Should I ditch the RTG for good?

[Jasminebed]

Actually, if you are quite okay with not cashing out as often, it's quite alright to play $1 spins with $75. And if you are playing with a bonus, you might as well bet large or go home, why so many casinos have max percentage rules in place. Make sure you read Terms and Conditions.

All our deposit and withdrawal methods cost us money somewhere, and for all non-US players, there are exchange fees somewhere along the line. And US players get hit with larger fees, all of which cut into our less than the house edge expectations.

The OP has lost a lot with quite reasonable RTPs, except the last spell. The next hit might be the big one, but it might just as well be more of the same. Past results have no bearing on future results.

If there was a Win switch, a casino would turn it back on to retain this customer.

I actually voted no, not forever for this poll. But if the OP is not having a good time playing the software, then play what he enjoys.

While I don't play as much RTG as other platforms, I play regularly. I believe that if you play turbo play and autospin, you get many more spins per min that other platforms, which really translates into losing your money faster. But if you do have a decent hit, you can clear WR a little faster too.

I've only won one RJ (kinda), a minor on Triple Twister when it first came out. I think I was the first poster with a minor in the Winner's Screenshot thread.

I'm pretty sure I'm no where near 90 overall. But I have a had bit of luck lately, and I will continue to deposit with RTG, but probably still at lesser levels than other softwares.

I'm still in the Never Say Never camp.

But if you are not feeling good about how things are going, time to go somewhere else.

 

[Nifty29]

I

No, but he deserves a lashing over a recommendation like that. 1-1.25 per spin $75 minimum deposit! LOL!

Dave, you have once again shown that you cannot make a genuine contribution to any thread. You are either lambasting another poster, or a casino.

I told you for $1 VP I.e $5 per spin you should allow $500 I.e 100 hands or $1k I.e 200 hands. I said below that I suggested a MINIMUM of $75 for $1 spins I.e 75 spins. I didn't say it was the IDEAL amount as many people can't afford $200 a pop. If you serious questioning my credibility based on that, then I suggest you obtain some credibility yourself first, and THEN test it out here.

I would say it is almost certain that my results are better than yours simply because I have discipline and I understand the games, and you clearly do not. Discipline was the underlying message of my advice.

Mind you, I don't know why you even bothered reading my post, given that all the games are RIGGED I TELLS YA!!

 

[Cleveland]

No, but he deserves a lashing over a recommendation like that. 1-1.25 per spin $75 minimum deposit! LOL!

The key parts of his sentence was actually the word "minimum" and Bet according to bankroll. He isn't saying anybody should bet a 1.00 a spin on a 75.00 deposit, he is saying that if you want to roll at a 1.00 a spin you need to have AT LEAST deposit a "minimum" of 75.00. He is talking to players such as myself who have a bad habit of betting too high in comparison to our deposit. He was just giving a starting point, not an end all be all bet amount.

 

[daveboz]

I

Dave, you have once again shown that you cannot make a genuine contribution to any thread. You are either lambasting another poster, or a casino.

I told you for $1 VP I.e $5 per spin you should allow $500 I.e 100 hands or $1k I.e 200 hands. I said below that I suggested a MINIMUM of $75 for $1 spins I.e 75 spins. I didn't say it was the IDEAL amount as many people can't afford $200 a pop. If you serious questioning my credibility based on that, then I suggest you obtain some credibility yourself first, and THEN test it out here.

I would say it is almost certain that my results are better than yours simply because I have discipline and I understand the games, and you clearly do not. Discipline was the underlying message of my advice.

Mind you, I don't know why you even bothered reading my post, given that all the games are RIGGED I TELLS YA!!

"I said below that I suggested a MINIMUM of $75 for $1 spins I.e 75 spins"

Exactly, thanks for confirming. Why would you ever make a suggestion like that for a $75 deposit? This coming from a guy with discipline? lol!
You should be saying a minimum of $75 for .25 spins or 300 spins. That would give you some credibility.

