so tries to "starve" rogue casinos of customers by steering players to the accredited sites on pain of being "on their own" in future disputes at non-accredited sites.
Without access to the PAB service in this case, Heador has to make his own way to a resolution, and whereas an issue is meant to be kept out of the public gaze during a PAB, these is no incentive for this when PAB is no longer an option.
It is all very well saying "a mediator has been appointed", but why can't you tell Heador WHO has been appointed. I am sure he wants an INDEPENDENT mediator, and NOT someone appointed by the casino who may very well have decided the case in favour of the casino before the process has even begun.
Steve Russo has ALREADY mediated, but the casino didn't like the outcome, so decided it didn't count. This is not how mediation is supposed to work. What if this new mediator rules for Heador, does the casino accept this, or again ditch the result and appoint further mediators until they find one who comes up with the correct result.