GrandMaster
Dormant account
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2004
- Location
- UK
I noticed one big difference. Since the upgrade I am unable to play BJ, the program just crashes.
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Recent Forum Threads
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
Recent News
RTG_MMcMain said:The only change we made to the latest release is when playing more than one hand at a time. As you may know our software, like all others, shuffle the shoe after each hand is completed. When playing two hands at a time you get two hands before a reshuffle (meaning you can potentially get farther into the shoe). This has the potential to give the player a slight advantage on really long draws but we felt that was statistically neglible and still allowed the casino an adequate house edge.
Therefore, RealTime Gaming has not changed the odds, the deck or the way the cards are dealt for Blackjack in any way. I haven't looked at the statistical samples posted here. Seeing comments on them, however, indicate to me that the sample set is way too low. Someone mentioned 1000 hands but that is not nearly enought to draw a conclusion. You would need a sample set in the millions to see if your "string of bad luck" is statistically sound.
I am currently out of the country but when I return I will do an internal review of a large statistical sample set from BJ across multiple licensees and post those findings here. That will likely not change anyone's mind since gamblers by their very nature tend to be superstitious. Still we will make an effort to show all of you that the game plays as it has for years.
I will be back in the office on July 5th.
eek said:An interesting thread but theres the same old deja vu as regards randomness.
Until the players have a decent utility for recording gameplay like the truegambler-client or the cipher-client then we will have the usual speculation and squabbling.
Thats a useful looking bit of kit btw Cipher, players will pay hard cash for that sort of thing.
cipher said:Hi Pooter; Thanks for your interest. Myself and another individual co-wrote the Cipher program some six years ago now and I've used it ever sense. We are currently re-writing Cipher in .net and I'll let you know when its finished.
Have a good one.
LOL, by whom? Boss? Boss ranks along with Playtech as the worst software out there as far as myself and not a few others are concerned.summertime said:Cryptologic and Boss software come recommended...
I love the CasinoOnNet the best. Has anyone ever won a large sum from them?
cipher said:You're quite right eek and I can tell you that there has been some pretty meaningful dialogue taking place recently whereas there is a pretty good chance that Cipher may very well be incorporated into some of the Casinos software. After all if there's nothing to hide the Cipher program can't hurt anything and in fact it could be a very beneficial tool for the casinos in being able to assure their customer base that they are not ashamed of the product that they are putting out. Have a good one.
bewitch said:Ciper, I am totally idiot about the software and I know people will pay big buck for this software. Maybe you can make a nice profit on it. NOW I have to be a cheap housewife here. Don't forget you promise to send me one.![]()
Just kidding. Please take good care of yourself first. Hope you will visit the golf course soon! Enjoy the beautiful sunny California~![]()
cipher said:Hi Bewitch;
A deal is a deal. You'll have it soon. All the best to you and yours as well.
GrandMaster said:Does this software record the cards automatically like the OCA, or does it process play logs you get from the casino?
lanidar said:I clicked on the attachment. I does NOT open. Am I doing something wrong?