 

[daveboz]

The key parts of his sentence was actually the word "minimum" and Bet according to bankroll. He isn't saying anybody should bet a 1.00 a spin on a 75.00 deposit, he is saying that if you want to roll at a 1.00 a spin you need to have AT LEAST deposit a "minimum" of 75.00. He is talking to players such as myself who have a bad habit of betting too high in comparison to our deposit. He was just giving a starting point, not an end all be all bet amount.

That's my point. I'm saying anyone who heeds this advice of "if you want to bet $1 a spin deposit a minimum of $75 " is a casinos dream customer. If you have only $75 you should leave yourself 4x that amount of spins MINIMUM. Nifty doesn't know what he's talking about!

Why are you speaking for him ANYWAY? Why do people on forums always try to answer for others?

 

[Cleveland]

Why are you speaking for him ANYWAY? Why do people on forums always try to answer for others?

So we can't explain things now? Seeing as I understood his post and you didn't I figured I'd break it down in tiny bite size pieces for you.

 

[daveboz]

I

Dave, you have once again shown that you cannot make a genuine contribution to any thread. You are either lambasting another poster, or a casino.

I told you for $1 VP I.e $5 per spin you should allow $500 I.e 100 hands or $1k I.e 200 hands. I said below that I suggested a MINIMUM of $75 for $1 spins I.e 75 spins. I didn't say it was the IDEAL amount as many people can't afford $200 a pop. If you serious questioning my credibility based on that, then I suggest you obtain some credibility yourself first, and THEN test it out here.

I would say it is almost certain that my results are better than yours simply because I have discipline and I understand the games, and you clearly do not. Discipline was the underlying message of my advice.

Mind you, I don't know why you even bothered reading my post, given that all the games are RIGGED I TELLS YA!!

I don't need any credibility I could care less . I was just waiting for the opportunity for you to slip up and lose yours like you just did.
Not once have I lambasted anyone who has not already lambasted me first. Please provide a link to a post that shows otherwise. Besides the well deserved criticism I just gave you. Oh yeah stop back pedaling trying to justify what you meant to say earlier. Dude, you blew it and everyone besides Cleveland Gremmy and Chuchu (sorry Paul) know it.

 

[daveboz]

So we can't explain things now? Seeing as I understood his post and you didn't I figured I'd break it down in tiny bite size pieces for you.

he already tried to explain before your post you must have missed it. Nevertheless, when trying to explain another posters or writers work you should start with..." I think what Nifty was trying to say or meant..or I interpreted...." Instead of responding like it was your own post.

 

[maxd]

... when trying to explain another posters or writers work you should start with..." I think what Nifty was trying to say or meant..or I interpreted...." ....

Please leave the forum moderation to the Moderators. It is not your place to be telling others how to post.

I don't need any credibility ... I was just waiting for the opportunity for you to slip up and lose yours ....

Stalking another forum member, regardless of your reason, is inappropriate behaviour on these forums. I strongly suggest you find something else to do. If the harassment continues your posting rights will be curtailed.

And before anyone wants to pipe up with "Nifty did this or that!!!" you can save it, or post it to me via PM if you must. Nifty has received his own reminder(s) of proper forum etiquette.

 

[Cleveland]

he already tried to explain before your post you must have missed it. Nevertheless, when trying to explain another posters or writers work you should start with..." I think what Nifty was trying to say or meant..or I interpreted...." Instead of responding like it was your own post.

Check our post times....guess he types a tad quicker than me. I understood the post, no need to say "I think." And if I was wrong, I'm sure he would correct me.

 

[DarkMage]

Until a RTG casino pops up in a regulated environment such as Alderney or Gibralter I would write off RTG casinos unless you really enjoy their software and are willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

The fact that RTG was founded in 1998 and not one regulated casino in the mentioned jurisdictions use the RTG software it baffles me as to why that is the case if the software really was on the up and up, I would think casino operators would trip over themselves to provide a new suite of regulated casino games to the European market.

