That's pretty much what i assume most do agree that problem gamblers shouldn't be able to register and these checks need to be done and more accurate what these can be, better.
I still somehow want to believe that quite many operators who have failed to recognize problem gambler, haven't done that with purpose and these checks completed automated checks have been passed even system have tried to recognize problem gambler. One thing is that operators have to pass audits to get their license and then regulator or 3rd party behalf of regulator is completing these audits to operators where these processes need to be documented quite detailed and pass these audits. Failing in audit is hurting operator quite a lot as their license can be revoked, they can be penalised with quite big fines when failures are found and in very minimum they are addressed to fix flaws in their system within very short time.
Quite many audits are completed annually and amount of major flaws found by in these seems not really correlating with amount of failures reported by players (huge majority of players been able to play and found self-excluded at later stage are not sharing these experiences anywhere in internet) and manipulating audits to show outcome which pass to it but is still designed not to recognize problem gamblers with purpose sounds very high shot for operator to try exercise, risk and reward in money can't be that high to spend so much resources trying to create fake system which pass checks but still allow problem gamblers to play.
Then when we see that we have different experiences from same operators, i just find it hard to believe that all casinos are only trying to circumvent their checks which are in place and completed by regulators. Some might not give a shit and be short time happy but can it be said that all or majority of casinos don't even try to follow regulations, if yes, should that regulator do bit more than now if that's what is happening. We mostly have individual failures in processes which might not happen all the time but when certain scenario XYZDOG happen it fails. In perfect world it didn't happen but it does and still i don't believe that all casinos only interest is allow many problem gamblers as possible. If getting to numbers risk vs reward, there just is not enough GS registered or self-excuded players to generate very major source of income to casinos.
For one reason is that these flaws get spotted quite early at the time of first withdrawal or reaching some threshold that more specific checks are done and average value of this segment is not really that huge when you in many cases end up to solve these complaints and put all pieces of information together by people you need to pay salaries. That's pretty much why i find statement that casinos only trying to financially benefit from problem gamblers not to have very strong ground before somebody will explain some bit more detailed numbers about that strategy and it's benefits and i will stand corrected.