No one has done that. The issues (all of them) will be dealt with by the CAP membership one by one and handed over to admin for resolution.
The first issue open for discussion was accreditation of programs, the community ideas and suggestions are being sorted out this week, and presented for consideration the next week. After drafting, the programs will get time to input before a final version is drawn up. This is a legal contract, and after all parties gave their input, lawyers will finalize it. It is not happening over night.
Today I started a new open discussion regarding Board etiquette and bannings and this will be dealt with in the same fashion.
This is the beginning of a more membership driven CAP and in order to allow this, we have to allow the membership time to give the necessary input.
If you are looking for CAP to change things or make statements without collecting membership input first, it is not going to happen.
This is my idea and I stand firmly behind it. My concern lies completely with the membership, and IMO they are the ones who have a right to say what happens in their community.
If the membership is happy with admin's following through, then all is well as far as I am concerned.
All the speculations, opinions or rogueing in the world are not going to stop this process.
I applaud your efforts Dom, but imo you have just presented a glaring example of how the management are unnecessarily creating a rod for their own backs by not COMMUNICATING.
This is the sort of development that shows some sort of positive intent (hopefully) and a company statement explaining what is going on at membership level to address the controversial issues that have been raised over the past several weeks would go at least some way to dispelling the perception that the management couldn't give a stuff.