But no...The only ones that use RTG are unregulated casinos in Costa Rica that face the USA crowd(You know the same ones that code your gambling transactions as "furniture"), RTG also has the honor of licensing their software to anyone who has the money(Virtual Casinos anyone?) of course that may be different now...but let's think for a second...who is going to open a USA facing casino in THIS environment? And since we know no European Casino will touch this software I'd be inclined to believe we will not see a new RTG casino for a long time thus it would appear it they are no longer licensing to rogue casinos, but in reality WHO KNOWS?


The day I stopped all deposits across the board on RTG casinos a year ago is the day I started to save a boatload of cash(It's refreshing to play Blackjack at a brick and motor casino and not have regular sessions of losing 19 out 20 playing perfect strategy). When the USA get's it's act together(been 5 YEARS now) and regulates USA gambling maybe RTG can finally prove itself, but I think RTG will die a quick death when the USA get's into the market. Maybe then a bunch of whisleblowers can come out.



or I could be completely WRONG

 

[daveboz]

Please leave the forum moderation to the Moderators. It is not your place to be telling others how to post.




Stalking another forum member, regardless of your reason, is inappropriate behaviour on these forums. I strongly suggest you find something else to do. If the harassment continues your posting rights will be curtailed.

And before anyone wants to pipe up with "Nifty did this or that!!!" you can save it, or post it to me via PM if you must. Nifty has received his own reminder(s) of proper forum etiquette.

Cmon Max...... you know its proper etiquette to paraphrase another's work in the matter I described. I shouldn't have to tell you.

What harassment? Stalking? I was just following the thread which was up top at the time and responded to what I thought was a poor advice. Ok yes, my last post to subject was a bit inflammatory but he can take it, he's a grown man I figure.

 

[daveboz]

Until a RTG casino pops up in a regulated environment such as Alderney or Gibralter I would write off RTG casinos unless you really enjoy their software and are willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

The fact that RTG was founded in 1998 and not one regulated casino in the mentioned jurisdictions use the RTG software it baffles me as to why that is the case if the software really was on the up and up, I would think casino operators would trip over themselves to provide a new suite of regulated casino games to the European market.

But no...The only ones that use RTG are unregulated casinos in Costa Rica that face the USA crowd(You know the same ones that code your gambling transactions as "furniture"), RTG also has the honor of licensing their software to anyone who has the money(Virtual Casinos anyone?) of course that may be different now...but let's think for a second...who is going to open a USA facing casino in THIS environment? And since we know no European Casino will touch this software I'd be inclined to believe we will not see a new RTG casino for a long time thus it would appear it they are no longer licensing to rogue casinos, but in reality WHO KNOWS?


The day I stopped all deposits across the board on RTG casinos a year ago is the day I started to save a boatload of cash(It's refreshing to play Blackjack at a brick and motor casino and not have regular sessions of losing 19 out 20 playing perfect strategy). When the USA get's it's act together(been 5 YEARS now) and regulates USA gambling maybe RTG can finally prove itself, but I think RTG will die a quick death when the USA get's into the market. Maybe then a bunch of whisleblowers can come out.



or I could be completely WRONG

nice post

 

[maxd]

... he can take it, he's a grown man I figure.

That is very much NOT the point. The point is civil and constructive forum behaviour, hence my request.
It's not up to you decide what this or that forum member "can take" because you shouldn't be dishing it out in the first place.
If something needs that kind of attention then report it to us. If that's not the way you want to go then leave it be.

 

[daveboz]

That is very much NOT the point. The point is civil and constructive forum behaviour, hence my request.
It's not up to you decide what this or that forum member "can take" because you shouldn't be dishing it out in the first place.
If something needs that kind of attention then report it to us. If that's not the way you want to go then leave it be.

fair enough

 

[chuchu59]

Check our post times....guess he types a tad quicker than me. I understood the post, no need to say "I think." And if I was wrong, I'm sure he would correct me.

If only we could press the spin button much slower than we type we would be saving ourselves a lot of $$$$$.