This is the new response from the UKGC now. Get a SAR, waste another 30 days, send the SAR on and they do very little unless there have been another 100 complaints of the same nature. The whole thing is designed to ultimately protect the operators in individual cases.
The old too big to fail. I watched a good documentary the other day, Netflix I think it was but may have been amazon prime about HSBC, mostly the scandal involving the known laundering of Mexican cartel money. Obviously it went to the very top of the US legal system but ultimately they got away with a slap on the wrist (fine, which was pittance in comparison to turnover and profit)
I hear a lot of chat about people saying that there will be fewer and fewer choices with all of these new UKGC proposals/implementations, I don’t agree really, for the following reasons:
Gambling is meant to be random/luck so it should not matter where or when you play as to whether you win or lose.
The companies that survive and prosper will be the ones that can be relied to do things properly in terms of RG, Payouts and quality and honest support systems.
As long as the ones that prosper offer the game categories that people will want to play then where is the issue.
I watched Dunovers latest bonanza video on YouTube on my flight home this morning and he talked about it, saying that will he left with the likes of the high street bookmakers.
If that’s the case, based on my experience with the likes of Ladbrokes, betfred, paddy power, I think that’s a good thing, they were all very good and straight.
Others that always impressed me were sky bet, virgin games, bet 365, casino and video slots. There are probably others oh yeah bet Victor.
I’m sure they are not all perfect but that’s my position, the cowboys, then could close tomorrow for all I cared, I only people I would feel for are those that are employed there and do care but a bent business and ethics model dictates otherwise.