I notice attempts at sites with rather less integrity than Casinomeister to deflect / sidetrack this issue with claims about "lack of evidence".
Small reminder:
Hampton's are attempting to void Pirate's $1,300,000 because they claim he used a "robot".
a) They have entirely failed to provide ANY evidence of robot play.
b) They initially attempted to invent a story about "mouse mapping" as an aspect of said evidence(?). RTG themselves squashed that one right here. I quote: The software has no built-in ability to record mouse movements and report that type of activity in any way. Hampton apparently dropped the claim at this point
.
c) They are REFUSING to supply the game logs, in spite of specifically stating on the web site that the "audit trail" IS readily available upon request. I quote: For your added protection we maintain a complete audit trail of each transaction for all the games that you play. At your request we would be pleased to make these files available to you at your request. One can therefore only assume that inspection of the game logs would entirely exonerate the player, otherwise why else withhold them?
d) The casino managers attempts to elicit a confession from the player would be grounds in the view of several legal-eagles here for a case of criminal conspiracy / entrappment.
Yes, there is a serious lack of evidence. But the lack is at the casino end, not the player. The casino has failed to provide ANY evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the player. The evidence they HAVE attempted to provide has been discounted by RTG themselves.
The fact is, Hampton are not voiding these winnings on the basis of player-wrongdoing. If there WAS this evidence, they would have brought it to light. They havent. It doesnt exist. Theyre voiding the winnings because they chose to and believe its their entitlement.
Small reminder:
Hampton's are attempting to void Pirate's $1,300,000 because they claim he used a "robot".
a) They have entirely failed to provide ANY evidence of robot play.
b) They initially attempted to invent a story about "mouse mapping" as an aspect of said evidence(?). RTG themselves squashed that one right here. I quote: The software has no built-in ability to record mouse movements and report that type of activity in any way. Hampton apparently dropped the claim at this point
. c) They are REFUSING to supply the game logs, in spite of specifically stating on the web site that the "audit trail" IS readily available upon request. I quote: For your added protection we maintain a complete audit trail of each transaction for all the games that you play. At your request we would be pleased to make these files available to you at your request. One can therefore only assume that inspection of the game logs would entirely exonerate the player, otherwise why else withhold them?
d) The casino managers attempts to elicit a confession from the player would be grounds in the view of several legal-eagles here for a case of criminal conspiracy / entrappment.
Yes, there is a serious lack of evidence. But the lack is at the casino end, not the player. The casino has failed to provide ANY evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the player. The evidence they HAVE attempted to provide has been discounted by RTG themselves.
The fact is, Hampton are not voiding these winnings on the basis of player-wrongdoing. If there WAS this evidence, they would have brought it to light. They havent. It doesnt exist. Theyre voiding the winnings because they chose to and believe its their entitlement.
It can get worse? Oh yeah, today's newsletter hasn't gone out yet. I guess that's when things get worse 
Meister
