DamianaRaven
Dormant account
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2013
- Location
- Irving, TX
As I'm sure many of you know, WorldWinner is a "skill gaming" website, which is how they skirt the legalities of American gambling laws. Their games are fun and for the most part, they seem to be an honest company, but some of their policies don't seem quite respectable to me. The main problem I have with them is their "FairMatching" system, which they use to match players of comparable skill level in tournaments. Of course, they claim that this is done in the interest of fair play, but I think their motives are more self-serving. Frankly, the whole thing seems set up to keep any one person from winning more half the time. Since their money is made by taking a percentage of each prize pool, I don't see why they should be allowed to manipulate a player's chances of winning just because a certain degree of "skill" is involved. Essentially, their FairMatch system seems designed to keep people from winning. In fact, they will flat-out refuse to let people play if they win too often, by stating that there are "no available opponents at your skill level... at this time." Outdated URL (Invalid) Their advice to players in this position is to pick another game (one you're not as good at, obviously) or keep trying until they found somebody you couldn't consistently beat.
At this point, I should probably mention that my interest in this matter is purely academic - my total losses for their site amount to a whopping $20, which was literally YEARS ago. Even then, I wasn't angry about the loss, nor did I get all shocked and suspicious that winning got A LOT harder once money was at stake. That actually makes sense if you think about it - I certainly didn't waste much money on games I wasn't good at, so I never expected others would. The only thing that really bothered me was that the company was straight up manipulating a player's odds of winning while sanctimoniously claiming that it's done for the players' benefit. In any event, I just wanted to clarify that I'm not seeking any kind of "retribution" against this site, nor am I claiming that they've outright scammed me or anyone else that I'm aware of. I'd just like to understand how they're able to get away with this policy - if a casino tried to do this at their blackjack or poker tables, I imagine everyone involved would flip out directly and call shenanigans. How is it not cheating on their part when they are deliberately creating a "challenge" for people who are NOT playing for fun and giggles?
See Related Threads:
At this point, I should probably mention that my interest in this matter is purely academic - my total losses for their site amount to a whopping $20, which was literally YEARS ago. Even then, I wasn't angry about the loss, nor did I get all shocked and suspicious that winning got A LOT harder once money was at stake. That actually makes sense if you think about it - I certainly didn't waste much money on games I wasn't good at, so I never expected others would. The only thing that really bothered me was that the company was straight up manipulating a player's odds of winning while sanctimoniously claiming that it's done for the players' benefit. In any event, I just wanted to clarify that I'm not seeking any kind of "retribution" against this site, nor am I claiming that they've outright scammed me or anyone else that I'm aware of. I'd just like to understand how they're able to get away with this policy - if a casino tried to do this at their blackjack or poker tables, I imagine everyone involved would flip out directly and call shenanigans. How is it not cheating on their part when they are deliberately creating a "challenge" for people who are NOT playing for fun and giggles?
See Related Threads:
Last edited by a moderator: